Paul Cottu, Sue Cheeseman, Peter Hall, Achim Wöckel, Christian W Scholz, Emilio Bria, Armando Orlandi, Nuria Ribelles, Mahéva Vallet, Nicolas Niklas, Catherine Hogg, Shivani Aggarwal, Joana Moreira, Markus Lucerna, Simon M Collin, Amanda Logue, Gráinne H Long
{"title":"欧洲 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者不同治疗方案之间的流失和实际治疗效果:一项利用电子病历进行的队列研究。","authors":"Paul Cottu, Sue Cheeseman, Peter Hall, Achim Wöckel, Christian W Scholz, Emilio Bria, Armando Orlandi, Nuria Ribelles, Mahéva Vallet, Nicolas Niklas, Catherine Hogg, Shivani Aggarwal, Joana Moreira, Markus Lucerna, Simon M Collin, Amanda Logue, Gráinne H Long","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07506-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize real-world attrition rates across first-line (1L) to third-line (3L) therapies in patients with HER2-positive (HER2 +) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) receiving routine care in seven hospital systems across Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, multi-country, cohort study collected electronic medical record data from women aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with HER2 + mBC from 2017-2021. The primary endpoint was attrition rate (the proportion of patients receiving a line of therapy [LOT] with no further evidence of subsequent LOTs). Key additional endpoints included treatment patterns, real-world time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to next treatment (TTNT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.0-34.6) and 34.2% (95% CI 27.5-41.5) of treated patients with HER2 + mBC had no further evidence of treatment beyond 1L and second-line (2L) therapy, respectively. Attrition was primarily owing to death, move to end-of-life palliative care, loss to follow up, and \"other\" reasons. Treatment patterns were generally aligned with clinical guidelines. Decreases in TTD (12.1 months [95% CI 10.4-14.5] for 1L, 8.9 months [95% CI 7.3-11.9] for 2L, 6.4 months [95% CI 5.2-8.9] for 3L) and TTNT (15.4 months [95% CI 13.6-20.6] for 1L, 13.5 months [95% CI 10.8-19.4] for 2L) were observed with each subsequent LOT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results unveil a large proportion of patients who do not benefit from state-of-the-art subsequent LOT, and suggest diminishing effectiveness with each subsequent LOT.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attrition between lines of therapy and real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Europe: a cohort study leveraging electronic medical records.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Cottu, Sue Cheeseman, Peter Hall, Achim Wöckel, Christian W Scholz, Emilio Bria, Armando Orlandi, Nuria Ribelles, Mahéva Vallet, Nicolas Niklas, Catherine Hogg, Shivani Aggarwal, Joana Moreira, Markus Lucerna, Simon M Collin, Amanda Logue, Gráinne H Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07506-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize real-world attrition rates across first-line (1L) to third-line (3L) therapies in patients with HER2-positive (HER2 +) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) receiving routine care in seven hospital systems across Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, multi-country, cohort study collected electronic medical record data from women aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with HER2 + mBC from 2017-2021. The primary endpoint was attrition rate (the proportion of patients receiving a line of therapy [LOT] with no further evidence of subsequent LOTs). Key additional endpoints included treatment patterns, real-world time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to next treatment (TTNT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.0-34.6) and 34.2% (95% CI 27.5-41.5) of treated patients with HER2 + mBC had no further evidence of treatment beyond 1L and second-line (2L) therapy, respectively. Attrition was primarily owing to death, move to end-of-life palliative care, loss to follow up, and \\\"other\\\" reasons. Treatment patterns were generally aligned with clinical guidelines. Decreases in TTD (12.1 months [95% CI 10.4-14.5] for 1L, 8.9 months [95% CI 7.3-11.9] for 2L, 6.4 months [95% CI 5.2-8.9] for 3L) and TTNT (15.4 months [95% CI 13.6-20.6] for 1L, 13.5 months [95% CI 10.8-19.4] for 2L) were observed with each subsequent LOT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results unveil a large proportion of patients who do not benefit from state-of-the-art subsequent LOT, and suggest diminishing effectiveness with each subsequent LOT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07506-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07506-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述在欧洲(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国)七家医院系统接受常规治疗的HER2阳性(HER2 +)转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者从一线(1L)到三线(3L)治疗的真实世界减员率:这项回顾性、观察性、多国队列研究收集了2017-2021年间年龄≥18岁、确诊为HER2 + mBC的女性的电子病历数据。主要终点是自然减员率(接受一线治疗[LOT]且无后续LOT证据的患者比例)。结果:接受治疗的 HER2 + mBC 患者中,分别有 29.6%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 25.0-34.6)和 34.2%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 27.5-41.5)的患者在一线和二线(2L)治疗后没有进一步的治疗证据。自然减员的主要原因是死亡、转入临终姑息治疗、失去随访机会以及 "其他 "原因。治疗模式与临床指南基本一致。随着治疗时间的延长,观察到TTD(1L为12.1个月[95% CI 10.4-14.5],2L为8.9个月[95% CI 7.3-11.9],3L为6.4个月[95% CI 5.2-8.9])和TTNT(1L为15.4个月[95% CI 13.6-20.6],2L为13.5个月[95% CI 10.8-19.4])的下降:结果揭示了很大一部分患者无法从最先进的后续 LOT 中获益,并表明每次后续 LOT 的有效性都在降低。
Attrition between lines of therapy and real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Europe: a cohort study leveraging electronic medical records.
Purpose: To characterize real-world attrition rates across first-line (1L) to third-line (3L) therapies in patients with HER2-positive (HER2 +) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) receiving routine care in seven hospital systems across Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK).
Methods: This retrospective, observational, multi-country, cohort study collected electronic medical record data from women aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with HER2 + mBC from 2017-2021. The primary endpoint was attrition rate (the proportion of patients receiving a line of therapy [LOT] with no further evidence of subsequent LOTs). Key additional endpoints included treatment patterns, real-world time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and time to next treatment (TTNT).
Results: 29.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.0-34.6) and 34.2% (95% CI 27.5-41.5) of treated patients with HER2 + mBC had no further evidence of treatment beyond 1L and second-line (2L) therapy, respectively. Attrition was primarily owing to death, move to end-of-life palliative care, loss to follow up, and "other" reasons. Treatment patterns were generally aligned with clinical guidelines. Decreases in TTD (12.1 months [95% CI 10.4-14.5] for 1L, 8.9 months [95% CI 7.3-11.9] for 2L, 6.4 months [95% CI 5.2-8.9] for 3L) and TTNT (15.4 months [95% CI 13.6-20.6] for 1L, 13.5 months [95% CI 10.8-19.4] for 2L) were observed with each subsequent LOT.
Conclusion: Results unveil a large proportion of patients who do not benefit from state-of-the-art subsequent LOT, and suggest diminishing effectiveness with each subsequent LOT.