专用桡动脉休息室对当天出院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31208
Federico Liberman MD, Fernando Botto MD, MSc, Mariano N. Benzadon MD, Pablo M. Lamelas MD, MSc, Pablo M. Spaletra MD, Pablo D. Mascolo MD, Santiago Ordoñez MD, Lucio T. Padilla MD, Gustavo O. Pedernera MD, Jorge Belardi MD, Fernando A. Cura MD, PhD
{"title":"专用桡动脉休息室对当天出院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响。","authors":"Federico Liberman MD,&nbsp;Fernando Botto MD, MSc,&nbsp;Mariano N. Benzadon MD,&nbsp;Pablo M. Lamelas MD, MSc,&nbsp;Pablo M. Spaletra MD,&nbsp;Pablo D. Mascolo MD,&nbsp;Santiago Ordoñez MD,&nbsp;Lucio T. Padilla MD,&nbsp;Gustavo O. Pedernera MD,&nbsp;Jorge Belardi MD,&nbsp;Fernando A. Cura MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The same-day discharge (SDD) program after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe strategy that allows for the optimization of hospital resources. However, the lack of adequate infrastructure and a specially targeted care model may limit its implementation. Our center developed an outpatient care model based on an area designed for percutaneous procedures called radial lounge (RL).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the RL care model: (1) SDD rate, (2) patient experience, (3) major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality and intervention), and (4) vascular access complication. Secondary objective: Impact of RL SDD rate on total elective SDD-PCI volume.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at a cardiovascular hospital, including consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI between 2015 and 2022 who were admitted to the conventional hospitalization area (CHA) or the RL about the stated objectives. Patient experience was assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 5466 elective PCI procedures were included: 2102 in the RL and 3364 in the CHA. The SDD rate was 85.2% in the RL group and 54% in the CHA. After the implementation of RL, a significant increase in the volume of elective SDD-PCI was observed and patient satisfaction improved significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005) with CHA. Finally, a greater amount of MACEs were not observed in the RL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The PCI program in RL proved to be safe and effective. It showed a higher rate of SDD and a significant improvement in patient experience was observed without affecting safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 6","pages":"1189-1195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a dedicated radial lounge on same-day discharge percutaneous coronary intervention\",\"authors\":\"Federico Liberman MD,&nbsp;Fernando Botto MD, MSc,&nbsp;Mariano N. Benzadon MD,&nbsp;Pablo M. Lamelas MD, MSc,&nbsp;Pablo M. Spaletra MD,&nbsp;Pablo D. Mascolo MD,&nbsp;Santiago Ordoñez MD,&nbsp;Lucio T. Padilla MD,&nbsp;Gustavo O. Pedernera MD,&nbsp;Jorge Belardi MD,&nbsp;Fernando A. Cura MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The same-day discharge (SDD) program after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe strategy that allows for the optimization of hospital resources. However, the lack of adequate infrastructure and a specially targeted care model may limit its implementation. Our center developed an outpatient care model based on an area designed for percutaneous procedures called radial lounge (RL).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the RL care model: (1) SDD rate, (2) patient experience, (3) major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality and intervention), and (4) vascular access complication. Secondary objective: Impact of RL SDD rate on total elective SDD-PCI volume.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at a cardiovascular hospital, including consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI between 2015 and 2022 who were admitted to the conventional hospitalization area (CHA) or the RL about the stated objectives. Patient experience was assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 5466 elective PCI procedures were included: 2102 in the RL and 3364 in the CHA. The SDD rate was 85.2% in the RL group and 54% in the CHA. After the implementation of RL, a significant increase in the volume of elective SDD-PCI was observed and patient satisfaction improved significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005) with CHA. Finally, a greater amount of MACEs were not observed in the RL.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PCI program in RL proved to be safe and effective. It showed a higher rate of SDD and a significant improvement in patient experience was observed without affecting safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\"104 6\",\"pages\":\"1189-1195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31208\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的当日出院(SDD)计划是一种安全的策略,可以优化医院资源。然而,缺乏足够的基础设施和有针对性的护理模式可能会限制其实施。目的:评估 RL 护理模式的有效性和安全性:(1) SDD 率;(2) 患者体验;(3) 主要心脏不良事件 (MACE)(院内、30 天和 1 年死亡率及介入治疗);(4) 血管通路并发症: 次要目标:RL SDD 率对择期 SDD-PCI 总量的影响:我们在一家心血管医院开展了一项回顾性观察队列研究,研究对象包括 2015 年至 2022 年期间接受择期 PCI 的连续患者,这些患者均在常规住院区(CHA)或 RL 就既定目标住院。患者体验通过医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查进行评估:结果:共纳入 5466 例择期 PCI 手术:结果:共纳入 5466 例择期 PCI 手术:2102 例纳入 RL,3364 例纳入 CHA。RL组的SDD率为85.2%,CHA组为54%。在实施 RL 后,观察到择期 SDD-PCI 的数量显著增加,患者的满意度也明显提高(p 结论:RL 的 PCI 计划被证明是一种有效的治疗方法:事实证明,RL 的 PCI 项目安全有效。在不影响安全性的前提下,它提高了 SDD 率,并明显改善了患者的就医体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a dedicated radial lounge on same-day discharge percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

The same-day discharge (SDD) program after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a safe strategy that allows for the optimization of hospital resources. However, the lack of adequate infrastructure and a specially targeted care model may limit its implementation. Our center developed an outpatient care model based on an area designed for percutaneous procedures called radial lounge (RL).

Aims

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the RL care model: (1) SDD rate, (2) patient experience, (3) major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality and intervention), and (4) vascular access complication. Secondary objective: Impact of RL SDD rate on total elective SDD-PCI volume.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at a cardiovascular hospital, including consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI between 2015 and 2022 who were admitted to the conventional hospitalization area (CHA) or the RL about the stated objectives. Patient experience was assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey.

Results

A total of 5466 elective PCI procedures were included: 2102 in the RL and 3364 in the CHA. The SDD rate was 85.2% in the RL group and 54% in the CHA. After the implementation of RL, a significant increase in the volume of elective SDD-PCI was observed and patient satisfaction improved significantly (p < 0.005) with CHA. Finally, a greater amount of MACEs were not observed in the RL.

Conclusions

The PCI program in RL proved to be safe and effective. It showed a higher rate of SDD and a significant improvement in patient experience was observed without affecting safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of a Fully Angiography-Derived Versus a Hybrid of Angiography and Pressure-Wire-Derived Approach to Assess Coronary Microvascular Resistance: The Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction Hybrid (OxAMI-HYBRID) Study. Intravascular Lithotripsy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Procedural and One-Year Clinical Outcomes From the BENELUX-IVL Registry. Edoxaban Monotherapy and Incidence of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis - The Rotterdam Edoxaban (REDOX) Study. Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Post Myocardial Infarct Ventricular Septal Rupture After Surgical Patch Dehiscence. Acute Stent Thrombosis Following Reprotrusion of a Calcified Nodule in the Left Main Coronary Artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1