{"title":"评估新生儿出生复苏期间心电图对心率评估的功效：一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Kee Hyun Cho, Hyun Su Lee, Eun Sun Kim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, <i>P</i><0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, <i>P</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Kee Hyun Cho, Hyun Su Lee, Eun Sun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.24.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, <i>P</i><0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, <i>P</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在评估在高危新生儿复苏期间，心电图与脉搏血氧仪在检测心率（HR）方面的功效：方法：对高危分娩病例进行前瞻性观察研究，测量检测心率所需的时间。结果：对 41 名婴儿进行了分析：研究分析了 41 名婴儿，其中 11 名需要复苏。9 名婴儿出生时体重为 36 千克。心电图从放置到检测心率的时间明显快于 PO 检测时间[30（20-43.5）秒 vs. 125（100-175）秒，PP=0.039]：结论：与 PO 相比，ECG 能有效评估新生儿复苏期间的心率。结论：与 PO 相比，心电图能有效评估新生儿复苏过程中的心率，经常需要复苏的低胎龄婴儿可受益于附近标准心电图的心率评估。
Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment.
Results: Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, P<0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, P=0.039).
Conclusion: ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
