肥胖症患者在感知歧视方面的性别差异。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1111/cob.12711
Marianne O Olaniran, Eda G Kapti, M Sunil Mathew, Jeffrey N Schellinger, Marlyn A Allicock, Sarah E Messiah, Jaime P Almandoz
{"title":"肥胖症患者在感知歧视方面的性别差异。","authors":"Marianne O Olaniran, Eda G Kapti, M Sunil Mathew, Jeffrey N Schellinger, Marlyn A Allicock, Sarah E Messiah, Jaime P Almandoz","doi":"10.1111/cob.12711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The negative impacts of perceived discrimination on health have been documented, but how perceptions of discrimination vary by sex among people with obesity (PWO) is not well understood. This study assessed sex differences in perceived discrimination among PWO. This cross-sectional study analysed self-reported data from racially/ethnically diverse PWO attending an academic obesity program. The primary outcome was perceived discrimination, assessed by the Major Experiences of Discrimination (MED) and Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS). Sex differences were evaluated by univariate and multivariable regression analysis adjusted for key descriptive variables. The final analytical sample included 60 PWO (62% female, 61% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 12% Hispanic, 39% non-Hispanic black (NHB), mean age 53 years, mean BMI 34 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Women experienced everyday discrimination 59% less than men but this was not significant (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.08-2.16; p = .29). Participant highest BMI was correlated with acute discrimination (total MED score) (r = 0.39; p = .0024) and chronic discrimination (total EDS score) (r = 0.28; p = .03). Most participants reported more chronic discrimination compared to acute discrimination (85% vs. 48%). Mean MED (β -0.18; 95% CI -0.93 to +0.56; p = .62) and EDS scores (β -0.25; 95% CI -3.37 to +2.87; p = .87) were not significantly different between women and men. Perceived discrimination was common and experienced equally between men and women with obesity. Incorporating discrimination experiences into obesity care models may be an important step to improving quality of care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e12711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in perceived discrimination among patients with obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne O Olaniran, Eda G Kapti, M Sunil Mathew, Jeffrey N Schellinger, Marlyn A Allicock, Sarah E Messiah, Jaime P Almandoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The negative impacts of perceived discrimination on health have been documented, but how perceptions of discrimination vary by sex among people with obesity (PWO) is not well understood. This study assessed sex differences in perceived discrimination among PWO. This cross-sectional study analysed self-reported data from racially/ethnically diverse PWO attending an academic obesity program. The primary outcome was perceived discrimination, assessed by the Major Experiences of Discrimination (MED) and Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS). Sex differences were evaluated by univariate and multivariable regression analysis adjusted for key descriptive variables. The final analytical sample included 60 PWO (62% female, 61% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 12% Hispanic, 39% non-Hispanic black (NHB), mean age 53 years, mean BMI 34 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Women experienced everyday discrimination 59% less than men but this was not significant (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.08-2.16; p = .29). Participant highest BMI was correlated with acute discrimination (total MED score) (r = 0.39; p = .0024) and chronic discrimination (total EDS score) (r = 0.28; p = .03). Most participants reported more chronic discrimination compared to acute discrimination (85% vs. 48%). Mean MED (β -0.18; 95% CI -0.93 to +0.56; p = .62) and EDS scores (β -0.25; 95% CI -3.37 to +2.87; p = .87) were not significantly different between women and men. Perceived discrimination was common and experienced equally between men and women with obesity. Incorporating discrimination experiences into obesity care models may be an important step to improving quality of care and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e12711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有资料表明,感知到的歧视会对健康产生负面影响,但人们对肥胖症患者(PWO)中不同性别的歧视感知有何差异还不甚了解。本研究评估了肥胖症患者在感知歧视方面的性别差异。这项横断面研究分析了参加肥胖症学术项目的不同种族/族裔肥胖症患者的自我报告数据。主要结果是感知到的歧视,通过主要歧视经历量表(MED)和日常歧视量表(EDS)进行评估。性别差异通过单变量和多变量回归分析进行评估,并对主要描述性变量进行调整。最终的分析样本包括 60 名 PWO(62% 为女性,61% 为非西班牙裔白人(NHW),12% 为西班牙裔,39% 为非西班牙裔黑人(NHB),平均年龄 53 岁,平均体重指数 34 kg/m2)。女性遭受的日常歧视比男性少 59%,但并不显著(OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.08-2.16; p = .29)。参与者的最高体重指数与急性歧视(MED 总分)(r = 0.39; p = .0024)和慢性歧视(EDS 总分)(r = 0.28; p = .03)相关。与急性歧视相比,大多数参与者报告了更多的慢性歧视(85% 对 48%)。平均 MED(β -0.18;95% CI -0.93 至 +0.56;p = .62)和 EDS 分数(β -0.25;95% CI -3.37 至 +2.87;p = .87)在女性和男性之间没有显著差异。男性和女性肥胖症患者都普遍存在歧视感,而且遭受歧视的程度相同。将歧视经历纳入肥胖症护理模式可能是提高护理质量和效果的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex differences in perceived discrimination among patients with obesity.

The negative impacts of perceived discrimination on health have been documented, but how perceptions of discrimination vary by sex among people with obesity (PWO) is not well understood. This study assessed sex differences in perceived discrimination among PWO. This cross-sectional study analysed self-reported data from racially/ethnically diverse PWO attending an academic obesity program. The primary outcome was perceived discrimination, assessed by the Major Experiences of Discrimination (MED) and Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS). Sex differences were evaluated by univariate and multivariable regression analysis adjusted for key descriptive variables. The final analytical sample included 60 PWO (62% female, 61% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 12% Hispanic, 39% non-Hispanic black (NHB), mean age 53 years, mean BMI 34 kg/m2). Women experienced everyday discrimination 59% less than men but this was not significant (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.08-2.16; p = .29). Participant highest BMI was correlated with acute discrimination (total MED score) (r = 0.39; p = .0024) and chronic discrimination (total EDS score) (r = 0.28; p = .03). Most participants reported more chronic discrimination compared to acute discrimination (85% vs. 48%). Mean MED (β -0.18; 95% CI -0.93 to +0.56; p = .62) and EDS scores (β -0.25; 95% CI -3.37 to +2.87; p = .87) were not significantly different between women and men. Perceived discrimination was common and experienced equally between men and women with obesity. Incorporating discrimination experiences into obesity care models may be an important step to improving quality of care and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
期刊最新文献
Effect of the National Enhanced Service for weight management on the content of annual review consultations for patients living with obesity and hypertension and/or diabetes. Issue Information A cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of family-centred obesity management program in primary care settings: A study protocol. Effect of interdisciplinary obesity care on metabolic markers and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting: A randomised controlled trial. Improving obesity management: Insights from the ACTION Switzerland survey of people with obesity, physicians and dietitians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1