大肠癌肺转移的治疗:两个中心的回顾性研究

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1159/000539927
Myrtle F Krul, Jan M van Rees, Amihan M de Boer, Karlijn K Neve, Cornelis Verhoef, Koert F D Kuhlmann, Tarik R Baetens, Tineke E Buffart, Joost L Knegjens, Houke M Klomp, Theo J M Ruers, Marianne de Vries, Joost Rothbarth, Esther van Meerten, Joost J M E Nuyttens, Dirk Grünhagen, Niels F M Kok
{"title":"大肠癌肺转移的治疗:两个中心的回顾性研究","authors":"Myrtle F Krul, Jan M van Rees, Amihan M de Boer, Karlijn K Neve, Cornelis Verhoef, Koert F D Kuhlmann, Tarik R Baetens, Tineke E Buffart, Joost L Knegjens, Houke M Klomp, Theo J M Ruers, Marianne de Vries, Joost Rothbarth, Esther van Meerten, Joost J M E Nuyttens, Dirk Grünhagen, Niels F M Kok","doi":"10.1159/000539927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"538-547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Myrtle F Krul, Jan M van Rees, Amihan M de Boer, Karlijn K Neve, Cornelis Verhoef, Koert F D Kuhlmann, Tarik R Baetens, Tineke E Buffart, Joost L Knegjens, Houke M Klomp, Theo J M Ruers, Marianne de Vries, Joost Rothbarth, Esther van Meerten, Joost J M E Nuyttens, Dirk Grünhagen, Niels F M Kok\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"538-547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:目前尚无明确的结直肠肺转移(LM)治疗指南。本研究旨在深入了解符合(潜在)治愈性治疗条件的肺转移瘤患者的治疗策略以及局部和全身治疗的疗效:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是两个三级转诊中心讨论过的≤5例LM患者。比较不同治疗组的患者和肿瘤特征。比较不同中心的治疗策略,以及不同治疗组、局部治疗方式和治疗中心的生存数据:共纳入 92 名患者(中位数为 2 个 LM)。71例(77%)患者接受了局部治疗(17例手术、13例消融、38例放疗、3例局部联合治疗),21例(23%)患者仅接受了全身治疗。后一组患者更常出现肺外转移(81.0% 对 26.8%,P < 0.001)和 LM 同步表现(23.8% 对 7.0%,P = 0.045)。选择局部治疗还是全身治疗以及确诊后开始治疗的时间(中位数109天,IQR 44-240 vs. 88天,IQR 53-168)在不同中心之间具有可比性。不同治疗组、局部治疗方式或治疗中心的三年生存率没有差异:结论:不同治疗中心的治疗策略和肿瘤结果相当相似。结论:各中心的治疗策略和肿瘤治疗效果非常相似,局部治疗和全身治疗患者的生存率也没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers.

Results: Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers.

Conclusion: Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
期刊最新文献
Markers of Prognosis for Acute Esophageal Necrosis: A Systematic Review. Prevalence and endoscopic features of colorectal non-polypoid lesions: a single-center retrospective study from a large cohort of FIT-positive screening patients in Northern Italy. Comparison of genetic mutations of gastric cancer diagnosed before or after H. pylori eradication and between differentiated and undifferentiated types using next-generation sequencing. Symptom Reporting in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Higher Burden of Symptoms detection using an interactive App. Association between the Achievement of Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery (TOLS) and Overall Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Following Major Hepatectomy: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1