上消化道出血中的预防性质子泵抑制剂:法国多中心队列中质子泵抑制剂的影响和用药不足。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08663-8
Weam El Hajj, Stéphane Nahon, Eddy Fares, Vincent Quentin, Denis Grasset, Jean-Pierre Arpurt, Florence Skinazi, René-Louis Vitte, Laurent Costes, André-Jean Remy, Christophe Locher, Gilles Macaigne
{"title":"上消化道出血中的预防性质子泵抑制剂:法国多中心队列中质子泵抑制剂的影响和用药不足。","authors":"Weam El Hajj, Stéphane Nahon, Eddy Fares, Vincent Quentin, Denis Grasset, Jean-Pierre Arpurt, Florence Skinazi, René-Louis Vitte, Laurent Costes, André-Jean Remy, Christophe Locher, Gilles Macaigne","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08663-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appropriate prescription of Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains an important concern amid the rising overuse. A gap exists in the literature regarding the benefit of PPI prophylaxis and the consequences of underprescription in patients at risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to describe the characteristics of hemorrhage in relation to PPI use in patients experiencing UGIB, with a focus on high-risk individuals requiring gastroprotection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a French multicentric cohort of patients experiencing UGIB were analyzed. Patients using PPI were compared to those without PPI considering bleeding etiologies and outcomes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD)-related hemorrhage. The rate of PPI use and its effect on bleeding characteristics in high-risk populations, defined based on international guidelines, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2497 included patients, 31.1% were on PPI at bleeding onset. PPI users exhibited a significantly lower rate of PUD-related bleeding in comparison with those without PPI (24.7 vs 40.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similar difference was observed in high-risk populations, of whom, only 40.3% had gastroprotection with PPI before bleeding onset. PPI prophylaxis, however, did not influence the severity of bleeding in the general study population or in high-risk groups. Multivariate analysis identified age, comorbidities, and having more than two anti-thrombotic agents as predictors of severe bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPI users appear to have a lower rate of bleeding ulcers compared to non-users. However, underprescription in high-risk groups raises the need for standardized care to ensure appropriate PPI use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic Proton Pump Inhibitors in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Impact and Underprescription in a French Multicentric Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Weam El Hajj, Stéphane Nahon, Eddy Fares, Vincent Quentin, Denis Grasset, Jean-Pierre Arpurt, Florence Skinazi, René-Louis Vitte, Laurent Costes, André-Jean Remy, Christophe Locher, Gilles Macaigne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08663-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appropriate prescription of Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains an important concern amid the rising overuse. A gap exists in the literature regarding the benefit of PPI prophylaxis and the consequences of underprescription in patients at risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to describe the characteristics of hemorrhage in relation to PPI use in patients experiencing UGIB, with a focus on high-risk individuals requiring gastroprotection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a French multicentric cohort of patients experiencing UGIB were analyzed. Patients using PPI were compared to those without PPI considering bleeding etiologies and outcomes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD)-related hemorrhage. The rate of PPI use and its effect on bleeding characteristics in high-risk populations, defined based on international guidelines, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2497 included patients, 31.1% were on PPI at bleeding onset. PPI users exhibited a significantly lower rate of PUD-related bleeding in comparison with those without PPI (24.7 vs 40.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similar difference was observed in high-risk populations, of whom, only 40.3% had gastroprotection with PPI before bleeding onset. PPI prophylaxis, however, did not influence the severity of bleeding in the general study population or in high-risk groups. Multivariate analysis identified age, comorbidities, and having more than two anti-thrombotic agents as predictors of severe bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPI users appear to have a lower rate of bleeding ulcers compared to non-users. However, underprescription in high-risk groups raises the need for standardized care to ensure appropriate PPI use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08663-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08663-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的合理处方仍是过度使用日益增多的一个重要问题。有关上消化道出血(UGIB)高危患者预防性服用 PPI 的益处以及用药不足的后果的文献存在空白。目的:本研究旨在描述 UGIB 患者出血的特征与 PPI 使用的关系,重点关注需要胃保护的高危人群:分析了法国多中心队列中 UGIB 患者的数据。考虑到出血病因和消化性溃疡病(PUD)相关出血的结果,将使用 PPI 的患者与未使用 PPI 的患者进行了比较。此外,还评估了根据国际指南定义的高危人群使用 PPI 的比例及其对出血特征的影响:结果:在纳入的 2497 名患者中,31.1% 的患者在出血开始时使用 PPI。与未使用 PPI 的患者相比,使用 PPI 的患者发生 PUD 相关出血的比例明显较低(分别为 24.7% 与 40.8%,P 结论:使用 PPI 的患者发生 PUD 相关出血的比例较低:与不使用 PPI 的患者相比,使用 PPI 的患者溃疡出血率较低。然而,高危人群用药不足的问题提出了标准化护理的必要性,以确保 PPI 的合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prophylactic Proton Pump Inhibitors in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Impact and Underprescription in a French Multicentric Cohort.

Background: Appropriate prescription of Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains an important concern amid the rising overuse. A gap exists in the literature regarding the benefit of PPI prophylaxis and the consequences of underprescription in patients at risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

Aims: This study aims to describe the characteristics of hemorrhage in relation to PPI use in patients experiencing UGIB, with a focus on high-risk individuals requiring gastroprotection.

Methods: Data from a French multicentric cohort of patients experiencing UGIB were analyzed. Patients using PPI were compared to those without PPI considering bleeding etiologies and outcomes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD)-related hemorrhage. The rate of PPI use and its effect on bleeding characteristics in high-risk populations, defined based on international guidelines, were also assessed.

Results: Among 2497 included patients, 31.1% were on PPI at bleeding onset. PPI users exhibited a significantly lower rate of PUD-related bleeding in comparison with those without PPI (24.7 vs 40.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similar difference was observed in high-risk populations, of whom, only 40.3% had gastroprotection with PPI before bleeding onset. PPI prophylaxis, however, did not influence the severity of bleeding in the general study population or in high-risk groups. Multivariate analysis identified age, comorbidities, and having more than two anti-thrombotic agents as predictors of severe bleeding.

Conclusions: PPI users appear to have a lower rate of bleeding ulcers compared to non-users. However, underprescription in high-risk groups raises the need for standardized care to ensure appropriate PPI use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Country Comfort? Risk Factors for Unplanned Healthcare Visits in Rural America in Children with IBD. Preventive Measures and Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. A Case of Imaging-Negative Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnosed by Novel Spyglass Transoral Cholangioscope. Association of Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa in the Upper Esophagus (HGMUE) with Pharyngolaryngeal Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Knowledge and Education Among Healthcare Professional Groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1