{"title":"2020-2022 年在高海拔地区接受化疗放疗的宫颈癌患者的血红蛋白水平和生存率。","authors":"José Fernando Robles Díaz","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the prognosis of altitude and pre-treatment hemoglobin (Hb) levels with progression-free survival (PFS) among women from the jungle and Andean regions of Peru with cervical cancer (CC) receiving weekly cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy or teletherapy boost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced clinical stage II-IVA CC were grouped according to Hb level (≥ 12.0, 11.9-10.0, 9.9-9.0 and ≤ 8.9 g/dL). Outcome measures were PFS, overall survival and local PFS.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 1/2020 and 12/2022, 159 patients contributed demographic, clinical, pre-treatment Hb and outcome data with a median follow-up of 38 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates for survivals according to pre-treatment Hb level were significant when compared to a level of ≤8.9 g/dL, while estimates with altitude did not show statistical significance. Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated that pre-treatment Hb levels ≤8.9 g/dL (<i>p</i> = 0.000) were a significant factor. Age (<i>p</i> = 0.023), stage (<i>p</i> = 0.000), tumour size (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and treatment duration (<i>p</i> = 0.000) were also significant in the regression model.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>There is no difference between altitude and survival, but the difference in pre-treatment Hb level was a prognostic indicator of survival, with a Hb level of ≤8.9 g/dL being the worst prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemoglobin level and survival in cervical cancer with chemoradiotherapy at high altitude, 2020-2022.\",\"authors\":\"José Fernando Robles Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the prognosis of altitude and pre-treatment hemoglobin (Hb) levels with progression-free survival (PFS) among women from the jungle and Andean regions of Peru with cervical cancer (CC) receiving weekly cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy or teletherapy boost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced clinical stage II-IVA CC were grouped according to Hb level (≥ 12.0, 11.9-10.0, 9.9-9.0 and ≤ 8.9 g/dL). Outcome measures were PFS, overall survival and local PFS.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 1/2020 and 12/2022, 159 patients contributed demographic, clinical, pre-treatment Hb and outcome data with a median follow-up of 38 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates for survivals according to pre-treatment Hb level were significant when compared to a level of ≤8.9 g/dL, while estimates with altitude did not show statistical significance. Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated that pre-treatment Hb levels ≤8.9 g/dL (<i>p</i> = 0.000) were a significant factor. Age (<i>p</i> = 0.023), stage (<i>p</i> = 0.000), tumour size (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and treatment duration (<i>p</i> = 0.000) were also significant in the regression model.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>There is no difference between altitude and survival, but the difference in pre-treatment Hb level was a prognostic indicator of survival, with a Hb level of ≤8.9 g/dL being the worst prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hemoglobin level and survival in cervical cancer with chemoradiotherapy at high altitude, 2020-2022.
Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the prognosis of altitude and pre-treatment hemoglobin (Hb) levels with progression-free survival (PFS) among women from the jungle and Andean regions of Peru with cervical cancer (CC) receiving weekly cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy or teletherapy boost.
Methods: Patients with advanced clinical stage II-IVA CC were grouped according to Hb level (≥ 12.0, 11.9-10.0, 9.9-9.0 and ≤ 8.9 g/dL). Outcome measures were PFS, overall survival and local PFS.
Findings: Between 1/2020 and 12/2022, 159 patients contributed demographic, clinical, pre-treatment Hb and outcome data with a median follow-up of 38 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates for survivals according to pre-treatment Hb level were significant when compared to a level of ≤8.9 g/dL, while estimates with altitude did not show statistical significance. Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated that pre-treatment Hb levels ≤8.9 g/dL (p = 0.000) were a significant factor. Age (p = 0.023), stage (p = 0.000), tumour size (p = 0.006) and treatment duration (p = 0.000) were also significant in the regression model.
Interpretation: There is no difference between altitude and survival, but the difference in pre-treatment Hb level was a prognostic indicator of survival, with a Hb level of ≤8.9 g/dL being the worst prognosis.