心率变异性生物反馈治疗重症多发性神经病:随机假对照研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/ene.16512
Annahita Sedghi, Christoph Bartels, Erik Simon, Florian Krause, Martin Arndt, Stefan Zsigri, Kristian Barlinn, Ulf Bodechtel, Ana Isabel Penzlin, Timo Siepmann
{"title":"心率变异性生物反馈治疗重症多发性神经病:随机假对照研究。","authors":"Annahita Sedghi,&nbsp;Christoph Bartels,&nbsp;Erik Simon,&nbsp;Florian Krause,&nbsp;Martin Arndt,&nbsp;Stefan Zsigri,&nbsp;Kristian Barlinn,&nbsp;Ulf Bodechtel,&nbsp;Ana Isabel Penzlin,&nbsp;Timo Siepmann","doi":"10.1111/ene.16512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (<i>ß</i> = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [<i>p</i> = 0.047] and <i>ß</i> = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [<i>p</i> = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4-week follow-up (<i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011] and <i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (<i>ß</i> = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [<i>p</i> = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> = nonsignificant).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"31 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart rate variability biofeedback for critical illness polyneuropathy: a randomized sham-controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Annahita Sedghi,&nbsp;Christoph Bartels,&nbsp;Erik Simon,&nbsp;Florian Krause,&nbsp;Martin Arndt,&nbsp;Stefan Zsigri,&nbsp;Kristian Barlinn,&nbsp;Ulf Bodechtel,&nbsp;Ana Isabel Penzlin,&nbsp;Timo Siepmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ene.16512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (<i>ß</i> = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [<i>p</i> = 0.047] and <i>ß</i> = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [<i>p</i> = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4-week follow-up (<i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011] and <i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (<i>ß</i> = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [<i>p</i> = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> = nonsignificant).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16512\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:重症多发性神经病(CIP)与自主神经系统失调导致的神经心脏功能障碍有关,后者会增加死亡率。我们旨在评估心率变异性(HRV)生物反馈是否能改善 CIP 的心脏神经功能:我们随机分配(1:1)接受早期住院神经康复治疗的电生理学确诊 CIP 患者接受额外的心率变异生物反馈或假生物反馈治疗,为期 14 天。我们通过正常与正常间期标准差(SDNN)评估神经心功能,作为主要结果,并在基线、干预后和4周后评估心率变异频域、交感神经皮肤运动和血管运动功能以及残疾情况。该研究已在德国临床试验注册中心注册(DRKS00028911):我们共纳入了 30 名 CIP 患者(女性占 40%,中位数[四分位数间距]年龄为 64.6 [56, 72] 岁)。我们观察到干预后 SDNN 和主要副交感神经高频域的增加(ß = 16.4,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.2,32.6 [p=0.047];ß = 1179.2,95% 置信区间 [CI] 119.6 [p=0.047])。2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [p = 0.018]),并在四周的随访中保持不变(ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011] 和 ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011])。与假干预组相比,接受心率变异生物反馈的患者调整后的巴特尔指数较高,表明干预后 4 周的残疾程度较轻(ß = 23.3,95% CI 5.5,41.1 [p=0.014])。低频和交感神经皮肤功能在各组之间没有差异(p = 无显著性):我们的研究提供的试验数据表明,心率变异生物反馈疗法可改善 CIP 患者的心脏神经功能,对副交感神经系统有显著影响,并对功能恢复有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heart rate variability biofeedback for critical illness polyneuropathy: a randomized sham-controlled study

Background and purpose

Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.

Methods

We randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).

Results

We included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (ß = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [p = 0.047] and ß = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [p = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4-week follow-up (ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011] and ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (ß = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [p = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (p = nonsignificant).

Conclusions

Our study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
期刊最新文献
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDP) with monotruncular onset: Frequency, clinical features, electrophysiology, and evolution. Atrial fibrillation in young stroke patients: Associated factors and outcomes in a nationwide analysis. Enhancing multisensory rehabilitation of visual field defects with transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized clinical trial. Real-life experience with disease-modifying drugs in hereditary transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy: A clinical and electrophysiological appraisal. Switching from ligand to receptor anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibodies or vice versa in non-responders: A controlled cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1