Annahita Sedghi, Christoph Bartels, Erik Simon, Florian Krause, Martin Arndt, Stefan Zsigri, Kristian Barlinn, Ulf Bodechtel, Ana Isabel Penzlin, Timo Siepmann
{"title":"心率变异性生物反馈治疗重症多发性神经病:随机假对照研究。","authors":"Annahita Sedghi, Christoph Bartels, Erik Simon, Florian Krause, Martin Arndt, Stefan Zsigri, Kristian Barlinn, Ulf Bodechtel, Ana Isabel Penzlin, Timo Siepmann","doi":"10.1111/ene.16512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (<i>ß</i> = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [<i>p</i> = 0.047] and <i>ß</i> = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [<i>p</i> = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4-week follow-up (<i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011] and <i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (<i>ß</i> = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [<i>p</i> = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> = nonsignificant).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"31 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart rate variability biofeedback for critical illness polyneuropathy: a randomized sham-controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Annahita Sedghi, Christoph Bartels, Erik Simon, Florian Krause, Martin Arndt, Stefan Zsigri, Kristian Barlinn, Ulf Bodechtel, Ana Isabel Penzlin, Timo Siepmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ene.16512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (<i>ß</i> = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [<i>p</i> = 0.047] and <i>ß</i> = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [<i>p</i> = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4-week follow-up (<i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011] and <i>ß</i> = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [<i>p</i> = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (<i>ß</i> = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [<i>p</i> = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (<i>p</i> = nonsignificant).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16512\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Heart rate variability biofeedback for critical illness polyneuropathy: a randomized sham-controlled study
Background and purpose
Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) has been linked to neurocardiac dysfunction mediated by autonomic nervous system dysregulation, which increases mortality. We aimed to assess if heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback could improve neurocardiac function in CIP.
Methods
We randomly allocated (1:1) patients with electrophysiologically confirmed CIP undergoing early inpatient neurological rehabilitation to additional HRV or sham biofeedback over 14 days. We evaluated neurocardiac function via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) as the primary outcome, as well as HRV frequency domains, sympathetic cutaneous sudomotor and vasomotor functions and disability at baseline, post intervention and 4 weeks later. The study is registered on the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028911).
Results
We included 30 patients with CIP (40% females, median [interquartile range] age 64.6 [56, 72] years). We observed an increase in SDNN and the predominantly parasympathetic high frequency domain post intervention (ß = 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2, 32.6 [p = 0.047] and ß = 1179.2, 95% CI 119.9, 2158.5 [p = 0.018]), which was sustained at the 4-week follow-up (ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011] and ß = 25.7, 95% CI 6.0, 45.4 [p = 0.011]). Patients who underwent HRV biofeedback displayed a higher adjusted Barthel index, indicating less severe disability 4 weeks after the intervention compared to those in the sham group (ß = 23.3, 95% CI 5.5, 41.1 [p = 0.014]). Low frequency and sympathetic skin functions did not differ between groups (p = nonsignificant).
Conclusions
Our study provides pilot data suggesting that, in patients with CIP, HRV biofeedback can improve neurocardiac function with a predominant effect on the parasympathetic nervous system and has a beneficial effect on functional recovery.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).