比较不同强度的阳极和阴极经颅直流电刺激初级运动皮层对健康年轻人运动学习的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES European Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1111/ejn.16572
Sheida Mousavi, Amin Mottahedi, Fatemeh Ehsani, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhosh, Shapour Jaberzadeh
{"title":"比较不同强度的阳极和阴极经颅直流电刺激初级运动皮层对健康年轻人运动学习的影响。","authors":"Sheida Mousavi,&nbsp;Amin Mottahedi,&nbsp;Fatemeh Ehsani,&nbsp;Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhosh,&nbsp;Shapour Jaberzadeh","doi":"10.1111/ejn.16572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1 mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1 mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2 mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2 mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired <i>t</i>-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1 mA) (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) = 5.19(4); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; and ER (F(DF) = 9(4), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1 mA M1 a-tDCS, 2 mA M1 c-tDCS and 2 mA M1 a-tDCS groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). On the other hand, the 1 mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2 mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"60 10","pages":"6543-6555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults\",\"authors\":\"Sheida Mousavi,&nbsp;Amin Mottahedi,&nbsp;Fatemeh Ehsani,&nbsp;Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhosh,&nbsp;Shapour Jaberzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.16572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1 mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1 mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2 mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2 mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired <i>t</i>-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1 mA) (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) = 5.19(4); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; and ER (F(DF) = 9(4), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1 mA M1 a-tDCS, 2 mA M1 c-tDCS and 2 mA M1 a-tDCS groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). On the other hand, the 1 mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2 mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"6543-6555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.16572\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.16572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同蒙太奇的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对运动学习的影响结果并不一致。本研究旨在比较不同强度的阳极和阴极经颅直流电刺激(c-tDCS)对健康年轻人初级运动皮层(M1)运动学习的影响。参与者被随机分为:(1) 1 mA M1 c-tDCS组;(2) 1 mA M1 阳极 tDCS(a-tDCS)组;(3) 2 mA M1 c-tDCS组;(4) 2 mA M1 a-tDCS组;(5) M1假tDCS组。各组均接受 20 分钟的序列反应时间任务(SRTT)刺激,假 tDCS 组在 30 秒后关闭 tDCS。在干预前、干预期间和干预后 72 小时,对 SRTT 期间的反应时间(RT)和错误率(ER)进行评估。配对 t 检验的结果表明,所有组都进行了在线学习(p 0.05)。单因子方差分析也表明,离线学习存在差异(RT(F(DF)= 5.19(4);p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults

Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1 mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1 mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2 mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2 mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired t-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (p < 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1 mA) (p > 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) = 5.19(4); p < 0.001; and ER (F(DF) = 9(4), p < 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1 mA M1 a-tDCS, 2 mA M1 c-tDCS and 2 mA M1 a-tDCS groups (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the 1 mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2 mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
期刊最新文献
Correction to 'Changes in neuroinflammatory markers and microglial density in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of the C58/J mouse model of autism'. Editorial for special issue: "New trends in the empirical study of consciousness: Measures and mechanisms". GABAergic signalling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus is required for coherent circadian rhythmicity. Regulator of G protein signalling 14 (RGS14) protein expression profile in the adult mouse brain. Behavioural phenotypes of Dicer knockout in the mouse SCN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1