雾化芬太尼不能改善纤维化间质性肺病患者的运动能力或呼吸困难。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Experimental Physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1113/EP092123
Charlotte Chen, John Kolbe, Julian F R Paton, James P Fisher
{"title":"雾化芬太尼不能改善纤维化间质性肺病患者的运动能力或呼吸困难。","authors":"Charlotte Chen, John Kolbe, Julian F R Paton, James P Fisher","doi":"10.1113/EP092123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnoea are hallmarks of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) and are associated with worse prognosis and quality of life. Activation of pulmonary vagal afferents influences the ventilatory pattern and contributes to the sensation of dyspnoea. We tested the hypothesis that nebulized fentanyl, which might attenuate aberrant pulmonary afferent activity in FILD, reduces ventilation and dyspnoea while extending exercise endurance time (EET). In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study, eight FILD patients (two males, 71 ± 6 years of age) performed incremental cardiopulmonary cycle exercise tests following nebulization of either fentanyl citrate (100 µg) or 0.9% saline. Previous work indicated that this dose was unlikely to produce central effects. Comparisons between treatment conditions at rest were undertaken using Student's paired t-test, and exercise data were evaluated with two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Borg dyspnoea scale. Resting respiratory variables were not different following treatment with fentanyl and saline; however, resting heart rate was lower following fentanyl (P = 0.002) and remained lower throughout exercise compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Fentanyl did not increase EET (placebo 334 ± 117 s vs. fentanyl 348 ± 126 s, P = 0.250) although overall minute ventilation was reduced slightly (mean difference: -0.97 L/min, P = 0.022). There were no differences in ratings of dyspnoea intensity or unpleasantness between the conditions either at rest or at end-exercise. Nebulized fentanyl did not improve EET or exercise dyspnoea but did decrease minute ventilation during exercise, although the extent of this reduction appears clinically insignificant. These findings suggest that nebulized fentanyl is unlikely to offer significant benefits for enhancing exercise capacity in FILD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nebulized fentanyl does not improve exercise capacity or dyspnoea in fibrosing interstitial lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Chen, John Kolbe, Julian F R Paton, James P Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP092123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnoea are hallmarks of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) and are associated with worse prognosis and quality of life. Activation of pulmonary vagal afferents influences the ventilatory pattern and contributes to the sensation of dyspnoea. We tested the hypothesis that nebulized fentanyl, which might attenuate aberrant pulmonary afferent activity in FILD, reduces ventilation and dyspnoea while extending exercise endurance time (EET). In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study, eight FILD patients (two males, 71 ± 6 years of age) performed incremental cardiopulmonary cycle exercise tests following nebulization of either fentanyl citrate (100 µg) or 0.9% saline. Previous work indicated that this dose was unlikely to produce central effects. Comparisons between treatment conditions at rest were undertaken using Student's paired t-test, and exercise data were evaluated with two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Borg dyspnoea scale. Resting respiratory variables were not different following treatment with fentanyl and saline; however, resting heart rate was lower following fentanyl (P = 0.002) and remained lower throughout exercise compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Fentanyl did not increase EET (placebo 334 ± 117 s vs. fentanyl 348 ± 126 s, P = 0.250) although overall minute ventilation was reduced slightly (mean difference: -0.97 L/min, P = 0.022). There were no differences in ratings of dyspnoea intensity or unpleasantness between the conditions either at rest or at end-exercise. Nebulized fentanyl did not improve EET or exercise dyspnoea but did decrease minute ventilation during exercise, although the extent of this reduction appears clinically insignificant. These findings suggest that nebulized fentanyl is unlikely to offer significant benefits for enhancing exercise capacity in FILD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动不耐受和劳累性呼吸困难是纤维化间质性肺病(FILD)的特征,与预后和生活质量下降有关。肺迷走神经传入的激活会影响通气模式,并导致呼吸困难的感觉。我们假设雾化芬太尼可减轻 FILD 患者异常的肺传入活动,从而减少通气和呼吸困难,同时延长运动耐力时间 (EET)。在这项随机、单盲、安慰剂对照研究中,8 名 FILD 患者(2 名男性,71 ± 6 岁)在雾化枸橼酸芬太尼(100 µg)或 0.9% 生理盐水后进行了增量心肺循环运动测试。之前的研究表明,这一剂量不太可能产生中枢效应。采用学生配对 t 检验法对不同治疗条件下的静息状态进行比较,采用重复测量的双向方差分析法对运动数据进行评估。呼吸困难采用博格呼吸困难量表进行评估。使用芬太尼和生理盐水治疗后,静息呼吸变量没有差异;但使用芬太尼后,静息心率降低(P = 0.002),与安慰剂相比,静息心率在整个运动过程中都保持较低(P = 0.008)。芬太尼不会增加 EET(安慰剂为 334 ± 117 秒,芬太尼为 348 ± 126 秒,P = 0.250),但总体分钟通气量略有减少(平均差异:-0.97 升/分钟,P = 0.022)。无论是在静息状态下还是在运动结束时,呼吸困难强度或难受程度的评分在不同条件下均无差异。雾化芬太尼没有改善 EET 或运动呼吸困难,但确实降低了运动时的分钟通气量,尽管这种降低的程度在临床上似乎并不明显。这些研究结果表明,雾化芬太尼不太可能为提高 FILD 患者的运动能力带来显著益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nebulized fentanyl does not improve exercise capacity or dyspnoea in fibrosing interstitial lung disease.

Exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnoea are hallmarks of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) and are associated with worse prognosis and quality of life. Activation of pulmonary vagal afferents influences the ventilatory pattern and contributes to the sensation of dyspnoea. We tested the hypothesis that nebulized fentanyl, which might attenuate aberrant pulmonary afferent activity in FILD, reduces ventilation and dyspnoea while extending exercise endurance time (EET). In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study, eight FILD patients (two males, 71 ± 6 years of age) performed incremental cardiopulmonary cycle exercise tests following nebulization of either fentanyl citrate (100 µg) or 0.9% saline. Previous work indicated that this dose was unlikely to produce central effects. Comparisons between treatment conditions at rest were undertaken using Student's paired t-test, and exercise data were evaluated with two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Dyspnoea was assessed using the Borg dyspnoea scale. Resting respiratory variables were not different following treatment with fentanyl and saline; however, resting heart rate was lower following fentanyl (P = 0.002) and remained lower throughout exercise compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Fentanyl did not increase EET (placebo 334 ± 117 s vs. fentanyl 348 ± 126 s, P = 0.250) although overall minute ventilation was reduced slightly (mean difference: -0.97 L/min, P = 0.022). There were no differences in ratings of dyspnoea intensity or unpleasantness between the conditions either at rest or at end-exercise. Nebulized fentanyl did not improve EET or exercise dyspnoea but did decrease minute ventilation during exercise, although the extent of this reduction appears clinically insignificant. These findings suggest that nebulized fentanyl is unlikely to offer significant benefits for enhancing exercise capacity in FILD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
My journey from an early researcher to an aspiring medic: A dance from bench to bedside. Brown and beige adipose tissue-derived metabokine and lipokine inter-organ signalling in health and disease. Imaging the large-scale and cellular response to focal traumatic brain injury in mouse neocortex. Inhibition of TrkB kinase activity impairs autophagy in cervical motor neurons of young but not old mice. Measuring position sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1