比较胫骨横向转移和骨膜牵引技术在治疗糖尿病足难治性溃疡中的疗效。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1396897
Yang Yang, Fang Chen, Yiguo Chen, Wei Wang
{"title":"比较胫骨横向转移和骨膜牵引技术在治疗糖尿病足难治性溃疡中的疗效。","authors":"Yang Yang, Fang Chen, Yiguo Chen, Wei Wang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1396897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of comparing tibia transverse transport (TTT) and periosteal distraction in treating diabetic foot ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 19 patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with both procedures between February 2020 and November 2022, 8 of whom were treated with the tibial transverse transfer technique (transfer group) and 11 with the osteochondral distraction technique (distraction group), was performed to compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All wounds were healed in both groups, and the healing time ranged from 15 to 41days with a mean of 28d. The limb preservation rate was 100%. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and pain score in the operative area were significantly less in the distraction group than in the removal group, with statistically significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Intra-group comparison between the two groups of patients after surgery revealed that the skin temperature, ABI, TcPO2, SWM and VAS of the affected limb were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The expression levels of VEGF, bFGF, EGF and PDGF were significantly higher than before surgery in both groups, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in skin temperature, ABI, TcPO2, SWM, VAS, VEGF, bFGF, EGF and PDGF between the two groups at the corresponding time points preoperatively and postoperatively (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Periosteal distraction technique can significantly promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. It has the same efficacy as TTT in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcer wounds and improving the peripheral circulation of affected limbs. In addition, the periosteal distraction technique has the advantages of small trauma, simple operation, few complications, and convenient nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1396897"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the efficacy of tibial transverse transfer and periosteal distraction techniques in the treatment of diabetic foot refractory ulcers.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Yang, Fang Chen, Yiguo Chen, Wei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1396897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of comparing tibia transverse transport (TTT) and periosteal distraction in treating diabetic foot ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 19 patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with both procedures between February 2020 and November 2022, 8 of whom were treated with the tibial transverse transfer technique (transfer group) and 11 with the osteochondral distraction technique (distraction group), was performed to compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All wounds were healed in both groups, and the healing time ranged from 15 to 41days with a mean of 28d. The limb preservation rate was 100%. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and pain score in the operative area were significantly less in the distraction group than in the removal group, with statistically significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Intra-group comparison between the two groups of patients after surgery revealed that the skin temperature, ABI, TcPO2, SWM and VAS of the affected limb were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The expression levels of VEGF, bFGF, EGF and PDGF were significantly higher than before surgery in both groups, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in skin temperature, ABI, TcPO2, SWM, VAS, VEGF, bFGF, EGF and PDGF between the two groups at the corresponding time points preoperatively and postoperatively (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Periosteal distraction technique can significantly promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. It has the same efficacy as TTT in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcer wounds and improving the peripheral circulation of affected limbs. In addition, the periosteal distraction technique has the advantages of small trauma, simple operation, few complications, and convenient nursing care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1396897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1396897\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1396897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较胫骨横向转移术(TTT)和骨膜牵引术治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:回顾性分析2020年2月至2022年11月期间接受两种手术治疗的19例糖尿病足溃疡患者,其中8例采用胫骨横向转运技术(转运组),11例采用骨软骨牵引技术(牵引组),比较分析两种方法的临床疗效:结果:两组所有伤口均愈合,愈合时间从15天到41天不等,平均为28天。保肢率为 100%。牵引组的手术时间、术中出血量和术区疼痛评分明显少于切除组,差异有统计学意义(P P P P > 0.05):结论:骨膜牵引技术能明显促进糖尿病足溃疡的愈合。结论:骨膜牵引技术可明显促进糖尿病足溃疡的愈合,在促进糖尿病足溃疡伤口愈合和改善患肢末梢循环方面与 TTT 具有相同的疗效。此外,骨膜牵引技术还具有创伤小、操作简单、并发症少、护理方便等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the efficacy of tibial transverse transfer and periosteal distraction techniques in the treatment of diabetic foot refractory ulcers.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of comparing tibia transverse transport (TTT) and periosteal distraction in treating diabetic foot ulcers.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 19 patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with both procedures between February 2020 and November 2022, 8 of whom were treated with the tibial transverse transfer technique (transfer group) and 11 with the osteochondral distraction technique (distraction group), was performed to compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of the two methods.

Results: All wounds were healed in both groups, and the healing time ranged from 15 to 41days with a mean of 28d. The limb preservation rate was 100%. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and pain score in the operative area were significantly less in the distraction group than in the removal group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Intra-group comparison between the two groups of patients after surgery revealed that the skin temperature, ABI, TcPO2, SWM and VAS of the affected limb were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The expression levels of VEGF, bFGF, EGF and PDGF were significantly higher than before surgery in both groups, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in skin temperature, ABI, TcPO2, SWM, VAS, VEGF, bFGF, EGF and PDGF between the two groups at the corresponding time points preoperatively and postoperatively (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The Periosteal distraction technique can significantly promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. It has the same efficacy as TTT in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcer wounds and improving the peripheral circulation of affected limbs. In addition, the periosteal distraction technique has the advantages of small trauma, simple operation, few complications, and convenient nursing care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Innovative vaginal manipulator technique vs. traditional method for vaginal fornix deployment in robotic sacrocolpopexy. Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a meta-analysis unveiling the learning curve and clinical benefits. Compare three deep learning-based artificial intelligence models for classification of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter diagnostic study. Ureteroinguinal hernia: an added advantage for laparoscopy in the management of inguinal hernia-a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1