肉用鹌鹑饲养动物福利评估规程。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2024.1452109
Antoni Dalmau, Lorena Padilla, Aranzazu Varvaró-Porter, Aida Xercavins, Antonio Velarde, Alexandra Contreras-Jodar
{"title":"肉用鹌鹑饲养动物福利评估规程。","authors":"Antoni Dalmau, Lorena Padilla, Aranzazu Varvaró-Porter, Aida Xercavins, Antonio Velarde, Alexandra Contreras-Jodar","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2024.1452109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is estimated that 1.4 billion quails are reared each year for their eggs and meat, but animal welfare assessment protocols for this species have yet to be established. The objective of this study was to devise an animal welfare assessment protocol developed through a multidimensional approach that contained a number of animal-based indicators (ABIs) for quails (<i>Coturnix japonica</i>) reared for meat production.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During 2021 and 2022, the identical auditor visited and audited 14 Spanish farms in their initial year of integration into an animal welfare certification scheme. The protocol is categorised into 4 principles and 12 criteria. The \"good feeding\" principle includes 6 indicators (1 ABI), \"good housing\" includes 10 indicators (5 ABIs), \"good health\" includes 12 indicators (9 ABIs), and \"appropriate behaviour\" contains 8 indicators (5 ABIs). The final welfare assessment is calculated at the farm level using scores from the on-farm recordings. The assessment is a step-by-step weighted sum of the scores from the various indicators, with the final score ranging between 0 and 100.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The main welfare issues found on all farms were a lack of temperature and humidity records, a poor lighting pattern, and the absence of an outdoor range or access to one. To a lesser degree, it was also found that there were excessive numbers of birds per feeder, the presence of improperly functioning drinkers (i.e., not working, inadequate water flow, or dripping water), poor litter quality, and a high prevalence of birds with dirty plumage and lameness. Despite this, the farms achieved a good overall score, being classified as \"enhanced\" (<i>n</i> = 11) and \"acceptable\" (<i>n</i> = 3). The tool proved helpful in identifying specific welfare issues at the farm level and conducting benchmarking.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animal welfare assessment protocol for quails reared for meat production.\",\"authors\":\"Antoni Dalmau, Lorena Padilla, Aranzazu Varvaró-Porter, Aida Xercavins, Antonio Velarde, Alexandra Contreras-Jodar\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fvets.2024.1452109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is estimated that 1.4 billion quails are reared each year for their eggs and meat, but animal welfare assessment protocols for this species have yet to be established. The objective of this study was to devise an animal welfare assessment protocol developed through a multidimensional approach that contained a number of animal-based indicators (ABIs) for quails (<i>Coturnix japonica</i>) reared for meat production.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During 2021 and 2022, the identical auditor visited and audited 14 Spanish farms in their initial year of integration into an animal welfare certification scheme. The protocol is categorised into 4 principles and 12 criteria. The \\\"good feeding\\\" principle includes 6 indicators (1 ABI), \\\"good housing\\\" includes 10 indicators (5 ABIs), \\\"good health\\\" includes 12 indicators (9 ABIs), and \\\"appropriate behaviour\\\" contains 8 indicators (5 ABIs). The final welfare assessment is calculated at the farm level using scores from the on-farm recordings. The assessment is a step-by-step weighted sum of the scores from the various indicators, with the final score ranging between 0 and 100.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The main welfare issues found on all farms were a lack of temperature and humidity records, a poor lighting pattern, and the absence of an outdoor range or access to one. To a lesser degree, it was also found that there were excessive numbers of birds per feeder, the presence of improperly functioning drinkers (i.e., not working, inadequate water flow, or dripping water), poor litter quality, and a high prevalence of birds with dirty plumage and lameness. Despite this, the farms achieved a good overall score, being classified as \\\"enhanced\\\" (<i>n</i> = 11) and \\\"acceptable\\\" (<i>n</i> = 3). The tool proved helpful in identifying specific welfare issues at the farm level and conducting benchmarking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471728/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1452109\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1452109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:据估计,每年有 14 亿只鹌鹑被饲养用于产蛋和产肉,但针对这一物种的动物福利评估规程尚未制定。本研究的目的是通过多维方法制定动物福利评估规程,该规程包含若干基于动物的指标(ABIs),适用于为肉类生产而饲养的鹌鹑(Coturnix japonica):方法:在 2021 年和 2022 年期间,相同的审核员访问并审核了 14 个西班牙农场,这些农场是纳入动物福利认证计划的第一年。协议分为 4 项原则和 12 项标准。良好饲养 "原则包括 6 项指标(1 项 ABI),"良好饲养 "包括 10 项指标(5 项 ABI),"良好健康 "包括 12 项指标(9 项 ABI),"适当行为 "包括 8 项指标(5 项 ABI)。最终的福利评估是在农场层面利用农场记录的分数计算得出的。评估结果是各项指标得分的逐级加权总和,最终得分介于 0 和 100 之间:在所有农场发现的主要福利问题是缺乏温度和湿度记录、光照不足以及没有室外活动场地或无法使用室外活动场地。其次,还发现每个饲喂器饲喂的家禽数量过多、饮水器功能不正常(即不工作、水流不足或滴水)、粪便质量差、家禽羽毛脏污和跛足的发生率高。尽管如此,这些鸡场的总体得分还是不错的,被归类为 "加强"(11 家)和 "可接受"(3 家)。事实证明,该工具有助于确定猪场层面的具体福利问题并进行基准比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Animal welfare assessment protocol for quails reared for meat production.

Introduction: It is estimated that 1.4 billion quails are reared each year for their eggs and meat, but animal welfare assessment protocols for this species have yet to be established. The objective of this study was to devise an animal welfare assessment protocol developed through a multidimensional approach that contained a number of animal-based indicators (ABIs) for quails (Coturnix japonica) reared for meat production.

Methods: During 2021 and 2022, the identical auditor visited and audited 14 Spanish farms in their initial year of integration into an animal welfare certification scheme. The protocol is categorised into 4 principles and 12 criteria. The "good feeding" principle includes 6 indicators (1 ABI), "good housing" includes 10 indicators (5 ABIs), "good health" includes 12 indicators (9 ABIs), and "appropriate behaviour" contains 8 indicators (5 ABIs). The final welfare assessment is calculated at the farm level using scores from the on-farm recordings. The assessment is a step-by-step weighted sum of the scores from the various indicators, with the final score ranging between 0 and 100.

Results and discussion: The main welfare issues found on all farms were a lack of temperature and humidity records, a poor lighting pattern, and the absence of an outdoor range or access to one. To a lesser degree, it was also found that there were excessive numbers of birds per feeder, the presence of improperly functioning drinkers (i.e., not working, inadequate water flow, or dripping water), poor litter quality, and a high prevalence of birds with dirty plumage and lameness. Despite this, the farms achieved a good overall score, being classified as "enhanced" (n = 11) and "acceptable" (n = 3). The tool proved helpful in identifying specific welfare issues at the farm level and conducting benchmarking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
期刊最新文献
Immuno- and expression analysis of Ehrlichia canis immunoreactive proteins. Integrated analysis of muscle lncRNA and mRNA of Chinese indigenous breed Ningxiang pig in four developmental stages. Pathogenicity potential of enterococci isolated from a Veterinary Biological Isolation and Containment Unit. Perspective: Raman spectroscopy for detection and management of diseases affecting the nervous system. Screening of functional genes for hypoxia adaptation in Tibetan pigs by combined genome resequencing and transcriptome analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1