基于智能手机应用的降压干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Research Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1038/s41440-024-01939-6
Makiko Abe, Tetsuo Hirata, Natsumi Morito, Megumi Kawashima, Sumiko Yoshida, Yoichi Takami, Taku Fujimoto, Shin Kawasoe, Takeshi Shibukawa, Hiroyoshi Segawa, Toshitaka Yamanokuchi, Shintaro Ishida, Koji Takahashi, Kazuhiro Tada, Yoshifumi Kato, Atsushi Sakima, Hisatomi Arima
{"title":"基于智能手机应用的降压干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Makiko Abe, Tetsuo Hirata, Natsumi Morito, Megumi Kawashima, Sumiko Yoshida, Yoichi Takami, Taku Fujimoto, Shin Kawasoe, Takeshi Shibukawa, Hiroyoshi Segawa, Toshitaka Yamanokuchi, Shintaro Ishida, Koji Takahashi, Kazuhiro Tada, Yoshifumi Kato, Atsushi Sakima, Hisatomi Arima","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01939-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nowadays, the mHealth market is flooded with smartphone applications (apps) lacking validation for blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and BP measurement accuracy. This systematic review for Guidelines for BP control using digital technologies of the Japanese Society of Hypertension aimed to assess the validation studies of apps. We searched eligible studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi, focusing on randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the effects of smartphone app-based interventions with non-digital healthcare. Random effects models of meta-analysis were employed to estimate the pooled effects of mean BP change and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Out of 7385 studies screened, 76 studies with 46,459 participants were included. The interventions were significantly associated with a reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP at six months (systolic BP, -2.76 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.94 to -1.58; diastolic BP, -1.23 mmHg, -1.80 to -0.67). Normotensives saw a significant reduction in office systolic BP at three-month (-4.44 mmHg, -6.96 to -1.92), diminishing afterward (six-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52; twelve-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52). Conversely, hypertensive participants experienced a significant reduction in office systolic BP at both three- and six-month (three-month, -7.71 mmHg, -10.63 to -4.79; six-month, -1.88 mmHg, -3.41 to -0.35), albeit with limited evidence thereafter. A larger BP reduction was observed among participants using apps with wireless transmission of BP measurements (P = 0.047 for interaction), while there was no clear difference in BP reduction according to the presence of other functions. Smartphone app-based interventions may hold the potential to improve BP levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone application-based intervention to lower blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Makiko Abe, Tetsuo Hirata, Natsumi Morito, Megumi Kawashima, Sumiko Yoshida, Yoichi Takami, Taku Fujimoto, Shin Kawasoe, Takeshi Shibukawa, Hiroyoshi Segawa, Toshitaka Yamanokuchi, Shintaro Ishida, Koji Takahashi, Kazuhiro Tada, Yoshifumi Kato, Atsushi Sakima, Hisatomi Arima\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41440-024-01939-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nowadays, the mHealth market is flooded with smartphone applications (apps) lacking validation for blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and BP measurement accuracy. This systematic review for Guidelines for BP control using digital technologies of the Japanese Society of Hypertension aimed to assess the validation studies of apps. We searched eligible studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi, focusing on randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the effects of smartphone app-based interventions with non-digital healthcare. Random effects models of meta-analysis were employed to estimate the pooled effects of mean BP change and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Out of 7385 studies screened, 76 studies with 46,459 participants were included. The interventions were significantly associated with a reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP at six months (systolic BP, -2.76 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.94 to -1.58; diastolic BP, -1.23 mmHg, -1.80 to -0.67). Normotensives saw a significant reduction in office systolic BP at three-month (-4.44 mmHg, -6.96 to -1.92), diminishing afterward (six-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52; twelve-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52). Conversely, hypertensive participants experienced a significant reduction in office systolic BP at both three- and six-month (three-month, -7.71 mmHg, -10.63 to -4.79; six-month, -1.88 mmHg, -3.41 to -0.35), albeit with limited evidence thereafter. A larger BP reduction was observed among participants using apps with wireless transmission of BP measurements (P = 0.047 for interaction), while there was no clear difference in BP reduction according to the presence of other functions. Smartphone app-based interventions may hold the potential to improve BP levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01939-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01939-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,移动保健市场上充斥着大量智能手机应用程序(App),这些应用程序缺乏对降压效果和血压测量准确性的验证。本系统综述针对日本高血压学会的《使用数字技术控制血压指南》,旨在评估应用程序的验证研究。我们在 Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane Library 和 Ichushi 中检索了符合条件的研究,重点关注比较基于智能手机应用程序的干预措施与非数字医疗保健效果的随机对照试验和观察性研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型来估算平均血压变化的集合效应和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。在筛选出的 7385 项研究中,有 76 项研究纳入了 46459 名参与者。干预措施与六个月后办公室收缩压和舒张压的降低有明显相关性(收缩压,-2.76 mmHg,95% CI:-3.94 至 -1.58 ;舒张压,-1.23 mmHg,-1.80 至 -0.67)。血压正常者的办公室收缩压在三个月时显著降低(-4.44 mmHg,-6.96 至-1.92),之后逐渐降低(六个月,0.86 mmHg,-2.81 至 4.52;十二个月,0.86 mmHg,-2.81 至 4.52)。相反,高血压患者的办公室收缩压在三个月和六个月时都有显著下降(三个月,-7.71 mmHg,-10.63 至 -4.79;六个月,-1.88 mmHg,-3.41 至 -0.35),尽管随后的降幅有限。使用无线传输血压测量值的应用程序的参与者的血压降低幅度更大(交互作用 P = 0.047),而血压降低幅度与是否具有其他功能没有明显差异。基于智能手机应用程序的干预措施可能具有改善血压水平的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smartphone application-based intervention to lower blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nowadays, the mHealth market is flooded with smartphone applications (apps) lacking validation for blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and BP measurement accuracy. This systematic review for Guidelines for BP control using digital technologies of the Japanese Society of Hypertension aimed to assess the validation studies of apps. We searched eligible studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi, focusing on randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the effects of smartphone app-based interventions with non-digital healthcare. Random effects models of meta-analysis were employed to estimate the pooled effects of mean BP change and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Out of 7385 studies screened, 76 studies with 46,459 participants were included. The interventions were significantly associated with a reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP at six months (systolic BP, -2.76 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.94 to -1.58; diastolic BP, -1.23 mmHg, -1.80 to -0.67). Normotensives saw a significant reduction in office systolic BP at three-month (-4.44 mmHg, -6.96 to -1.92), diminishing afterward (six-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52; twelve-month, 0.86 mmHg, -2.81 to 4.52). Conversely, hypertensive participants experienced a significant reduction in office systolic BP at both three- and six-month (three-month, -7.71 mmHg, -10.63 to -4.79; six-month, -1.88 mmHg, -3.41 to -0.35), albeit with limited evidence thereafter. A larger BP reduction was observed among participants using apps with wireless transmission of BP measurements (P = 0.047 for interaction), while there was no clear difference in BP reduction according to the presence of other functions. Smartphone app-based interventions may hold the potential to improve BP levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of echocardiographic findings in patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas: adrenalectomy versus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Could this be the first step towards a tailor-made lifestyle modification? Establishment of a HFpEF model using female Dahl salt-sensitive rats: a valuable tool for elucidating the pathophysiology of HFpEF in women. Participating in ISH 2024. Resistance exercise has an antihypertensive effect comparable to that of aerobic exercise in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1