Phenotypic Characterisation of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background: Recent neutral randomised clinical trials have created clinical equipoise for treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) for managing cardiovascular risk. The importance of defining the links between OSA and cardiovascular disease is needed with the aim of advancing the robustness of future clinical trials. We aimed to define the clinical correlates and characterise surrogate cardiovascular markers in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and OSA.

Method: Overall, 66 patients diagnosed with ACS were studied. Patients underwent an unattended polysomnogram after hospital discharge (median [interquartile range] 62 [37-132] days). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin, and STOP-BANG questionnaires were administered. Surrogate measures of vascular structure and function, and cardiovascular autonomic function were conducted. Pulse wave amplitude drop was derived from the pulse oximetry signals of the overnight polysomnogram.

Results: OSA (apnoea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥5) was diagnosed in 94% of patients. Moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI≥15) was observed in 68% of patients. Daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥10) was reported in 17% of patients. OSA screening questionnaires were inadequate to identify moderate-to-severe OSA, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of approximately 0.64. Arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, 6.1 [5.2-6.8] vs 7.4 [6.6-8.6] m/s, p=0.002) and carotid intima-media thickness (0.8 [0.7-1.0] vs 0.9 [0.8-1.0] mm, p=0.027) was elevated in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA. After adjusting for age, sex and body mass index, these relationships were not statistically significant. No relationships were observed in other surrogate cardiovascular markers.

Conclusions: A high prevalence of OSA in a mostly non-sleepy population with ACS was identified, highlighting a gross underdiagnosis of OSA among cardiovascular patients. The limitations of OSA screening questionnaires highlight the need for new models of OSA screening as part of cardiovascular risk management. A range of inconsistent abnormalities were observed in measures of vascular structure and function, and these appear to be largely explained by confounding factors. Further research is required to elucidate biomarkers for the presence and impact of OSA in ACS patients.