Anton Kazantsev, Alexander Korotkikh, Roman Leader, Sergey Artyukhov, Lyudmila Roshkovskaya, Vladimir Unguryan, Maxim Chernyavin, Belov Yury
{"title":"不同年龄组颈动脉内膜切除术后一年的疗效:俄罗斯多中心研究。","authors":"Anton Kazantsev, Alexander Korotkikh, Roman Leader, Sergey Artyukhov, Lyudmila Roshkovskaya, Vladimir Unguryan, Maxim Chernyavin, Belov Yury","doi":"10.1007/s12055-024-01753-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort, comparative, retrospective, open-label study for the period from 2008 to 2020 included 7248 patients with hemodynamically significant stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA), who underwent CEA. According to the classification of the World Health Organization, patients were divided into groups depending on age: up to 44 years-young age (<i>n</i> = 84); 45-60 years-middle age (<i>n</i> = 1635); 61-75-elderly age (<i>n</i> = 4817); over 75 years-senile age (<i>n</i> = 712).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of the frequency of hospital complications, the group of patients over 75 years of age experienced the largest number of cardiovascular events. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between groups: death (group 1, 1.2%; group 2, 0.5%; group 3, 0.4%; group 4, 1%; <i>p</i> = 0.14), myocardial infarction (group 1, 1.2%; group 2, 0.3%; group 3, 0.14%; group 4, 0.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.12), stroke (group 1, 0%; group 2, 0.3%; group 3, 0.1%; group 4, 0.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The largest number of adverse cardiovascular events after CEA are observed among patients over 75 years of age, which is due to the high frequency of multivessel coronary lesions, atrial fibrillation, and the severity of the comorbidities. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One year outcomes following of carotid endarterectomy in different age groups: Russian multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Anton Kazantsev, Alexander Korotkikh, Roman Leader, Sergey Artyukhov, Lyudmila Roshkovskaya, Vladimir Unguryan, Maxim Chernyavin, Belov Yury\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12055-024-01753-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort, comparative, retrospective, open-label study for the period from 2008 to 2020 included 7248 patients with hemodynamically significant stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA), who underwent CEA. According to the classification of the World Health Organization, patients were divided into groups depending on age: up to 44 years-young age (<i>n</i> = 84); 45-60 years-middle age (<i>n</i> = 1635); 61-75-elderly age (<i>n</i> = 4817); over 75 years-senile age (<i>n</i> = 712).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of the frequency of hospital complications, the group of patients over 75 years of age experienced the largest number of cardiovascular events. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between groups: death (group 1, 1.2%; group 2, 0.5%; group 3, 0.4%; group 4, 1%; <i>p</i> = 0.14), myocardial infarction (group 1, 1.2%; group 2, 0.3%; group 3, 0.14%; group 4, 0.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.12), stroke (group 1, 0%; group 2, 0.3%; group 3, 0.1%; group 4, 0.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The largest number of adverse cardiovascular events after CEA are observed among patients over 75 years of age, which is due to the high frequency of multivessel coronary lesions, atrial fibrillation, and the severity of the comorbidities. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-024-01753-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-024-01753-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
One year outcomes following of carotid endarterectomy in different age groups: Russian multicenter study.
Introduction: This is a retrospective analysis of the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in different age groups.
Methods: This cohort, comparative, retrospective, open-label study for the period from 2008 to 2020 included 7248 patients with hemodynamically significant stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA), who underwent CEA. According to the classification of the World Health Organization, patients were divided into groups depending on age: up to 44 years-young age (n = 84); 45-60 years-middle age (n = 1635); 61-75-elderly age (n = 4817); over 75 years-senile age (n = 712).
Results: In terms of the frequency of hospital complications, the group of patients over 75 years of age experienced the largest number of cardiovascular events. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between groups: death (group 1, 1.2%; group 2, 0.5%; group 3, 0.4%; group 4, 1%; p = 0.14), myocardial infarction (group 1, 1.2%; group 2, 0.3%; group 3, 0.14%; group 4, 0.3%; p = 0.12), stroke (group 1, 0%; group 2, 0.3%; group 3, 0.1%; group 4, 0.4%; p = 0.32).
Conclusion: The largest number of adverse cardiovascular events after CEA are observed among patients over 75 years of age, which is due to the high frequency of multivessel coronary lesions, atrial fibrillation, and the severity of the comorbidities. One year after surgery, there were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between groups.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.