用神经生理学和行为学指标描述针对认知功能障碍的中风后患者的两种混合运动-认知训练干预措施:随机对照试验。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3482328
Chia-Lun Liu;Shou-Hsien Huang;Wei-Chun Wang;Chih-Kuang Chen;Ken-Hsien Su;Ching-Yi Wu
{"title":"用神经生理学和行为学指标描述针对认知功能障碍的中风后患者的两种混合运动-认知训练干预措施:随机对照试验。","authors":"Chia-Lun Liu;Shou-Hsien Huang;Wei-Chun Wang;Chih-Kuang Chen;Ken-Hsien Su;Ching-Yi Wu","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3482328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combined exercise and cognitive training have been evidenced to be effective in cognitive and physical functions in post-stroke survivors. Recent interest has gradually shifted to technology-aided cognitive rehabilitation. However, clear neural makers or comprehensive behavioral indexes used for evaluating rehabilitation remain unexplored. The study aimed to examine the effects of two types of combined exercise-cognitive training on stroke patients with cognitive dysfunction, focusing on neural and behavioral markers. 39 patients were randomly assigned to sequential exercise-cognitive training, simultaneous exercise-cognitive training or active control groups and underwent 60 minutes/day training, 3 days/week, for 12 weeks. 29 patients ultimately completed the training. The markers/indexes included cognitive function, physical function, instrumental activities of daily living, and caregiver strain. Cognitive function included working memory task performance, neurophysiological markers, and cognitive indexes. The results indicated no d-prime difference between groups after the training. The simultaneous training demonstrated significant improvements in the neurophysiological marker of P300 and theta coherence compared to the other groups. Moreover, the simultaneous training also led to significant enhancements in physical function, as measured by the Rivermead Mobility Index, comparing to the other groups. Further analysis contrasting the two exercise-cognitive trainings revealed that improvements in cognition and multifaceted domains (i.e., instrumental activities of daily living and caregiver strain) were manifested in the simultaneous training. Together with the neural markers identified in the current interventions, the differential impacts of the two interventions indicates the potential of technology-driven and personalized rehabilitation in post-stroke patients.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"32 ","pages":"3913-3922"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10720930","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Two Hybrid Exercise-Cognitive Training Interventions With Neurophysiological and Behavioral Indexes in Post-Stroke Patients With Cognitive Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Lun Liu;Shou-Hsien Huang;Wei-Chun Wang;Chih-Kuang Chen;Ken-Hsien Su;Ching-Yi Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3482328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Combined exercise and cognitive training have been evidenced to be effective in cognitive and physical functions in post-stroke survivors. Recent interest has gradually shifted to technology-aided cognitive rehabilitation. However, clear neural makers or comprehensive behavioral indexes used for evaluating rehabilitation remain unexplored. The study aimed to examine the effects of two types of combined exercise-cognitive training on stroke patients with cognitive dysfunction, focusing on neural and behavioral markers. 39 patients were randomly assigned to sequential exercise-cognitive training, simultaneous exercise-cognitive training or active control groups and underwent 60 minutes/day training, 3 days/week, for 12 weeks. 29 patients ultimately completed the training. The markers/indexes included cognitive function, physical function, instrumental activities of daily living, and caregiver strain. Cognitive function included working memory task performance, neurophysiological markers, and cognitive indexes. The results indicated no d-prime difference between groups after the training. The simultaneous training demonstrated significant improvements in the neurophysiological marker of P300 and theta coherence compared to the other groups. Moreover, the simultaneous training also led to significant enhancements in physical function, as measured by the Rivermead Mobility Index, comparing to the other groups. Further analysis contrasting the two exercise-cognitive trainings revealed that improvements in cognition and multifaceted domains (i.e., instrumental activities of daily living and caregiver strain) were manifested in the simultaneous training. Together with the neural markers identified in the current interventions, the differential impacts of the two interventions indicates the potential of technology-driven and personalized rehabilitation in post-stroke patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"3913-3922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10720930\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10720930/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10720930/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,运动和认知训练相结合,对中风后幸存者的认知和身体功能都很有效。最近,人们的兴趣逐渐转向了技术辅助认知康复。然而,用于评估康复的明确的神经制造商或综合行为指标仍有待探索。本研究旨在研究两种类型的运动-认知联合训练对认知功能障碍中风患者的影响,重点关注神经和行为指标。39 名患者被随机分配到顺序运动认知训练组、同步运动认知训练组或积极对照组,接受为期 12 周、每天 60 分钟、每周 3 天的训练。最终有 29 名患者完成了训练。指标/指数包括认知功能、身体功能、日常生活工具活动和照顾者压力。认知功能包括工作记忆任务表现、神经生理指标和认知指数。结果表明,训练后组间无 dprime 差异。与其他组相比,同步训练在神经生理指标 P300 和 Theta 相干性方面有明显改善。此外,与其他组相比,通过里弗米德活动指数(Rivermead Mobility Index)测量,同步训练还显著提高了身体功能。对两种运动-认知训练的进一步对比分析表明,同步训练在认知和多方面领域(即日常生活工具性活动和照顾者的压力)都有所改善。结合目前干预措施中发现的神经标记,两种干预措施的不同影响表明了技术驱动和个性化康复在中风后患者中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing Two Hybrid Exercise-Cognitive Training Interventions With Neurophysiological and Behavioral Indexes in Post-Stroke Patients With Cognitive Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Combined exercise and cognitive training have been evidenced to be effective in cognitive and physical functions in post-stroke survivors. Recent interest has gradually shifted to technology-aided cognitive rehabilitation. However, clear neural makers or comprehensive behavioral indexes used for evaluating rehabilitation remain unexplored. The study aimed to examine the effects of two types of combined exercise-cognitive training on stroke patients with cognitive dysfunction, focusing on neural and behavioral markers. 39 patients were randomly assigned to sequential exercise-cognitive training, simultaneous exercise-cognitive training or active control groups and underwent 60 minutes/day training, 3 days/week, for 12 weeks. 29 patients ultimately completed the training. The markers/indexes included cognitive function, physical function, instrumental activities of daily living, and caregiver strain. Cognitive function included working memory task performance, neurophysiological markers, and cognitive indexes. The results indicated no d-prime difference between groups after the training. The simultaneous training demonstrated significant improvements in the neurophysiological marker of P300 and theta coherence compared to the other groups. Moreover, the simultaneous training also led to significant enhancements in physical function, as measured by the Rivermead Mobility Index, comparing to the other groups. Further analysis contrasting the two exercise-cognitive trainings revealed that improvements in cognition and multifaceted domains (i.e., instrumental activities of daily living and caregiver strain) were manifested in the simultaneous training. Together with the neural markers identified in the current interventions, the differential impacts of the two interventions indicates the potential of technology-driven and personalized rehabilitation in post-stroke patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
期刊最新文献
Semi-Autonomous Continuous Robotic Arm Control Using an Augmented Reality Brain-Computer Interface Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation on Fingertip Can Evoke Fine Tactile Sensations and Different Local Hemodynamic Responses The Neural Basis of the Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Emotion Regulation Related Brain Regions: An rs-fMRI Study An Asynchronous Training-free SSVEP-BCI Detection Algorithm for Non-Equal Prior Probability Scenarios. A Swing-Assist Controller for Enhancing Knee Flexion in a Semi-Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1