用于检测乳腺放射治疗中急性放射性皮炎的多模式光声/弹性成像。

Keen Yang, Yucong Zhang, Shiyu Li, Liqianqi Chen, Xianming Li, Zihuang Li, Dong Yang, Kun Mao, Rencui Quan, Jinfeng Xu, Gang Xu, Fajin Dong
{"title":"用于检测乳腺放射治疗中急性放射性皮炎的多模式光声/弹性成像。","authors":"Keen Yang, Yucong Zhang, Shiyu Li, Liqianqi Chen, Xianming Li, Zihuang Li, Dong Yang, Kun Mao, Rencui Quan, Jinfeng Xu, Gang Xu, Fajin Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether photoacoustic (PA), sound touch elastography (STE), and viscoelasticity (VE) can distinguish between normal and abnormal postradiation therapy breast skin and compare these methods with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria at a 20 Gy threshold.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent PA, STE, and VE on the same day. Collected data included radiation dose, molecular type, RTOG, Fitzpatrick skin type, pathology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) classification, surgical procedures, primary breast cancer location, body mass index, and age. A sample of 41 patients was determined using a 2-sample t test. Statistical tools such as t-tests, variance analysis, rank sum tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests, along with random forest analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves, were used to evaluate the radiation dose effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 66 patients showed significant differences in parameters such as dermis and subcutaneous tissue oxygen saturation, dermal thickness, and skin elasticity (P values < .05). However, minimum values of oxygen saturation and some photoacoustic measures were not significantly different. Notably, at a 20 Gy radiation threshold, significant variations in oxygen saturation, abnormal dermal thickness, and skin STE and VE were observed, proving more accurate than RTOG grading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that PA and elastography imaging are effective in differentiating between normal and abnormal breast tissue and assessing radiation-induced changes, thereby highlighting the potential of these imaging techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Photoacoustic/Elastography Imaging for the Detection of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Keen Yang, Yucong Zhang, Shiyu Li, Liqianqi Chen, Xianming Li, Zihuang Li, Dong Yang, Kun Mao, Rencui Quan, Jinfeng Xu, Gang Xu, Fajin Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether photoacoustic (PA), sound touch elastography (STE), and viscoelasticity (VE) can distinguish between normal and abnormal postradiation therapy breast skin and compare these methods with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria at a 20 Gy threshold.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent PA, STE, and VE on the same day. Collected data included radiation dose, molecular type, RTOG, Fitzpatrick skin type, pathology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) classification, surgical procedures, primary breast cancer location, body mass index, and age. A sample of 41 patients was determined using a 2-sample t test. Statistical tools such as t-tests, variance analysis, rank sum tests, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests, along with random forest analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves, were used to evaluate the radiation dose effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 66 patients showed significant differences in parameters such as dermis and subcutaneous tissue oxygen saturation, dermal thickness, and skin elasticity (P values < .05). However, minimum values of oxygen saturation and some photoacoustic measures were not significantly different. Notably, at a 20 Gy radiation threshold, significant variations in oxygen saturation, abnormal dermal thickness, and skin STE and VE were observed, proving more accurate than RTOG grading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that PA and elastography imaging are effective in differentiating between normal and abnormal breast tissue and assessing radiation-induced changes, thereby highlighting the potential of these imaging techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了光声(PA)、声触弹性成像(STE)和粘弹性(VE)是否能区分放疗后乳房皮肤的正常和异常,并将这些方法与 20 Gy 临界值的 RTOG 标准进行了比较:符合纳入和排除标准的患者在同一天接受 PA、STE 和 VE 检查。收集的数据包括辐射剂量、分子类型、RTOG、菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型、病理学、新辅助化疗状态、TNM 分类、手术过程、原发性乳腺癌位置、体重指数和年龄。采用双样本 t 检验确定了 41 位患者的样本。采用T检验、方差分析、秩和检验、卡方检验等统计工具以及随机森林分析和ROC曲线来评估辐射剂量效应:66名患者的数据显示,真皮和皮下组织氧饱和度、真皮厚度和皮肤弹性等参数存在明显差异(P值小于0.05)。不过,氧饱和度的最低值和一些光声测量值没有明显差异。值得注意的是,在 20 Gy 辐射阈值下,观察到氧饱和度、真皮异常厚度、皮肤 STE 和 VE 有明显变化,证明比 RTOG 分级更准确:该研究证实了 PA 和弹性成像在区分正常和异常乳腺组织以及评估辐射引起的变化方面的有效性,凸显了这些成像技术的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multimodal Photoacoustic/Elastography Imaging for the Detection of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether photoacoustic (PA), sound touch elastography (STE), and viscoelasticity (VE) can distinguish between normal and abnormal postradiation therapy breast skin and compare these methods with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria at a 20 Gy threshold.

Methods and materials: Patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent PA, STE, and VE on the same day. Collected data included radiation dose, molecular type, RTOG, Fitzpatrick skin type, pathology, neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) classification, surgical procedures, primary breast cancer location, body mass index, and age. A sample of 41 patients was determined using a 2-sample t test. Statistical tools such as t-tests, variance analysis, rank sum tests, and χ2 tests, along with random forest analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves, were used to evaluate the radiation dose effects.

Results: Data from 66 patients showed significant differences in parameters such as dermis and subcutaneous tissue oxygen saturation, dermal thickness, and skin elasticity (P values < .05). However, minimum values of oxygen saturation and some photoacoustic measures were not significantly different. Notably, at a 20 Gy radiation threshold, significant variations in oxygen saturation, abnormal dermal thickness, and skin STE and VE were observed, proving more accurate than RTOG grading.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that PA and elastography imaging are effective in differentiating between normal and abnormal breast tissue and assessing radiation-induced changes, thereby highlighting the potential of these imaging techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk. The association of linear energy transfer and dose with radiation necrosis after pencil beam scanning proton therapy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors: Association of dose and LET with radiation necrosis. Data-Driven Volumetric CT Image Generation from Surface Structures using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model. Phase II trial of consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer after staging surgery: a phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1