Indrin J Chetty, Bin Cai, Michael D Chuong, Samantha L Dawes, William A Hall, Amanda R Helms, Suzanne Kirby, Eric Laugeman, Michelle Mierzwa, Jennifer Pursley, Xenia Ray, Ergys Subashi, Lauren E Henke
{"title":"自适应放射治疗的质量和安全考虑因素:ASTRO白皮书:ASTRO ART 安全白皮书。","authors":"Indrin J Chetty, Bin Cai, Michael D Chuong, Samantha L Dawes, William A Hall, Amanda R Helms, Suzanne Kirby, Eric Laugeman, Michelle Mierzwa, Jennifer Pursley, Xenia Ray, Ergys Subashi, Lauren E Henke","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from \"strongly agree\" to \"strongly disagree.\" A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting \"strongly agree\" or \"agree\" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and Safety Considerations for Adaptive Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO White Paper.\",\"authors\":\"Indrin J Chetty, Bin Cai, Michael D Chuong, Samantha L Dawes, William A Hall, Amanda R Helms, Suzanne Kirby, Eric Laugeman, Michelle Mierzwa, Jennifer Pursley, Xenia Ray, Ergys Subashi, Lauren E Henke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from \\\"strongly agree\\\" to \\\"strongly disagree.\\\" A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting \\\"strongly agree\\\" or \\\"agree\\\" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:自适应放射治疗(ART)是美国放射肿瘤学会(American Society for Radiation Oncology)针对质量流程和患者安全发布的系列白皮书中的最新主题。自适应放射治疗通过提高靶点放射剂量的精确度来扩大治疗指数,允许剂量升级和/或将正常组织所受剂量降至最低。ART 可通过离线或在线方法进行;离线 ART 是在两次分次治疗之间重新规划患者治疗计划的过程,而在线 ART 则涉及患者在治疗台上的计划调整。这是通过室内成像实现的,能够评估解剖学变化,并能在治疗过程中快速重新优化治疗方案。尽管 ART 以最简单的形式出现在临床实践中已有几十年,但最近的技术发展使 ART 的临床应用更加广泛。随着 ART 临床应用的增加、时间的压缩和相关的复杂性,质量和安全方面的考虑成为一个重要的关注领域:方法:ASTRO 召集了一个跨学科工作组,就 ART 的关键工作流程和过程达成专家共识。采用建立共识的方法提出建议,工作组成员根据李克特五点量表(从 "非常同意 "到 "非常不同意")表示同意程度。预设阈值为≥75%的评分者选择 "非常同意 "或 "同意",表示达成共识。小结:建立和维护适应性计划需要团队合作、经过适当培训和认证的专家以及大量资源、专业技术和实施时间。必须利用既定指南制定全面的质量保证计划,确保以安全有效的方式开展各种形式的抗逆转录病毒疗法。提供抗逆转录病毒疗法时的患者安全是每个人的责任,专业组织、监管机构、供应商和最终用户必须明确承诺共同努力,提供最高水平的质量和安全。
Quality and Safety Considerations for Adaptive Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO White Paper.
Purpose: Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is the latest topic in a series of white papers published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing quality processes and patient safety. ART widens the therapeutic index by improving the precision of radiation dose to targets, allowing for dose escalation and/or minimization of dose to normal tissue. ART is performed via offline or online methods; offline ART is the process of replanning a patient's treatment plan between fractions, whereas online ART involves plan adjustment with the patient on the treatment table. This is achieved with in-room imaging capable of assessing anatomic changes and the ability to reoptimize the treatment plan rapidly during the treatment session. Although ART has occurred in its simplest forms in clinical practice for decades, recent technological developments have enabled more clinical applications of ART. With increased clinical prevalence, compressed timelines, and the associated complexity of ART, quality and safety considerations are an important focus area.
Methods: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to provide expert consensus on key workflows and processes for ART. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale, from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of ≥75% of raters selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus. Content not meeting this threshold was removed or revised.
Summary: Establishing and maintaining an adaptive program requires a team-based approach, appropriately trained and credentialed specialists, significant resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A comprehensive quality assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to make sure all forms of ART are performed in a safe and effective manner. Patient safety when delivering ART is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to deliver the highest levels of quality and safety.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.