重新定义 FLASH RT:平均剂量率和每次脉冲剂量对胃肠道的影响。

Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, Edgardo Aguilar, Nefetiti Mims, Denae Neill, Abagail Delahoussaye, Ziyi Li, David Swanson, Steven H Lin, Albert C Koong, Cullen M Taniguchi, Billy W Loo, Devarati Mitra, Emil Schüler
{"title":"重新定义 FLASH RT:平均剂量率和每次脉冲剂量对胃肠道的影响。","authors":"Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, Edgardo Aguilar, Nefetiti Mims, Denae Neill, Abagail Delahoussaye, Ziyi Li, David Swanson, Steven H Lin, Albert C Koong, Cullen M Taniguchi, Billy W Loo, Devarati Mitra, Emil Schüler","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. We sought to systematically evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>C57BL/6J mice received total abdominal irradiation (TAI, 11-14 Gy single fraction) through either conventional (CONV) irradiation (low-DPP and low MDR, CONV) or through various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate beam conditions. DPPs ranging from 1 to 6 Gy were evaluated, while the total dose and MDR (>100 Gy/s) were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range of 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s, while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. Radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity was quantified in nontumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to an increase in sparing (an increase in the number of regenerating crypts), with a more prominent effect seen at 12- and 14-Gy TAI. Interestingly, at DPPs of >4 Gy, a similar level of crypt sparing was demonstrated irrespective of the MDR used (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high-DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV irrespective of MDR. However, at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, an MDR of 104 Gy/s produced a greater survival effect compared with 0.3 Gy/s. We also confirmed that high-DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high-DPP and ultra-high-dose-rate appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of gastrointestinal toxicity while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining FLASH Radiation Therapy: The Impact of Mean Dose Rate and Dose Per Pulse in the Gastrointestinal Tract.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, Edgardo Aguilar, Nefetiti Mims, Denae Neill, Abagail Delahoussaye, Ziyi Li, David Swanson, Steven H Lin, Albert C Koong, Cullen M Taniguchi, Billy W Loo, Devarati Mitra, Emil Schüler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. We sought to systematically evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>C57BL/6J mice received total abdominal irradiation (TAI, 11-14 Gy single fraction) through either conventional (CONV) irradiation (low-DPP and low MDR, CONV) or through various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate beam conditions. DPPs ranging from 1 to 6 Gy were evaluated, while the total dose and MDR (>100 Gy/s) were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range of 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s, while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. Radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity was quantified in nontumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to an increase in sparing (an increase in the number of regenerating crypts), with a more prominent effect seen at 12- and 14-Gy TAI. Interestingly, at DPPs of >4 Gy, a similar level of crypt sparing was demonstrated irrespective of the MDR used (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high-DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV irrespective of MDR. However, at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, an MDR of 104 Gy/s produced a greater survival effect compared with 0.3 Gy/s. We also confirmed that high-DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high-DPP and ultra-high-dose-rate appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of gastrointestinal toxicity while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对不同辐射束参数设置如何影响FLASH效应的诱导和程度的了解仍然有限:目的:我们试图系统地评估辐射诱导的胃肠道毒性(RIGIT)的大小如何取决于平均剂量率(MDR)和每脉冲剂量(DPP)之间的相互作用:方法:C57BL/6J小鼠通过常规照射(低DPP和低MDR,CONV)或通过DPP和MDR的不同组合直至超高剂量率(UHDR)射束条件接受全腹照射(11-14 Gy,单次)。在总剂量和 MDR(>100 Gy/s)保持不变的情况下,对 1 Gy 至 6 Gy 的 DPP 进行了评估;在总剂量和 DPP 保持不变的情况下,对 0.3-1440 Gy/s 范围内的 MDR 影响进行了评估。通过再生隐窝试验和存活率评估对非肿瘤小鼠的 RIGIT 进行量化。肿瘤反应通过肿瘤生长延迟进行评估:结果:在使用恒定 MDR(>100 Gy/s)的每个测试总剂量内,DPP 的增加都会导致稀释的增加(再生隐窝数量的增加),在 12 和 14 Gy TAI 时效果更为显著。有趣的是,当 DPP 大于 4 Gy 时,无论使用何种 MDR(从 0.3 Gy 到 1440 Gy/s),都能显示出类似程度的隐窝疏通。在 4.7 Gy 的固定高 DPP 下,无论 MDR 如何,相对于 CONV,生存率都得到了同等程度的改善。然而,在 0.93 Gy 的较低 DPP 下,与 0.3 Gy/s 相比,104 Gy/s 的 MDR 产生了更大的生存效果。我们还利用临床相关的黑色素瘤小鼠模型证实,无论MDR如何,高DPP都能产生与CONV相同程度的肿瘤生长延迟:本研究表明,光束参数设置对 FLASH 效果的大小有很大影响。高DPP和UHDR似乎都足以独立产生FLASH,消除消化道毒性,同时在所有条件下都能保持等效肿瘤反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Redefining FLASH Radiation Therapy: The Impact of Mean Dose Rate and Dose Per Pulse in the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Purpose: The understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. We sought to systematically evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP).

Methods and materials: C57BL/6J mice received total abdominal irradiation (TAI, 11-14 Gy single fraction) through either conventional (CONV) irradiation (low-DPP and low MDR, CONV) or through various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate beam conditions. DPPs ranging from 1 to 6 Gy were evaluated, while the total dose and MDR (>100 Gy/s) were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range of 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s, while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. Radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity was quantified in nontumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay.

Results: Within each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to an increase in sparing (an increase in the number of regenerating crypts), with a more prominent effect seen at 12- and 14-Gy TAI. Interestingly, at DPPs of >4 Gy, a similar level of crypt sparing was demonstrated irrespective of the MDR used (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high-DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV irrespective of MDR. However, at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, an MDR of 104 Gy/s produced a greater survival effect compared with 0.3 Gy/s. We also confirmed that high-DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high-DPP and ultra-high-dose-rate appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of gastrointestinal toxicity while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk. The association of linear energy transfer and dose with radiation necrosis after pencil beam scanning proton therapy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors: Association of dose and LET with radiation necrosis. Data-Driven Volumetric CT Image Generation from Surface Structures using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model. Phase II trial of consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer after staging surgery: a phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1