瑞士和奥地利 THA 的成本和资源比较分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000321
Stefan Blümel, Matthieu Hanauer, Alexander Heimann, Moritz Tannast, Joseph M Schwab
{"title":"瑞士和奥地利 THA 的成本和资源比较分析。","authors":"Stefan Blümel, Matthieu Hanauer, Alexander Heimann, Moritz Tannast, Joseph M Schwab","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324000321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an orthopedic intervention that generates substantial costs to national healthcare systems due to the number of interventions and the cost per intervention. We performed a cost comparison analysis in Austria and Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the national joint arthroplasty register in Switzerland and internal information from the national healthcare services in Austria and Switzerland were compared for patient demographics, interventional characteristics, and costs adjusted for inflation and purchasing power from 2015 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age for primary THA in Austria was from 67.4 to 67.8 years with 55.9-57.2 percent female patients and from 68.5 to 69.3 years with 52.4-53.8 percent female patients in Switzerland. The annual incidence rate for primary THA rose from 210.28/100k to 216.6/100k in Austria and from 212/100k to 250/100k in Switzerland. After correction for inflation, costs were -1.91 percent lower in Austria in 2021 than in 2015 and -2.57 percent lower in Switzerland. After correction for purchasing power, costs were higher in Austria. The average hospital stay after THA in Austria was reduced by 20 percent (11.7 days/2015 vs. 9.4 days/2021) and 25 percent in Switzerland (8.4 days/2015 vs. 6.4 days/2021). Revision rate was 2.5-3.2 percent in Austria and 2.8-3.2 percent in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient population was comparable while patients undergoing primary THA in Austria stay longer in hospital and have relatively higher costs when adjusted for currency, purchasing power, and inflation. The use of standardized registers would be helpful to compare outcomes and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"e36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost and resource comparison analysis for THA in Switzerland and Austria.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Blümel, Matthieu Hanauer, Alexander Heimann, Moritz Tannast, Joseph M Schwab\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462324000321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an orthopedic intervention that generates substantial costs to national healthcare systems due to the number of interventions and the cost per intervention. We performed a cost comparison analysis in Austria and Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the national joint arthroplasty register in Switzerland and internal information from the national healthcare services in Austria and Switzerland were compared for patient demographics, interventional characteristics, and costs adjusted for inflation and purchasing power from 2015 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age for primary THA in Austria was from 67.4 to 67.8 years with 55.9-57.2 percent female patients and from 68.5 to 69.3 years with 52.4-53.8 percent female patients in Switzerland. The annual incidence rate for primary THA rose from 210.28/100k to 216.6/100k in Austria and from 212/100k to 250/100k in Switzerland. After correction for inflation, costs were -1.91 percent lower in Austria in 2021 than in 2015 and -2.57 percent lower in Switzerland. After correction for purchasing power, costs were higher in Austria. The average hospital stay after THA in Austria was reduced by 20 percent (11.7 days/2015 vs. 9.4 days/2021) and 25 percent in Switzerland (8.4 days/2015 vs. 6.4 days/2021). Revision rate was 2.5-3.2 percent in Austria and 2.8-3.2 percent in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient population was comparable while patients undergoing primary THA in Austria stay longer in hospital and have relatively higher costs when adjusted for currency, purchasing power, and inflation. The use of standardized registers would be helpful to compare outcomes and costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"e36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)是一种矫形手术,由于手术次数和每次手术的成本,给国家医疗系统带来了巨大的成本。我们在奥地利和瑞士进行了成本比较分析:我们比较了瑞士国家关节置换登记册中的数据以及奥地利和瑞士国家医疗保健服务机构的内部信息,包括患者人口统计学特征、介入治疗特征以及根据 2015 年至 2021 年通货膨胀和购买力调整后的成本:结果:在奥地利,初级THA的平均年龄为67.4至67.8岁,女性患者占55.9%至57.2%;在瑞士,初级THA的平均年龄为68.5至69.3岁,女性患者占52.4%至53.8%。在奥地利,初级THA的年发病率从210.28/100k上升到216.6/100k,在瑞士则从212/100k上升到250/100k。修正通货膨胀因素后,2021年奥地利的成本比2015年降低了-1.91%,瑞士降低了-2.57%。根据购买力进行校正后,奥地利的成本更高。奥地利THA术后平均住院时间缩短了20%(2015年为11.7天,2021年为9.4天),瑞士缩短了25%(2015年为8.4天,2021年为6.4天)。奥地利的翻修率为2.5%-3.2%,瑞士为2.8%-3.2%:患者人数相当,但在奥地利接受初级THA手术的患者住院时间更长,按货币、购买力和通货膨胀率调整后,费用相对更高。使用标准化登记册将有助于比较结果和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost and resource comparison analysis for THA in Switzerland and Austria.

Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an orthopedic intervention that generates substantial costs to national healthcare systems due to the number of interventions and the cost per intervention. We performed a cost comparison analysis in Austria and Switzerland.

Methods: Data from the national joint arthroplasty register in Switzerland and internal information from the national healthcare services in Austria and Switzerland were compared for patient demographics, interventional characteristics, and costs adjusted for inflation and purchasing power from 2015 to 2021.

Results: The average age for primary THA in Austria was from 67.4 to 67.8 years with 55.9-57.2 percent female patients and from 68.5 to 69.3 years with 52.4-53.8 percent female patients in Switzerland. The annual incidence rate for primary THA rose from 210.28/100k to 216.6/100k in Austria and from 212/100k to 250/100k in Switzerland. After correction for inflation, costs were -1.91 percent lower in Austria in 2021 than in 2015 and -2.57 percent lower in Switzerland. After correction for purchasing power, costs were higher in Austria. The average hospital stay after THA in Austria was reduced by 20 percent (11.7 days/2015 vs. 9.4 days/2021) and 25 percent in Switzerland (8.4 days/2015 vs. 6.4 days/2021). Revision rate was 2.5-3.2 percent in Austria and 2.8-3.2 percent in Switzerland.

Conclusions: The patient population was comparable while patients undergoing primary THA in Austria stay longer in hospital and have relatively higher costs when adjusted for currency, purchasing power, and inflation. The use of standardized registers would be helpful to compare outcomes and costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
A MINIMUM DATASET FOR DESTINATION THERAPY WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: THE EVIDENCE THAT MATTERS TO DECISION MAKERS. A decision-analytic method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring technology for chronic depression. Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil. Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force. How can actuarial science contribute to the field of health technology assessment? An interdisciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1