Zhong-Lin Lu, Yukai Zhao, Luis Andres Lesmes, Michael Dorr
{"title":"量化视力与对比敏感度功能之间的功能关系","authors":"Zhong-Lin Lu, Yukai Zhao, Luis Andres Lesmes, Michael Dorr","doi":"10.1167/iovs.65.12.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Studies have reported that individuals with certain ocular disorders may have significant decreases in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) despite having normal or near normal visual acuity (VA). This study seeks to elucidate this phenomenon by investigating the relationship between VA and CSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 14 eyes tested with Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy and quantitative CSF under four Bangerter foil conditions (n = 56). From the CSF data, we estimated peak gain, peak frequency, and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSA). We explored the correlations between VA and various CSF parameters and evaluated five predictive models of VA using CSA alone and in combination with additional CSF parameters through ridge regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that similar VA scores can correspond with markedly different CSFs and observed significant correlations among all CSF parameters and between VA and each CSF parameter (all P < 0.001). The most effective predictive model, incorporating CSA and peak gain, explained 90.97% of the variance with a root mean squared error of 0.0676 logMAR, which is comparable with the average standard deviation of the VA scores (0.0627 logMAR) and accounted for 38.6% of the residual variance not explained by the CSA-alone model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers the first empirical inference of the quantitative relationship between VA and CSF, suggesting that various CSF parameter combinations can yield identical VA. This might help to explain why some clinical populations with normal or near-normal VA exhibit significant CSF deficits and calls for further research in different clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"65 12","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the Functional Relationship Between Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Function.\",\"authors\":\"Zhong-Lin Lu, Yukai Zhao, Luis Andres Lesmes, Michael Dorr\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.65.12.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Studies have reported that individuals with certain ocular disorders may have significant decreases in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) despite having normal or near normal visual acuity (VA). This study seeks to elucidate this phenomenon by investigating the relationship between VA and CSF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 14 eyes tested with Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy and quantitative CSF under four Bangerter foil conditions (n = 56). From the CSF data, we estimated peak gain, peak frequency, and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSA). We explored the correlations between VA and various CSF parameters and evaluated five predictive models of VA using CSA alone and in combination with additional CSF parameters through ridge regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that similar VA scores can correspond with markedly different CSFs and observed significant correlations among all CSF parameters and between VA and each CSF parameter (all P < 0.001). The most effective predictive model, incorporating CSA and peak gain, explained 90.97% of the variance with a root mean squared error of 0.0676 logMAR, which is comparable with the average standard deviation of the VA scores (0.0627 logMAR) and accounted for 38.6% of the residual variance not explained by the CSA-alone model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers the first empirical inference of the quantitative relationship between VA and CSF, suggesting that various CSF parameter combinations can yield identical VA. This might help to explain why some clinical populations with normal or near-normal VA exhibit significant CSF deficits and calls for further research in different clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":\"65 12\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.65.12.33\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.65.12.33","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:有研究报告称,患有某些眼部疾病的人尽管视力(VA)正常或接近正常,但对比敏感度功能(CSF)可能会显著下降。本研究试图通过调查 VA 与 CSF 之间的关系来阐明这一现象:我们分析了 14 只接受电子早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变测试的眼睛的数据,以及四种 Bangerter 箔条件下的定量 CSF(n = 56)。根据 CSF 数据,我们估算了峰值增益、峰值频率和对比敏感度(CSA)。我们探讨了 VA 与 CSF 各项参数之间的相关性,并通过脊回归法单独使用 CSA 和结合 CSF 其他参数评估了 VA 的五个预测模型:我们发现,相似的 VA 分数可能对应着明显不同的 CSF,并观察到所有 CSF 参数之间以及 VA 和每个 CSF 参数之间存在显著相关性(所有 P <0.001)。最有效的预测模型结合了 CSA 和峰值增益,解释了 90.97% 的方差,均方根误差为 0.0676 logMAR,与 VA 评分的平均标准偏差(0.0627 logMAR)相当,并占单独 CSA 模型无法解释的残差的 38.6%:本研究首次对 VA 与 CSF 之间的定量关系进行了实证推断,表明不同的 CSF 参数组合可产生相同的 VA。这可能有助于解释为什么一些VA正常或接近正常的临床人群会表现出明显的CSF缺陷,因此需要在不同的临床环境中开展进一步的研究。
Quantifying the Functional Relationship Between Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Function.
Purpose: Studies have reported that individuals with certain ocular disorders may have significant decreases in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) despite having normal or near normal visual acuity (VA). This study seeks to elucidate this phenomenon by investigating the relationship between VA and CSF.
Methods: We analyzed data from 14 eyes tested with Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy and quantitative CSF under four Bangerter foil conditions (n = 56). From the CSF data, we estimated peak gain, peak frequency, and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSA). We explored the correlations between VA and various CSF parameters and evaluated five predictive models of VA using CSA alone and in combination with additional CSF parameters through ridge regression.
Results: We found that similar VA scores can correspond with markedly different CSFs and observed significant correlations among all CSF parameters and between VA and each CSF parameter (all P < 0.001). The most effective predictive model, incorporating CSA and peak gain, explained 90.97% of the variance with a root mean squared error of 0.0676 logMAR, which is comparable with the average standard deviation of the VA scores (0.0627 logMAR) and accounted for 38.6% of the residual variance not explained by the CSA-alone model.
Conclusions: This study offers the first empirical inference of the quantitative relationship between VA and CSF, suggesting that various CSF parameter combinations can yield identical VA. This might help to explain why some clinical populations with normal or near-normal VA exhibit significant CSF deficits and calls for further research in different clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.