接受显微睾丸取精术(micro-TESE)的非梗阻性无精子症患者的妊娠结局:新鲜睾丸精子与冷冻解冻睾丸精子的比较。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7
Lala Suleymanova, Hale Bayram, Yaprak Dönmez Çakıl, Belgin Selam, Mehmet Cincik
{"title":"接受显微睾丸取精术(micro-TESE)的非梗阻性无精子症患者的妊娠结局:新鲜睾丸精子与冷冻解冻睾丸精子的比较。","authors":"Lala Suleymanova, Hale Bayram, Yaprak Dönmez Çakıl, Belgin Selam, Mehmet Cincik","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative merits of fresh or frozen testicular sperm in ICSI remain a matter of contention. This study aims to compare the reproductive outcomes of non-obstructive azoospermia patients undergoing ICSI using fresh and frozen-thawed microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) sperm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 223 men with non-obstructive azoospermia underwent micro-TESE to collect testicular spermatozoa. ICSI cycles were performed using fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa. The cleavage states and grading of embryos, fertilization, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups to assess the impact of cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa on embryo quality and ICSI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 223 cases were evaluated, with fertilization observed in 208 cases and no fertilization observed in 15 cases. The number of day 3 total embryos and the number of cleavage embryos differed between the fresh and frozen micro-TESE groups, whereas the number of two-pronuclei oocytes, grading of embryos, fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth rates were found to be similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cryopreservation of spermatozoa obtained by micro-TESE does not affect the fertilization rate or pregnancy outcome in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. The present findings, when considered in conjunction with the extant evidence, may serve to alleviate concerns regarding the utilization of frozen-thawed micro-TESE sperm in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing micro-TESE: comparison of fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm.\",\"authors\":\"Lala Suleymanova, Hale Bayram, Yaprak Dönmez Çakıl, Belgin Selam, Mehmet Cincik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative merits of fresh or frozen testicular sperm in ICSI remain a matter of contention. This study aims to compare the reproductive outcomes of non-obstructive azoospermia patients undergoing ICSI using fresh and frozen-thawed microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) sperm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 223 men with non-obstructive azoospermia underwent micro-TESE to collect testicular spermatozoa. ICSI cycles were performed using fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa. The cleavage states and grading of embryos, fertilization, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups to assess the impact of cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa on embryo quality and ICSI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 223 cases were evaluated, with fertilization observed in 208 cases and no fertilization observed in 15 cases. The number of day 3 total embryos and the number of cleavage embryos differed between the fresh and frozen micro-TESE groups, whereas the number of two-pronuclei oocytes, grading of embryos, fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth rates were found to be similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cryopreservation of spermatozoa obtained by micro-TESE does not affect the fertilization rate or pregnancy outcome in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. The present findings, when considered in conjunction with the extant evidence, may serve to alleviate concerns regarding the utilization of frozen-thawed micro-TESE sperm in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)中,新鲜或冷冻睾丸精子的相对优劣仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较非梗阻性无精子症患者使用新鲜和冰冻的显微解剖睾丸取精术(micro-TESE)精子进行卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)的生殖结果:共有223名非梗阻性无精子症男性接受了显微TESE,以收集睾丸精子。使用新鲜精子和冷冻解冻精子进行卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)周期。比较两组胚胎的分裂状态和分级、受精和妊娠结果,以评估冷冻保存睾丸精子对胚胎质量和 ICSI 结果的影响:共评估了 223 个病例,其中 208 例观察到受精,15 例未观察到受精。新鲜组和冷冻 micro-TESE 组第 3 天总胚胎数和裂解胚胎数不同,而两组的双前核卵母细胞数、胚胎分级、受精率、妊娠率和活产率相似:结论:在非梗阻性无精子症病例中,通过显微 TESE 获得的精子冷冻保存不会影响受精率或妊娠结果。将本研究结果与现有证据结合起来考虑,可以减轻非梗阻性无精子症患者对使用冷冻解冻的显微TESE精子的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing micro-TESE: comparison of fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm.

Background: The relative merits of fresh or frozen testicular sperm in ICSI remain a matter of contention. This study aims to compare the reproductive outcomes of non-obstructive azoospermia patients undergoing ICSI using fresh and frozen-thawed microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) sperm.

Methods: A total of 223 men with non-obstructive azoospermia underwent micro-TESE to collect testicular spermatozoa. ICSI cycles were performed using fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa. The cleavage states and grading of embryos, fertilization, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups to assess the impact of cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa on embryo quality and ICSI outcomes.

Results: A total of 223 cases were evaluated, with fertilization observed in 208 cases and no fertilization observed in 15 cases. The number of day 3 total embryos and the number of cleavage embryos differed between the fresh and frozen micro-TESE groups, whereas the number of two-pronuclei oocytes, grading of embryos, fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth rates were found to be similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: The cryopreservation of spermatozoa obtained by micro-TESE does not affect the fertilization rate or pregnancy outcome in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. The present findings, when considered in conjunction with the extant evidence, may serve to alleviate concerns regarding the utilization of frozen-thawed micro-TESE sperm in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Delays in the final stages of fertilization are strongly associated with trichotomous cytokinesis and cleavage arrest. The impact of Duostim protocol on pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients: A meta-analysis comparing single and double conventional stimulation cycles. Effect of zinc on sperm recovered by swim-up. The nexus between gamete donation and cryobiology in ARTs: Avoiding the unavoidable. Phenotypic impact of CFTR mutations on male reproductive tract agenesis in a Chinese cohort with congenital absence of the vas deferens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1