利用潜谱分析对脓毒性休克进行临床表型:一项多中心回顾性研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154932
Guanghao Liu , Ruoqiong Wu , Jun He , Yichang Xu , Li Han , Yingying Yu , Haibo Zhu , Yehan Guo , Hao Fu , Ting Chen , Shixiang Zheng , Xiaopei Shen
{"title":"利用潜谱分析对脓毒性休克进行临床表型:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Guanghao Liu ,&nbsp;Ruoqiong Wu ,&nbsp;Jun He ,&nbsp;Yichang Xu ,&nbsp;Li Han ,&nbsp;Yingying Yu ,&nbsp;Haibo Zhu ,&nbsp;Yehan Guo ,&nbsp;Hao Fu ,&nbsp;Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Shixiang Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaopei Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Septic shock (SS) is a highly fatal and heterogeneous syndrome. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes provides valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may help to propose precise clinical management strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Latent profile analysis (LPA), a model-based unsupervised method, was used for phenotyping in the MIMIC cohort, and the model was externally independently validated in the eICU and AUMC cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three phenotypes, labeled phenotype I, II, and III, were derived. These phenotypes varied in demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, patterns of organ dysfunction, organ support, and prognosis. Phenotype I, characterized by the most severe organ dysfunction (especially liver), the youngest age, and the highest BMI, had the highest mortality (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Phenotype II, with moderate mortality, was characterized by severe renal injury. In contrast, phenotype III, associated with the oldest age and the fewest comorbidities, exhibited significantly lower mortality. Phenotype I patients had the steepest survival curves and demonstrated an ultra-high risk of death, particularly within the first few days after SS onset.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The individualized identification of phenotypes is well suited to clinical practice. The three SS phenotypes differed significantly in pathophysiological and clinical outcomes, which are crucial for informing management decisions and prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 154932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical phenotyping of septic shock with latent profile analysis: A retrospective multicenter study\",\"authors\":\"Guanghao Liu ,&nbsp;Ruoqiong Wu ,&nbsp;Jun He ,&nbsp;Yichang Xu ,&nbsp;Li Han ,&nbsp;Yingying Yu ,&nbsp;Haibo Zhu ,&nbsp;Yehan Guo ,&nbsp;Hao Fu ,&nbsp;Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Shixiang Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaopei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Septic shock (SS) is a highly fatal and heterogeneous syndrome. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes provides valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may help to propose precise clinical management strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Latent profile analysis (LPA), a model-based unsupervised method, was used for phenotyping in the MIMIC cohort, and the model was externally independently validated in the eICU and AUMC cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three phenotypes, labeled phenotype I, II, and III, were derived. These phenotypes varied in demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, patterns of organ dysfunction, organ support, and prognosis. Phenotype I, characterized by the most severe organ dysfunction (especially liver), the youngest age, and the highest BMI, had the highest mortality (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Phenotype II, with moderate mortality, was characterized by severe renal injury. In contrast, phenotype III, associated with the oldest age and the fewest comorbidities, exhibited significantly lower mortality. Phenotype I patients had the steepest survival curves and demonstrated an ultra-high risk of death, particularly within the first few days after SS onset.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The individualized identification of phenotypes is well suited to clinical practice. The three SS phenotypes differed significantly in pathophysiological and clinical outcomes, which are crucial for informing management decisions and prognosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 154932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124004192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124004192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒性休克(SS)是一种高度致命的异质性综合征。识别不同的临床表型有助于深入了解潜在的病理生理机制,并有助于提出精确的临床管理策略:方法:在 MIMIC 队列中使用基于模型的无监督方法 Latent profile analysis (LPA) 进行表型分析,并在 eICU 和 AUMC 队列中对该模型进行了外部独立验证:结果:得出了三种表型,分别称为表型 I、II 和 III。这些表型在人口统计学、临床特征、合并症、器官功能障碍模式、器官支持和预后方面各不相同。表型 I 以最严重的器官功能障碍(尤其是肝脏)、最年轻的年龄和最高的体重指数为特征,死亡率最高(P 结论):表型的个体化鉴定非常适合临床实践。SS 的三种表型在病理生理学和临床结果方面存在显著差异,这对于制定管理决策和预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical phenotyping of septic shock with latent profile analysis: A retrospective multicenter study

Background

Septic shock (SS) is a highly fatal and heterogeneous syndrome. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes provides valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may help to propose precise clinical management strategies.

Methods

Latent profile analysis (LPA), a model-based unsupervised method, was used for phenotyping in the MIMIC cohort, and the model was externally independently validated in the eICU and AUMC cohorts.

Results

Three phenotypes, labeled phenotype I, II, and III, were derived. These phenotypes varied in demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, patterns of organ dysfunction, organ support, and prognosis. Phenotype I, characterized by the most severe organ dysfunction (especially liver), the youngest age, and the highest BMI, had the highest mortality (p < 0.001). Phenotype II, with moderate mortality, was characterized by severe renal injury. In contrast, phenotype III, associated with the oldest age and the fewest comorbidities, exhibited significantly lower mortality. Phenotype I patients had the steepest survival curves and demonstrated an ultra-high risk of death, particularly within the first few days after SS onset.

Conclusions

The individualized identification of phenotypes is well suited to clinical practice. The three SS phenotypes differed significantly in pathophysiological and clinical outcomes, which are crucial for informing management decisions and prognosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
What every intensivist should know about ciprofol Emergency critical care - life-saving critical care before ICU admission: A consensus statement of a Group of European Experts Electrical impedance tomography to set high pressure in time-controlled adaptive ventilation Editorial Board Target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients and its association with 28-day mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1