Guanghao Liu , Ruoqiong Wu , Jun He , Yichang Xu , Li Han , Yingying Yu , Haibo Zhu , Yehan Guo , Hao Fu , Ting Chen , Shixiang Zheng , Xiaopei Shen
{"title":"利用潜谱分析对脓毒性休克进行临床表型:一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Guanghao Liu , Ruoqiong Wu , Jun He , Yichang Xu , Li Han , Yingying Yu , Haibo Zhu , Yehan Guo , Hao Fu , Ting Chen , Shixiang Zheng , Xiaopei Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Septic shock (SS) is a highly fatal and heterogeneous syndrome. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes provides valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may help to propose precise clinical management strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Latent profile analysis (LPA), a model-based unsupervised method, was used for phenotyping in the MIMIC cohort, and the model was externally independently validated in the eICU and AUMC cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three phenotypes, labeled phenotype I, II, and III, were derived. These phenotypes varied in demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, patterns of organ dysfunction, organ support, and prognosis. Phenotype I, characterized by the most severe organ dysfunction (especially liver), the youngest age, and the highest BMI, had the highest mortality (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Phenotype II, with moderate mortality, was characterized by severe renal injury. In contrast, phenotype III, associated with the oldest age and the fewest comorbidities, exhibited significantly lower mortality. Phenotype I patients had the steepest survival curves and demonstrated an ultra-high risk of death, particularly within the first few days after SS onset.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The individualized identification of phenotypes is well suited to clinical practice. The three SS phenotypes differed significantly in pathophysiological and clinical outcomes, which are crucial for informing management decisions and prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 154932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical phenotyping of septic shock with latent profile analysis: A retrospective multicenter study\",\"authors\":\"Guanghao Liu , Ruoqiong Wu , Jun He , Yichang Xu , Li Han , Yingying Yu , Haibo Zhu , Yehan Guo , Hao Fu , Ting Chen , Shixiang Zheng , Xiaopei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Septic shock (SS) is a highly fatal and heterogeneous syndrome. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes provides valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may help to propose precise clinical management strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Latent profile analysis (LPA), a model-based unsupervised method, was used for phenotyping in the MIMIC cohort, and the model was externally independently validated in the eICU and AUMC cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three phenotypes, labeled phenotype I, II, and III, were derived. These phenotypes varied in demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, patterns of organ dysfunction, organ support, and prognosis. Phenotype I, characterized by the most severe organ dysfunction (especially liver), the youngest age, and the highest BMI, had the highest mortality (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Phenotype II, with moderate mortality, was characterized by severe renal injury. In contrast, phenotype III, associated with the oldest age and the fewest comorbidities, exhibited significantly lower mortality. Phenotype I patients had the steepest survival curves and demonstrated an ultra-high risk of death, particularly within the first few days after SS onset.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The individualized identification of phenotypes is well suited to clinical practice. The three SS phenotypes differed significantly in pathophysiological and clinical outcomes, which are crucial for informing management decisions and prognosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 154932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124004192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124004192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical phenotyping of septic shock with latent profile analysis: A retrospective multicenter study
Background
Septic shock (SS) is a highly fatal and heterogeneous syndrome. Identifying distinct clinical phenotypes provides valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and may help to propose precise clinical management strategies.
Methods
Latent profile analysis (LPA), a model-based unsupervised method, was used for phenotyping in the MIMIC cohort, and the model was externally independently validated in the eICU and AUMC cohorts.
Results
Three phenotypes, labeled phenotype I, II, and III, were derived. These phenotypes varied in demographics, clinical features, comorbidities, patterns of organ dysfunction, organ support, and prognosis. Phenotype I, characterized by the most severe organ dysfunction (especially liver), the youngest age, and the highest BMI, had the highest mortality (p < 0.001). Phenotype II, with moderate mortality, was characterized by severe renal injury. In contrast, phenotype III, associated with the oldest age and the fewest comorbidities, exhibited significantly lower mortality. Phenotype I patients had the steepest survival curves and demonstrated an ultra-high risk of death, particularly within the first few days after SS onset.
Conclusions
The individualized identification of phenotypes is well suited to clinical practice. The three SS phenotypes differed significantly in pathophysiological and clinical outcomes, which are crucial for informing management decisions and prognosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.