Jacques G Rivière, Gerard Carot-Sans, Jordi Piera-Jiménez, Sergi de la Torre, Xavier Cos, Xavier Serra-Picamal, Pere Soler-Palacin
{"title":"开发以专家为基础的评分系统,用于早期识别基层医疗机构中的先天性免疫错误患者--PIDCAP 项目。","authors":"Jacques G Rivière, Gerard Carot-Sans, Jordi Piera-Jiménez, Sergi de la Torre, Xavier Cos, Xavier Serra-Picamal, Pere Soler-Palacin","doi":"10.1007/s10875-024-01825-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) has been shown to reduce mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. The need for early diagnosis has led to the development of computational tools that trigger earlier clinical suspicion by physicians. Primary care professionals serve as the first line for improving early diagnosis. To this end, a computer-based tool (based on extended Jeffrey Modell Foundation (JMF) Warning Signs) was developed to assist physicians with diagnosis decisions for IEIs in the primary care setting. Two expert-guided scoring systems (one pediatric, one adult) were developed. IEI warning signs were identified and a panel of 36 experts reached a consensus on which signs to include and how they should be weighted. The resulting scoring system was tested against a retrospective registry of patients with confirmed IEI using primary care EHRs. A pilot study to assess the feasibility of implementation in primary care was conducted. The scoring system includes 27 warning signs for pediatric patients and 24 for adults, adding additional clinically relevant criteria established by expert consensus to the JMF Warning Signs. Cytopenias, ≥ 2 systemic infections, recurrent fever and bronchiectasis were the leading warning signs in children, as bronchiectasis, autoimmune diseases, cytopenias, and > 3 pneumonias were in adults. The PIDCAP (Primary Immune Deficiency \"Centre d'Atenció Primària\" that stands for Primary Care Center in Catalan) tool was implemented in the primary care workstation in a pilot area. The expert-based approach has the potential to lessen under-reporting and minimize diagnostic delays of IEIs. It can be seamlessly integrated into clinical primary care workstations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an Expert-Based Scoring System for Early Identification of Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity in Primary Care Settings - the PIDCAP Project.\",\"authors\":\"Jacques G Rivière, Gerard Carot-Sans, Jordi Piera-Jiménez, Sergi de la Torre, Xavier Cos, Xavier Serra-Picamal, Pere Soler-Palacin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10875-024-01825-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) has been shown to reduce mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. The need for early diagnosis has led to the development of computational tools that trigger earlier clinical suspicion by physicians. Primary care professionals serve as the first line for improving early diagnosis. To this end, a computer-based tool (based on extended Jeffrey Modell Foundation (JMF) Warning Signs) was developed to assist physicians with diagnosis decisions for IEIs in the primary care setting. Two expert-guided scoring systems (one pediatric, one adult) were developed. IEI warning signs were identified and a panel of 36 experts reached a consensus on which signs to include and how they should be weighted. The resulting scoring system was tested against a retrospective registry of patients with confirmed IEI using primary care EHRs. A pilot study to assess the feasibility of implementation in primary care was conducted. The scoring system includes 27 warning signs for pediatric patients and 24 for adults, adding additional clinically relevant criteria established by expert consensus to the JMF Warning Signs. Cytopenias, ≥ 2 systemic infections, recurrent fever and bronchiectasis were the leading warning signs in children, as bronchiectasis, autoimmune diseases, cytopenias, and > 3 pneumonias were in adults. The PIDCAP (Primary Immune Deficiency \\\"Centre d'Atenció Primària\\\" that stands for Primary Care Center in Catalan) tool was implemented in the primary care workstation in a pilot area. The expert-based approach has the potential to lessen under-reporting and minimize diagnostic delays of IEIs. It can be seamlessly integrated into clinical primary care workstations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-024-01825-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-024-01825-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of an Expert-Based Scoring System for Early Identification of Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity in Primary Care Settings - the PIDCAP Project.
Early diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) has been shown to reduce mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. The need for early diagnosis has led to the development of computational tools that trigger earlier clinical suspicion by physicians. Primary care professionals serve as the first line for improving early diagnosis. To this end, a computer-based tool (based on extended Jeffrey Modell Foundation (JMF) Warning Signs) was developed to assist physicians with diagnosis decisions for IEIs in the primary care setting. Two expert-guided scoring systems (one pediatric, one adult) were developed. IEI warning signs were identified and a panel of 36 experts reached a consensus on which signs to include and how they should be weighted. The resulting scoring system was tested against a retrospective registry of patients with confirmed IEI using primary care EHRs. A pilot study to assess the feasibility of implementation in primary care was conducted. The scoring system includes 27 warning signs for pediatric patients and 24 for adults, adding additional clinically relevant criteria established by expert consensus to the JMF Warning Signs. Cytopenias, ≥ 2 systemic infections, recurrent fever and bronchiectasis were the leading warning signs in children, as bronchiectasis, autoimmune diseases, cytopenias, and > 3 pneumonias were in adults. The PIDCAP (Primary Immune Deficiency "Centre d'Atenció Primària" that stands for Primary Care Center in Catalan) tool was implemented in the primary care workstation in a pilot area. The expert-based approach has the potential to lessen under-reporting and minimize diagnostic delays of IEIs. It can be seamlessly integrated into clinical primary care workstations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Immunology publishes impactful papers in the realm of human immunology, delving into the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, or treatment of human diseases. The journal places particular emphasis on primary immunodeficiencies and related diseases, encompassing inborn errors of immunity in a broad sense, their underlying genotypes, and diverse phenotypes. These phenotypes include infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-inflammation, and autoimmunity. We welcome a broad spectrum of studies in this domain, spanning genetic discovery, clinical description, immunologic assessment, diagnostic approaches, prognosis evaluation, and treatment interventions. Case reports are considered if they are genuinely original and accompanied by a concise review of the relevant medical literature, illustrating how the novel case study advances the field. The instructions to authors provide detailed guidance on the four categories of papers accepted by the journal.