基于人工智能的脑转移瘤检测和分割模块的早期经验。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8
Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Dheerendra Prasad
{"title":"基于人工智能的脑转移瘤检测和分割模块的早期经验。","authors":"Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Dheerendra Prasad","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>- Accurate detection, segmentation, and volumetric analysis of brain lesions are essential in neuro-oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have improved the efficiency of these processes. This study evaluated an AI-based module for detecting and segmenting brain metastases, comparing it with manual detection and segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>- MRIs from 51 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases were analyzed. Manual lesion identification and contouring on Leksell Gamma Plan at the time of treatment served as the gold standard. The same MRIs were processed through an AI-based module (Brainlab Smart Brush), and lesion detection and volumes were compared. Discrepancies were analyzed to identify possible sources of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>- Among 51 patients, 359 brain metastases were identified. The AI module achieved a sensitivity of 79.2% and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, compared to a 93.3% sensitivity for manual detection. However, for lesions > 0.1 cc, the AI's sensitivity rose to 97.5%, surpassing manual detection at 93%. Volumetric agreement between AI and manual segmentations was high (Spearman's ρ = 0.997, p < 0.001). Most lesions missed by the AI (53.8%) were near anatomical structures that complicated detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>- The AI module demonstrated higher sensitivity than manual detection for metastases larger than 0.1 cc, with robust volumetric accuracy. However, human expertise remains critical for detecting smaller lesions, especially near complex anatomical areas. AI offers significant potential to enhance neuro-oncology practice by improving the efficiency and accuracy of lesion management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early experience with an artificial intelligence-based module for brain metastasis detection and segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Dheerendra Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>- Accurate detection, segmentation, and volumetric analysis of brain lesions are essential in neuro-oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have improved the efficiency of these processes. This study evaluated an AI-based module for detecting and segmenting brain metastases, comparing it with manual detection and segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>- MRIs from 51 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases were analyzed. Manual lesion identification and contouring on Leksell Gamma Plan at the time of treatment served as the gold standard. The same MRIs were processed through an AI-based module (Brainlab Smart Brush), and lesion detection and volumes were compared. Discrepancies were analyzed to identify possible sources of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>- Among 51 patients, 359 brain metastases were identified. The AI module achieved a sensitivity of 79.2% and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, compared to a 93.3% sensitivity for manual detection. However, for lesions > 0.1 cc, the AI's sensitivity rose to 97.5%, surpassing manual detection at 93%. Volumetric agreement between AI and manual segmentations was high (Spearman's ρ = 0.997, p < 0.001). Most lesions missed by the AI (53.8%) were near anatomical structures that complicated detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>- The AI module demonstrated higher sensitivity than manual detection for metastases larger than 0.1 cc, with robust volumetric accuracy. However, human expertise remains critical for detecting smaller lesions, especially near complex anatomical areas. AI offers significant potential to enhance neuro-oncology practice by improving the efficiency and accuracy of lesion management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:- 脑部病变的精确检测、分割和容积分析在神经肿瘤学中至关重要。基于人工智能(AI)的模型提高了这些过程的效率。本研究评估了基于人工智能的脑转移瘤检测和分割模块,并将其与人工检测和分割进行了比较。治疗时在 Leksell Gamma Plan 上手动识别病灶并绘制轮廓作为金标准。同样的磁共振成像通过基于人工智能的模块(Brainlab Smart Brush)进行处理,并对病灶检测和体积进行比较。对差异进行分析,以确定可能的误差来源:- 在 51 名患者中,共发现了 359 个脑转移灶。人工智能模块的灵敏度为 79.2%,阳性预测值为 95.6%,而人工检测的灵敏度为 93.3%。然而,对于大于 0.1 毫升的病灶,人工智能的灵敏度上升到 97.5%,超过了人工检测的 93%。人工智能和手动分割之间的容积一致性很高(Spearman's ρ = 0.997,p 结论:人工智能和手动分割之间的容积一致性很高(Spearman's ρ = 0.997,p 结论):- 对于大于 0.1 毫升的转移瘤,人工智能模块的灵敏度高于人工检测,且具有很高的体积准确性。然而,对于检测较小的病灶,尤其是复杂解剖区域附近的病灶,人类的专业知识仍然至关重要。通过提高病灶管理的效率和准确性,人工智能在加强神经肿瘤学实践方面具有巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early experience with an artificial intelligence-based module for brain metastasis detection and segmentation.

Introduction: - Accurate detection, segmentation, and volumetric analysis of brain lesions are essential in neuro-oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have improved the efficiency of these processes. This study evaluated an AI-based module for detecting and segmenting brain metastases, comparing it with manual detection and segmentation.

Methods: - MRIs from 51 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases were analyzed. Manual lesion identification and contouring on Leksell Gamma Plan at the time of treatment served as the gold standard. The same MRIs were processed through an AI-based module (Brainlab Smart Brush), and lesion detection and volumes were compared. Discrepancies were analyzed to identify possible sources of error.

Results: - Among 51 patients, 359 brain metastases were identified. The AI module achieved a sensitivity of 79.2% and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, compared to a 93.3% sensitivity for manual detection. However, for lesions > 0.1 cc, the AI's sensitivity rose to 97.5%, surpassing manual detection at 93%. Volumetric agreement between AI and manual segmentations was high (Spearman's ρ = 0.997, p < 0.001). Most lesions missed by the AI (53.8%) were near anatomical structures that complicated detection.

Conclusions: - The AI module demonstrated higher sensitivity than manual detection for metastases larger than 0.1 cc, with robust volumetric accuracy. However, human expertise remains critical for detecting smaller lesions, especially near complex anatomical areas. AI offers significant potential to enhance neuro-oncology practice by improving the efficiency and accuracy of lesion management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
期刊最新文献
Higher isoform of hnRNPA1 confer Temozolomide resistance in U87MG & LN229 glioma cells. The LITT Fit in neuro-oncology: indications, imaging, and adjunctive therapies. Patient-derived glioma organoids real time identification of IDH mutation, 1p/19q-codeletion and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion with differential ion mobility spectrometry. Early versus late construct failure in spine metastatic disease: implications for surgical strategy and oncologic outcome. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: emerging science, clinical advances, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1