{"title":"基于人工智能的脑转移瘤检测和分割模块的早期经验。","authors":"Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Dheerendra Prasad","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>- Accurate detection, segmentation, and volumetric analysis of brain lesions are essential in neuro-oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have improved the efficiency of these processes. This study evaluated an AI-based module for detecting and segmenting brain metastases, comparing it with manual detection and segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>- MRIs from 51 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases were analyzed. Manual lesion identification and contouring on Leksell Gamma Plan at the time of treatment served as the gold standard. The same MRIs were processed through an AI-based module (Brainlab Smart Brush), and lesion detection and volumes were compared. Discrepancies were analyzed to identify possible sources of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>- Among 51 patients, 359 brain metastases were identified. The AI module achieved a sensitivity of 79.2% and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, compared to a 93.3% sensitivity for manual detection. However, for lesions > 0.1 cc, the AI's sensitivity rose to 97.5%, surpassing manual detection at 93%. Volumetric agreement between AI and manual segmentations was high (Spearman's ρ = 0.997, p < 0.001). Most lesions missed by the AI (53.8%) were near anatomical structures that complicated detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>- The AI module demonstrated higher sensitivity than manual detection for metastases larger than 0.1 cc, with robust volumetric accuracy. However, human expertise remains critical for detecting smaller lesions, especially near complex anatomical areas. AI offers significant potential to enhance neuro-oncology practice by improving the efficiency and accuracy of lesion management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early experience with an artificial intelligence-based module for brain metastasis detection and segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Venkatesh S Madhugiri, Dheerendra Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>- Accurate detection, segmentation, and volumetric analysis of brain lesions are essential in neuro-oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have improved the efficiency of these processes. This study evaluated an AI-based module for detecting and segmenting brain metastases, comparing it with manual detection and segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>- MRIs from 51 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases were analyzed. Manual lesion identification and contouring on Leksell Gamma Plan at the time of treatment served as the gold standard. The same MRIs were processed through an AI-based module (Brainlab Smart Brush), and lesion detection and volumes were compared. Discrepancies were analyzed to identify possible sources of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>- Among 51 patients, 359 brain metastases were identified. The AI module achieved a sensitivity of 79.2% and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, compared to a 93.3% sensitivity for manual detection. However, for lesions > 0.1 cc, the AI's sensitivity rose to 97.5%, surpassing manual detection at 93%. Volumetric agreement between AI and manual segmentations was high (Spearman's ρ = 0.997, p < 0.001). Most lesions missed by the AI (53.8%) were near anatomical structures that complicated detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>- The AI module demonstrated higher sensitivity than manual detection for metastases larger than 0.1 cc, with robust volumetric accuracy. However, human expertise remains critical for detecting smaller lesions, especially near complex anatomical areas. AI offers significant potential to enhance neuro-oncology practice by improving the efficiency and accuracy of lesion management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04851-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Early experience with an artificial intelligence-based module for brain metastasis detection and segmentation.
Introduction: - Accurate detection, segmentation, and volumetric analysis of brain lesions are essential in neuro-oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models have improved the efficiency of these processes. This study evaluated an AI-based module for detecting and segmenting brain metastases, comparing it with manual detection and segmentation.
Methods: - MRIs from 51 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases were analyzed. Manual lesion identification and contouring on Leksell Gamma Plan at the time of treatment served as the gold standard. The same MRIs were processed through an AI-based module (Brainlab Smart Brush), and lesion detection and volumes were compared. Discrepancies were analyzed to identify possible sources of error.
Results: - Among 51 patients, 359 brain metastases were identified. The AI module achieved a sensitivity of 79.2% and a positive predictive value of 95.6%, compared to a 93.3% sensitivity for manual detection. However, for lesions > 0.1 cc, the AI's sensitivity rose to 97.5%, surpassing manual detection at 93%. Volumetric agreement between AI and manual segmentations was high (Spearman's ρ = 0.997, p < 0.001). Most lesions missed by the AI (53.8%) were near anatomical structures that complicated detection.
Conclusions: - The AI module demonstrated higher sensitivity than manual detection for metastases larger than 0.1 cc, with robust volumetric accuracy. However, human expertise remains critical for detecting smaller lesions, especially near complex anatomical areas. AI offers significant potential to enhance neuro-oncology practice by improving the efficiency and accuracy of lesion management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.