Danielle Terrell, Joseph Camarano, Stephen Whipple, Bharat Guthikonda, Robbie Beyl, W Christopher Newman
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤患者的经济毒性。","authors":"Danielle Terrell, Joseph Camarano, Stephen Whipple, Bharat Guthikonda, Robbie Beyl, W Christopher Newman","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04835-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been mounting interest in understanding the impact of financial toxicity (FT) in various cancer types; however, it remains poorly understood and understudied within neuro-oncology-especially as it relates to neurosurgical components of patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study of patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of glioblastoma from 2020 to 2022. OIBEE™ (Austin, Texas) software was queried to identify the subset of these patients who had a bad debt charged to their account. These patients were deemed to qualify as experiencing FT. Chi Square analysis was conducted between FT and non-FT patient groups. Additionally, survival analyses were performed to determine predictors of progression free and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 patients were included in this sample. 33/74 (44%) met criteria for FT. The average bad debt amount was $7,476.76 and the median debt amount was $2,015.96, with the average time to financial toxicity after surgery being approximately 127 days. FT patients were significantly younger at diagnosis than those who were not FT (64.6 years- non-FT vs. 59.0 years- FT, p = 0.0344). FT patients were more likely to have undergone subtotal resections rather than a gross total resection compared to non-FT patients (FT GTR 27.3%, non-FT GTR 52.4%, p = 0.028). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for FT patients compared to non-FT patients (LOS FT 9.5 days, non-FT 6.5 days, p = 0.0312).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Glioblastoma patients are at high risk of experiencing FT with our series showing no significant impact on overall survival. Larger studies are needed to understand the impact of FT on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial toxicity in patients with glioblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Terrell, Joseph Camarano, Stephen Whipple, Bharat Guthikonda, Robbie Beyl, W Christopher Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04835-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been mounting interest in understanding the impact of financial toxicity (FT) in various cancer types; however, it remains poorly understood and understudied within neuro-oncology-especially as it relates to neurosurgical components of patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study of patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of glioblastoma from 2020 to 2022. OIBEE™ (Austin, Texas) software was queried to identify the subset of these patients who had a bad debt charged to their account. These patients were deemed to qualify as experiencing FT. Chi Square analysis was conducted between FT and non-FT patient groups. Additionally, survival analyses were performed to determine predictors of progression free and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 patients were included in this sample. 33/74 (44%) met criteria for FT. The average bad debt amount was $7,476.76 and the median debt amount was $2,015.96, with the average time to financial toxicity after surgery being approximately 127 days. FT patients were significantly younger at diagnosis than those who were not FT (64.6 years- non-FT vs. 59.0 years- FT, p = 0.0344). FT patients were more likely to have undergone subtotal resections rather than a gross total resection compared to non-FT patients (FT GTR 27.3%, non-FT GTR 52.4%, p = 0.028). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for FT patients compared to non-FT patients (LOS FT 9.5 days, non-FT 6.5 days, p = 0.0312).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Glioblastoma patients are at high risk of experiencing FT with our series showing no significant impact on overall survival. Larger studies are needed to understand the impact of FT on patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04835-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04835-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:人们越来越关注了解财务毒性(FT)对各种癌症类型的影响;然而,在神经肿瘤学领域,人们对财务毒性的了解和研究仍然很少,尤其是与患者护理的神经外科部分有关的财务毒性:对 2020 年至 2022 年期间接受开颅手术切除胶质母细胞瘤的患者进行回顾性单中心研究。通过查询 OIBEE™(德克萨斯州奥斯汀)软件,确定这些患者中哪些人的账户被记入坏账。这些患者被认定为 FT 患者。在 FT 和非 FT 患者组之间进行了 Chi Square 分析。此外,还进行了生存分析,以确定无进展生存期和总生存期的预测因素:74名患者被纳入该样本。33/74(44%)的患者符合 FT 标准。平均坏账金额为 7,476.76 美元,中位数为 2,015.96 美元,术后出现财务毒性的平均时间约为 127 天。与非 FT 患者相比,FT 患者确诊时的年龄明显更小(非 FT 患者 64.6 岁,FT 患者 59.0 岁,P = 0.0344)。与非 FT 患者相比,FT 患者更有可能接受次全切除术,而不是全切除术(FT GTR 27.3%,非 FT GTR 52.4%,p = 0.028)。与非FT患者相比,FT患者的住院时间明显更长(LOS FT 9.5天,非FT 6.5天,p = 0.0312):结论:胶质母细胞瘤患者发生FT的风险很高,但我们的研究结果显示,FT对患者的总生存率没有明显影响。需要进行更大规模的研究,以了解FT对患者预后的影响。
Purpose: There has been mounting interest in understanding the impact of financial toxicity (FT) in various cancer types; however, it remains poorly understood and understudied within neuro-oncology-especially as it relates to neurosurgical components of patient care.
Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of patients who underwent craniotomy for resection of glioblastoma from 2020 to 2022. OIBEE™ (Austin, Texas) software was queried to identify the subset of these patients who had a bad debt charged to their account. These patients were deemed to qualify as experiencing FT. Chi Square analysis was conducted between FT and non-FT patient groups. Additionally, survival analyses were performed to determine predictors of progression free and overall survival.
Results: 74 patients were included in this sample. 33/74 (44%) met criteria for FT. The average bad debt amount was $7,476.76 and the median debt amount was $2,015.96, with the average time to financial toxicity after surgery being approximately 127 days. FT patients were significantly younger at diagnosis than those who were not FT (64.6 years- non-FT vs. 59.0 years- FT, p = 0.0344). FT patients were more likely to have undergone subtotal resections rather than a gross total resection compared to non-FT patients (FT GTR 27.3%, non-FT GTR 52.4%, p = 0.028). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for FT patients compared to non-FT patients (LOS FT 9.5 days, non-FT 6.5 days, p = 0.0312).
Conclusion: Glioblastoma patients are at high risk of experiencing FT with our series showing no significant impact on overall survival. Larger studies are needed to understand the impact of FT on patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.