Omar M Elabd, Aliaa M Elabd, Mona S Abd El-Azez, Mohamed M Taha, Amira H Mohammed
{"title":"慢性踝关节不稳对慢性踝关节不稳患者步态负荷策略的影响:一项比较研究。","authors":"Omar M Elabd, Aliaa M Elabd, Mona S Abd El-Azez, Mohamed M Taha, Amira H Mohammed","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01478-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral ankle sprains rank among the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries, while chronic ankle instability (CAI) is its most common cascade. In addition to the conflicting results of the previous studies and their methodological flaws, the specific gait loading strategy is still not well studied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the fluctuations in gait loading strategy in people with chronic ankle instability compared to health control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 56 male subjects participated in this study and were allocated into two groups: (A) CAI group: 28 subjects with unilateral CAI (age 24.79 ± 2.64 and BMI 26.25 ± 3.50); and (B) control group: 28 subjects without a history of ankle sprains (age 24.57 ± 1.17 and BMI 26.46 ± 2.597). Stance time, weight acceptance time, and load distribution were measured to investigate gait loading strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study findings revealed that the CAI group had a significant higher load over the lateral rearfoot. However, MANOVA indicates that there was no overall significant difference in gait loading strategy between the CAI and control groups. Furthermore, in terms of stance time, time of weight acceptance phase, load over medial foot, and load over lateral foot, CAI and healthy controls seemed to walk similarly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings revealed that individuals with CAI had the significant alteration in the lateral rearfoot loading, suggesting a potential compensatory mechanism to address instability during the weight acceptance phase. This could manifest a laterally deviated center of pressure and increased frontal plane inversion during the early stance phase. However, it is acknowledged that these alterations could be both the result and the origin of CAI. The study highlights the vulnerability of CAI during the early stance phase, emphasizing the need for gait reeducation as individuals return to walking as healthcare clinicians should focus on treatment modalities aimed at reducing rearfoot inversion in individuals with CAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of chronic ankle instability on gait loading strategy in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Omar M Elabd, Aliaa M Elabd, Mona S Abd El-Azez, Mohamed M Taha, Amira H Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12984-024-01478-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral ankle sprains rank among the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries, while chronic ankle instability (CAI) is its most common cascade. In addition to the conflicting results of the previous studies and their methodological flaws, the specific gait loading strategy is still not well studied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the fluctuations in gait loading strategy in people with chronic ankle instability compared to health control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 56 male subjects participated in this study and were allocated into two groups: (A) CAI group: 28 subjects with unilateral CAI (age 24.79 ± 2.64 and BMI 26.25 ± 3.50); and (B) control group: 28 subjects without a history of ankle sprains (age 24.57 ± 1.17 and BMI 26.46 ± 2.597). Stance time, weight acceptance time, and load distribution were measured to investigate gait loading strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study findings revealed that the CAI group had a significant higher load over the lateral rearfoot. However, MANOVA indicates that there was no overall significant difference in gait loading strategy between the CAI and control groups. Furthermore, in terms of stance time, time of weight acceptance phase, load over medial foot, and load over lateral foot, CAI and healthy controls seemed to walk similarly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings revealed that individuals with CAI had the significant alteration in the lateral rearfoot loading, suggesting a potential compensatory mechanism to address instability during the weight acceptance phase. This could manifest a laterally deviated center of pressure and increased frontal plane inversion during the early stance phase. However, it is acknowledged that these alterations could be both the result and the origin of CAI. The study highlights the vulnerability of CAI during the early stance phase, emphasizing the need for gait reeducation as individuals return to walking as healthcare clinicians should focus on treatment modalities aimed at reducing rearfoot inversion in individuals with CAI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01478-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01478-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:外侧踝关节扭伤是最常见的肌肉骨骼损伤之一,而慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)则是其最常见的并发症。目的:本研究旨在调查慢性踝关节不稳定患者与健康对照组相比步态负荷策略的波动情况:共有 56 名男性受试者参加了此次研究,并被分为两组:(A) CAI 组:28 名单侧 CAI 受试者(年龄为 24.79 ± 2.64,体重指数为 26.25 ± 3.50);(B) 对照组:28 名无踝关节扭伤史的受试者(年龄为 24.57 ± 1.17,体重指数为 26.46 ± 2.597)。通过测量站立时间、体重接受时间和负荷分布来研究步态负荷策略:研究结果表明,CAI 组后脚外侧的负荷明显较高。然而,MANOVA 分析表明,CAI 组和对照组在步态负荷策略上总体上没有显著差异。此外,就站立时间、重心接受阶段时间、内侧脚负荷和外侧脚负荷而言,CAI 组和健康对照组的行走方式似乎相似:研究结果表明,CAI 患者的后脚外侧负荷发生了显著变化,这表明在体重接受阶段可能存在一种补偿机制来解决不稳定性问题。这可能表现为在早期站立阶段压力中心侧向偏离和额面内翻增加。不过,这些改变既可能是 CAI 的结果,也可能是 CAI 的起源。该研究强调了 CAI 在早期站立阶段的脆弱性,强调了在患者恢复行走时进行步态再教育的必要性,因为医疗临床医生应将重点放在旨在减少 CAI 患者后足内翻的治疗方法上。
Impact of chronic ankle instability on gait loading strategy in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a comparative study.
Background: Lateral ankle sprains rank among the most prevalent musculoskeletal injuries, while chronic ankle instability (CAI) is its most common cascade. In addition to the conflicting results of the previous studies and their methodological flaws, the specific gait loading strategy is still not well studied.
Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the fluctuations in gait loading strategy in people with chronic ankle instability compared to health control.
Methods: A total of 56 male subjects participated in this study and were allocated into two groups: (A) CAI group: 28 subjects with unilateral CAI (age 24.79 ± 2.64 and BMI 26.25 ± 3.50); and (B) control group: 28 subjects without a history of ankle sprains (age 24.57 ± 1.17 and BMI 26.46 ± 2.597). Stance time, weight acceptance time, and load distribution were measured to investigate gait loading strategy.
Results: The study findings revealed that the CAI group had a significant higher load over the lateral rearfoot. However, MANOVA indicates that there was no overall significant difference in gait loading strategy between the CAI and control groups. Furthermore, in terms of stance time, time of weight acceptance phase, load over medial foot, and load over lateral foot, CAI and healthy controls seemed to walk similarly.
Conclusions: The findings revealed that individuals with CAI had the significant alteration in the lateral rearfoot loading, suggesting a potential compensatory mechanism to address instability during the weight acceptance phase. This could manifest a laterally deviated center of pressure and increased frontal plane inversion during the early stance phase. However, it is acknowledged that these alterations could be both the result and the origin of CAI. The study highlights the vulnerability of CAI during the early stance phase, emphasizing the need for gait reeducation as individuals return to walking as healthcare clinicians should focus on treatment modalities aimed at reducing rearfoot inversion in individuals with CAI.
期刊介绍:
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.