镰状细胞自我效能感量表在镰状细胞病成人在线匿名样本中的有效性和可靠性。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2024-0077
Julia A O'Brien, Lakeya S McGill, Christopher J Burant, Charles R Jonassaint, Ronald L Hickman
{"title":"镰状细胞自我效能感量表在镰状细胞病成人在线匿名样本中的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Julia A O'Brien, Lakeya S McGill, Christopher J Burant, Charles R Jonassaint, Ronald L Hickman","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale (SCSES) in an anonymous, online cohort of adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). <b>Methods:</b> The SCSES was completed by 60 adults with SCD. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using bivariate correlations between the SCSES and other study variables, and internal consistency reliability was evaluated through examining an alpha coefficient. <b>Results:</b> A unidimensional factor structure explained 49.6% of the variance in self-efficacy. The SCSES demonstrated convergent validity and discriminant validity with the select battery of measured concepts and sufficient internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .87). <b>Conclusions:</b> The SCSES remains a valid and reliable measure of SCD self-efficacy among adults when used in anonymous, online research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale in an Online, Anonymous Sample of Adults Living With Sickle Cell Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Julia A O'Brien, Lakeya S McGill, Christopher J Burant, Charles R Jonassaint, Ronald L Hickman\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JNM-2024-0077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale (SCSES) in an anonymous, online cohort of adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). <b>Methods:</b> The SCSES was completed by 60 adults with SCD. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using bivariate correlations between the SCSES and other study variables, and internal consistency reliability was evaluated through examining an alpha coefficient. <b>Results:</b> A unidimensional factor structure explained 49.6% of the variance in self-efficacy. The SCSES demonstrated convergent validity and discriminant validity with the select battery of measured concepts and sufficient internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .87). <b>Conclusions:</b> The SCSES remains a valid and reliable measure of SCD self-efficacy among adults when used in anonymous, online research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景与目的:本研究旨在通过匿名、在线的镰状细胞病(SCD)成人队列研究镰状细胞病自我效能量表(SCSES)的心理测量特性。方法:60 名镰状细胞病成人患者完成了 SCSES。进行了探索性因子分析。利用 SCSES 与其他研究变量之间的双变量相关性评估了收敛有效性和判别有效性,并通过检查α系数评估了内部一致性可靠性。研究结果单维因子结构解释了 49.6% 的自我效能变异。SCSES 与所选的一系列测量概念之间具有收敛效度和区分效度,并具有足够的内部一致性可靠性(克朗巴赫α = .87)。结论:在匿名在线研究中使用 SCSES 时,它仍然是成年人 SCD 自我效能感的有效可靠测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and Reliability of the Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale in an Online, Anonymous Sample of Adults Living With Sickle Cell Disease.

Background and Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Sickle Cell Self-efficacy Scale (SCSES) in an anonymous, online cohort of adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). Methods: The SCSES was completed by 60 adults with SCD. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using bivariate correlations between the SCSES and other study variables, and internal consistency reliability was evaluated through examining an alpha coefficient. Results: A unidimensional factor structure explained 49.6% of the variance in self-efficacy. The SCSES demonstrated convergent validity and discriminant validity with the select battery of measured concepts and sufficient internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .87). Conclusions: The SCSES remains a valid and reliable measure of SCD self-efficacy among adults when used in anonymous, online research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Foot Health Assessment Instrument in Pregnant Women. Instruments Important to Help Increase Diversity Equity and Inclusion. The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study. Development of the Followership Evaluation Instrument for Nurses: A Prospective Longitudinal Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1