{"title":"确定和描述门诊药物使用治疗机构的药物使用治疗模式。","authors":"Zoe Lindenfeld, Jonathan H Cantor, Ji E Chang","doi":"10.15288/jsad.24-00157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given that individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have a variety of needs beyond substance use, it is critical to examine the comprehensiveness of services offered within outpatient SUD treatment facilities, where many individuals with SUDs receive care. This study's objective is to develop clusters of services offered, and assess organizational, policy, and environmental characteristics associated with having a more comprehensive treatment model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) using data on SUD treatment facilities (n=8, 197) from the 2022 Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository, a national database of SUD treatment facilities. We applied a K-means cluster analysis on the generated components to cluster facilities by service offerings, and calculated the mean for different organizational, policy and environmental characteristics for each cluster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retained five components from the PCA which represented the availability of different services (Pharmacotherapies, Infectious Disease and Harm Reduction, Supportive and Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) Services, Psychosocial Services, and General Healthcare.) The cluster analysis resulted in five SUD service models, with the most comprehensive having the highest percentage of accredited and Medicaid-accepting facilities, and facilities that were government-operated and located in a Medicaid expansion state, and the least comprehensive having lowest percentage of accredited, licensed and Medicaid-accepting facilities, and the highest percentage of private for-profit facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that SUD treatment facilities varied in the availability of five treatment components, but more comprehensive service models had a higher percentage of facilities that were licensed, accredited, and accepting Medicaid.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and Characterizing Models of Substance Use Treatment in Outpatient Substance Use Treatment Facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Lindenfeld, Jonathan H Cantor, Ji E Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsad.24-00157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given that individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have a variety of needs beyond substance use, it is critical to examine the comprehensiveness of services offered within outpatient SUD treatment facilities, where many individuals with SUDs receive care. This study's objective is to develop clusters of services offered, and assess organizational, policy, and environmental characteristics associated with having a more comprehensive treatment model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) using data on SUD treatment facilities (n=8, 197) from the 2022 Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository, a national database of SUD treatment facilities. We applied a K-means cluster analysis on the generated components to cluster facilities by service offerings, and calculated the mean for different organizational, policy and environmental characteristics for each cluster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retained five components from the PCA which represented the availability of different services (Pharmacotherapies, Infectious Disease and Harm Reduction, Supportive and Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) Services, Psychosocial Services, and General Healthcare.) The cluster analysis resulted in five SUD service models, with the most comprehensive having the highest percentage of accredited and Medicaid-accepting facilities, and facilities that were government-operated and located in a Medicaid expansion state, and the least comprehensive having lowest percentage of accredited, licensed and Medicaid-accepting facilities, and the highest percentage of private for-profit facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that SUD treatment facilities varied in the availability of five treatment components, but more comprehensive service models had a higher percentage of facilities that were licensed, accredited, and accepting Medicaid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:鉴于药物使用失调症(SUD)患者除药物使用外还有其他各种需求,因此检查门诊药物使用失调症治疗机构(许多药物使用失调症患者接受治疗的地方)所提供服务的全面性至关重要。本研究的目的是对所提供的服务进行分组,并评估与更全面治疗模式相关的组织、政策和环境特征:我们利用 2022 年精神健康和成瘾治疗跟踪资料库(SUD 治疗机构的国家数据库)中有关 SUD 治疗机构的数据(n=8,197)进行了主成分分析(PCA)。我们对生成的成分进行了 K-means 聚类分析,按照服务项目对机构进行了聚类,并计算了每个聚类的不同组织、政策和环境特征的平均值:结果:我们保留了 PCA 中的五个组成部分,它们代表了不同服务的可用性(药物治疗、传染病和减低伤害、支持性和健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)服务、社会心理服务和一般医疗保健)。通过聚类分析,我们得出了五种药物滥用治疗服务模式,其中最全面的服务模式拥有最高比例的经过认证且可接受医疗补助的机构,以及由政府运营且位于医疗补助扩展州的机构;最不全面的服务模式拥有最低比例的经过认证、获得许可且可接受医疗补助的机构,以及最高比例的私营营利机构:我们的研究发现,药物滥用治疗机构在提供五项治疗内容方面各不相同,但服务模式更全面的机构中,获得许可、认证和接受医疗补助的机构所占比例更高。
Identifying and Characterizing Models of Substance Use Treatment in Outpatient Substance Use Treatment Facilities.
Background: Given that individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have a variety of needs beyond substance use, it is critical to examine the comprehensiveness of services offered within outpatient SUD treatment facilities, where many individuals with SUDs receive care. This study's objective is to develop clusters of services offered, and assess organizational, policy, and environmental characteristics associated with having a more comprehensive treatment model.
Methods: We conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) using data on SUD treatment facilities (n=8, 197) from the 2022 Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Tracking Repository, a national database of SUD treatment facilities. We applied a K-means cluster analysis on the generated components to cluster facilities by service offerings, and calculated the mean for different organizational, policy and environmental characteristics for each cluster.
Results: We retained five components from the PCA which represented the availability of different services (Pharmacotherapies, Infectious Disease and Harm Reduction, Supportive and Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) Services, Psychosocial Services, and General Healthcare.) The cluster analysis resulted in five SUD service models, with the most comprehensive having the highest percentage of accredited and Medicaid-accepting facilities, and facilities that were government-operated and located in a Medicaid expansion state, and the least comprehensive having lowest percentage of accredited, licensed and Medicaid-accepting facilities, and the highest percentage of private for-profit facilities.
Conclusions: Our study found that SUD treatment facilities varied in the availability of five treatment components, but more comprehensive service models had a higher percentage of facilities that were licensed, accredited, and accepting Medicaid.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.