个人参与者数据元分析:亲职教育计划对破坏性行为影响的中介因素的个体差异。

Liina Björg Laas Sigurðardóttir, G J Melendez-Torres, Sophia Backhaus, Frances Gardner, Stephen Scott, Patty Leijten
{"title":"个人参与者数据元分析:亲职教育计划对破坏性行为影响的中介因素的个体差异。","authors":"Liina Björg Laas Sigurðardóttir, G J Melendez-Torres, Sophia Backhaus, Frances Gardner, Stephen Scott, Patty Leijten","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although parenting programs are the most widely used approach to reduce disruptive behavior in children, there is a notable lack of understanding of the exact changes in parenting that underlie their effects. Challenges include the frequent use of composite measures of parenting behavior and insufficient power to detect mediation effects and individual differences in these in individual trials.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individual participant data from 14 European randomized controlled trials of social learning-based parenting programs were pooled to examine which specific parenting behaviors best explain program effects. Participants included 3,252 families with children ages 1 to 13 years. Parental use of praise, tangible rewards, physical discipline, harsh verbal discipline, and not following through on discipline were included as putative mediators. Additionally, the study explored whether subgroups of families showing different mediational pathways exist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in parenting partially mediated program effects, with all included parenting behaviors except parental use of praise serving as unique mediators. Less harsh verbal discipline and increased following through on discipline were the strongest mediators. The study identified 3 subgroups with distinct responses to parenting programs. Most families benefited, partly through increased following through on discipline; families with the least or most difficulties were more likely to benefit less or not at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings offer insight into the specific parenting behavior changes key to reducing disruptive child behavior, while highlighting the need for innovative research methodologies to gain a deeper understanding of individual differences in parenting program benefits and mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Study preregistration information: </strong>Study Preregistration: Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis: Individual Differences in Mediators of Parenting Program Effects on Disruptive Behavior; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.11.005.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis: Individual Differences in Mediators of Parenting Program Effects on Disruptive Behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Liina Björg Laas Sigurðardóttir, G J Melendez-Torres, Sophia Backhaus, Frances Gardner, Stephen Scott, Patty Leijten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although parenting programs are the most widely used approach to reduce disruptive behavior in children, there is a notable lack of understanding of the exact changes in parenting that underlie their effects. Challenges include the frequent use of composite measures of parenting behavior and insufficient power to detect mediation effects and individual differences in these in individual trials.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individual participant data from 14 European randomized controlled trials of social learning-based parenting programs were pooled to examine which specific parenting behaviors best explain program effects. Participants included 3,252 families with children ages 1 to 13 years. Parental use of praise, tangible rewards, physical discipline, harsh verbal discipline, and not following through on discipline were included as putative mediators. Additionally, the study explored whether subgroups of families showing different mediational pathways exist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in parenting partially mediated program effects, with all included parenting behaviors except parental use of praise serving as unique mediators. Less harsh verbal discipline and increased following through on discipline were the strongest mediators. The study identified 3 subgroups with distinct responses to parenting programs. Most families benefited, partly through increased following through on discipline; families with the least or most difficulties were more likely to benefit less or not at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings offer insight into the specific parenting behavior changes key to reducing disruptive child behavior, while highlighting the need for innovative research methodologies to gain a deeper understanding of individual differences in parenting program benefits and mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Study preregistration information: </strong>Study Preregistration: Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis: Individual Differences in Mediators of Parenting Program Effects on Disruptive Behavior; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.11.005.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管亲职教育项目是减少儿童破坏性行为最广泛使用的方法,但人们对亲职教育的确切变化缺乏了解,而这些变化正是其效果的基础。面临的挑战包括:经常使用育儿行为的综合衡量标准,以及在个别试验中检测中介效应和个体差异的力量不足:我们汇集了欧洲 14 项以社会学习为基础的育儿项目随机对照试验中的个体参与者数据,以研究哪些具体的育儿行为最能解释项目的效果。参与者为 3252 个有 1 至 13 岁子女的家庭。我们将父母使用表扬、有形奖励、体罚、严厉的口头管教以及不遵守管教规定等行为作为推定的中介因素。此外,我们还探讨了是否存在显示不同中介途径的家庭亚群:结果:养育子女方面的变化对项目效果起到了部分中介作用,除父母使用表扬外,其他所有养育子女的行为都起到了独特的中介作用。减少严厉的口头管教和加强管教的后续行动是最强的中介作用。我们发现三个亚组对亲职教育计划有不同的反应。大多数家庭都能从中受益,部分原因是对管教的跟进程度有所提高;而那些困难最少或最多的家庭则更有可能受益较少,甚至完全没有受益:我们的研究结果让我们深入了解了减少儿童破坏性行为的关键因素--父母养育行为的具体改变,同时也强调了创新研究方法的必要性,以便更深入地了解父母养育计划的益处和机制方面的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis: Individual Differences in Mediators of Parenting Program Effects on Disruptive Behavior.

Objective: Although parenting programs are the most widely used approach to reduce disruptive behavior in children, there is a notable lack of understanding of the exact changes in parenting that underlie their effects. Challenges include the frequent use of composite measures of parenting behavior and insufficient power to detect mediation effects and individual differences in these in individual trials.

Method: Individual participant data from 14 European randomized controlled trials of social learning-based parenting programs were pooled to examine which specific parenting behaviors best explain program effects. Participants included 3,252 families with children ages 1 to 13 years. Parental use of praise, tangible rewards, physical discipline, harsh verbal discipline, and not following through on discipline were included as putative mediators. Additionally, the study explored whether subgroups of families showing different mediational pathways exist.

Results: Changes in parenting partially mediated program effects, with all included parenting behaviors except parental use of praise serving as unique mediators. Less harsh verbal discipline and increased following through on discipline were the strongest mediators. The study identified 3 subgroups with distinct responses to parenting programs. Most families benefited, partly through increased following through on discipline; families with the least or most difficulties were more likely to benefit less or not at all.

Conclusion: These findings offer insight into the specific parenting behavior changes key to reducing disruptive child behavior, while highlighting the need for innovative research methodologies to gain a deeper understanding of individual differences in parenting program benefits and mechanisms.

Study preregistration information: Study Preregistration: Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis: Individual Differences in Mediators of Parenting Program Effects on Disruptive Behavior; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2023.11.005.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Hats Off: Journal Awards 2024 Transparency: Disclosure of Financial Interests Editorial Board Page Council Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1