Icodec ONWARDS:面向执业护士和助理医师的首次每周一次糖尿病治疗回顾。

Davida Kruger, Melissa Magwire, Scott Urquhart
{"title":"Icodec ONWARDS:面向执业护士和助理医师的首次每周一次糖尿病治疗回顾。","authors":"Davida Kruger, Melissa Magwire, Scott Urquhart","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes management is challenged by the complexity of treatment regimens and the need for frequent injections, affecting patient adherence and quality of life. Insulin icodec, a once-weekly basal insulin analog, represents a significant innovation, potentially simplifying diabetes care and improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical implications of insulin icodec for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, highlighting its potential to affect current treatment paradigms.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A review was conducted comparing once-weekly insulin icodec with daily basal insulin analogs using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to ensure transparent reporting of systematic reviews. A search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insulin icodec has demonstrated effective glycemic management and a safety profile comparable to daily basal insulins. Its extended half-life and steady-state glucose-lowering effect have the potential to reduce the burden of daily injections and improve patient adherence.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The introduction of once-weekly insulin icodec represents an advancement in diabetes care. For front-line clinicians, this innovation aligns with the need for more straightforward medication regimens. Coupled with continuous glucose monitoring systems, it enables a more personalized and efficient approach to diabetes management, with the potential to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. This underscores the impact of integrating such advancements into practice, highlighting the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in adopting these innovations to optimize patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Icodec ONWARDS: A review of the first once-weekly diabetes treatment for nurse practitioners and physician assistants.\",\"authors\":\"Davida Kruger, Melissa Magwire, Scott Urquhart\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes management is challenged by the complexity of treatment regimens and the need for frequent injections, affecting patient adherence and quality of life. Insulin icodec, a once-weekly basal insulin analog, represents a significant innovation, potentially simplifying diabetes care and improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical implications of insulin icodec for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, highlighting its potential to affect current treatment paradigms.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A review was conducted comparing once-weekly insulin icodec with daily basal insulin analogs using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to ensure transparent reporting of systematic reviews. A search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insulin icodec has demonstrated effective glycemic management and a safety profile comparable to daily basal insulins. Its extended half-life and steady-state glucose-lowering effect have the potential to reduce the burden of daily injections and improve patient adherence.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The introduction of once-weekly insulin icodec represents an advancement in diabetes care. For front-line clinicians, this innovation aligns with the need for more straightforward medication regimens. Coupled with continuous glucose monitoring systems, it enables a more personalized and efficient approach to diabetes management, with the potential to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. This underscores the impact of integrating such advancements into practice, highlighting the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in adopting these innovations to optimize patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病治疗面临着治疗方案复杂和需要频繁注射的挑战,影响了患者的依从性和生活质量。胰岛素 icodec 是一种每周一次的基础胰岛素类似物,是一项重大创新,有可能简化糖尿病护理并改善疗效:本综述旨在评估胰岛素 icodec 对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的安全性、有效性和临床意义,强调其影响当前治疗模式的潜力:为确保系统性综述报告的透明性,我们采用《系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南对每周一次的胰岛素 icodec 和每日基础胰岛素类似物进行了综述比较。在以下数据库中进行了搜索:PubMed、Google Scholar、Embase 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,重点关注疗效和安全性结果:结论:胰岛素 icodec 可有效控制血糖,其安全性与日用基础胰岛素相当。其延长的半衰期和稳态降糖效果有可能减轻每日注射的负担并提高患者的依从性:每周一次的胰岛素 icodec 的问世代表了糖尿病护理领域的进步。对于一线临床医生来说,这一创新符合更简单用药方案的需求。它与连续血糖监测系统相结合,可实现更加个性化和高效的糖尿病管理方法,并有可能提高患者满意度和临床疗效。这凸显了将此类先进技术融入实践的影响,突出了执业护士和医生助理在采用这些创新技术优化患者护理方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Icodec ONWARDS: A review of the first once-weekly diabetes treatment for nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Background: Diabetes management is challenged by the complexity of treatment regimens and the need for frequent injections, affecting patient adherence and quality of life. Insulin icodec, a once-weekly basal insulin analog, represents a significant innovation, potentially simplifying diabetes care and improving outcomes.

Objectives: This review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical implications of insulin icodec for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, highlighting its potential to affect current treatment paradigms.

Data sources: A review was conducted comparing once-weekly insulin icodec with daily basal insulin analogs using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to ensure transparent reporting of systematic reviews. A search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes.

Conclusions: Insulin icodec has demonstrated effective glycemic management and a safety profile comparable to daily basal insulins. Its extended half-life and steady-state glucose-lowering effect have the potential to reduce the burden of daily injections and improve patient adherence.

Implications for practice: The introduction of once-weekly insulin icodec represents an advancement in diabetes care. For front-line clinicians, this innovation aligns with the need for more straightforward medication regimens. Coupled with continuous glucose monitoring systems, it enables a more personalized and efficient approach to diabetes management, with the potential to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. This underscores the impact of integrating such advancements into practice, highlighting the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in adopting these innovations to optimize patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
A case study of hypophosphatasia: An underdiagnosed bone disorder characterized by low alkaline phosphatase. Integration of point-of-care ultrasound in a nurse practitioner-led heart failure clinic. Illness perceptions and blood pressure control among hypertensive Filipino Americans: A cross-sectional study. Comparing health care outcomes before and after employing nurse practitioners in cardiovascular hospitals in Japan: A retrospective chart review. Enhancing nurse practitioner research through reflexivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1