多指畸形的产前超声诊断和围产期结局:2016-2023年回顾性队列研究》。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1002/jum.16602
Xiaowei Xiong, Chenxiao Hou, Shijing Song, Wenjia Lei, Jingjing Wang, Qingqing Wu
{"title":"多指畸形的产前超声诊断和围产期结局:2016-2023年回顾性队列研究》。","authors":"Xiaowei Xiong, Chenxiao Hou, Shijing Song, Wenjia Lei, Jingjing Wang, Qingqing Wu","doi":"10.1002/jum.16602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the significance of polydactyly identified on prenatal ultrasonography and provide a detailed analysis of characteristics and perinatal outcomes of fetal polydactyly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with a postnatal diagnosis of fetal polydactyly between January 2016 and December 2023. The population was divided into 2 groups at postnatal diagnosis: the isolated polydactyly group and the nonisolated polydactyly group. Clinical data, prenatal ultrasonography, related genetic results, and postnatal outcomes were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study cohort comprised 328 fetuses with polydactyly. The overall detection rate of polydactyly by prenatal ultrasound was 19.2%, and the first detection rate in the first-, second-, and third-trimester were 0.9%, 14.6%, and 3.7%, respectively. Preaxial polydactyly (PPD) of hand was the most common type and the most common type of foot polydactyly was postaxial polydactyly (PAP) both in the isolated group and in the nonisolated group; the central polydactyly is rare. Syndactyly was the most common abnormality complicated with polydactyly. Between the nonpolydactyly group, the isolatedpolydactyly group and the nonisolated polydactyly group, there was a significant difference in perinatal outcome (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The second trimester is the best gestational age for prenatal ultrasound detection of polydactyly. Polydactyly of hand was more likely PPD, while polydactyly of foot was more likely PAP. When polydactyly is detected by routine prenatal ultrasound, detailed ultrasound examination and prenatal counseling should be performed to determine the possibility of an underlying genetic syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcome of Polydactyly: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2016-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaowei Xiong, Chenxiao Hou, Shijing Song, Wenjia Lei, Jingjing Wang, Qingqing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.16602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the significance of polydactyly identified on prenatal ultrasonography and provide a detailed analysis of characteristics and perinatal outcomes of fetal polydactyly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with a postnatal diagnosis of fetal polydactyly between January 2016 and December 2023. The population was divided into 2 groups at postnatal diagnosis: the isolated polydactyly group and the nonisolated polydactyly group. Clinical data, prenatal ultrasonography, related genetic results, and postnatal outcomes were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study cohort comprised 328 fetuses with polydactyly. The overall detection rate of polydactyly by prenatal ultrasound was 19.2%, and the first detection rate in the first-, second-, and third-trimester were 0.9%, 14.6%, and 3.7%, respectively. Preaxial polydactyly (PPD) of hand was the most common type and the most common type of foot polydactyly was postaxial polydactyly (PAP) both in the isolated group and in the nonisolated group; the central polydactyly is rare. Syndactyly was the most common abnormality complicated with polydactyly. Between the nonpolydactyly group, the isolatedpolydactyly group and the nonisolated polydactyly group, there was a significant difference in perinatal outcome (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The second trimester is the best gestational age for prenatal ultrasound detection of polydactyly. Polydactyly of hand was more likely PPD, while polydactyly of foot was more likely PAP. When polydactyly is detected by routine prenatal ultrasound, detailed ultrasound examination and prenatal counseling should be performed to determine the possibility of an underlying genetic syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16602\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要确定产前超声波检查发现的多趾畸形的重要性,并详细分析胎儿多趾畸形的特征和围产期结局:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2016年1月至2023年12月期间产后诊断为胎儿多指畸形的孕妇。人群在产后确诊时被分为两组:孤立性多指畸形组和非孤立性多指畸形组。我们获得了临床数据、产前超声波检查、相关遗传学结果和产后结局:我们的研究队列包括 328 个多趾畸形胎儿。产前超声检查的多趾畸形总检出率为 19.2%,第一、第二和第三孕期的首次检出率分别为 0.9%、14.6% 和 3.7%。在隔离组和非隔离组中,最常见的多指畸形类型是手的轴前多指畸形(PPD),最常见的多指畸形类型是足的轴后多指畸形(PAP),而中央多指畸形则很少见。合并多指畸形的畸形中最常见的是并指畸形。在非多指畸形组、孤立多指畸形组和非孤立多指畸形组之间,围产期结局有显著差异(P 结论:多指畸形的围产期结局与孤立多指畸形的围产期结局有显著差异:第二个孕期是产前超声检测多指畸形的最佳孕龄。手型多指畸形更可能是 PPD,而足型多指畸形更可能是 PAP。当常规产前超声检查发现多指畸形时,应进行详细的超声检查和产前咨询,以确定是否存在潜在的遗传综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis and Perinatal Outcome of Polydactyly: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2016-2023.

Objective: To determine the significance of polydactyly identified on prenatal ultrasonography and provide a detailed analysis of characteristics and perinatal outcomes of fetal polydactyly.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with a postnatal diagnosis of fetal polydactyly between January 2016 and December 2023. The population was divided into 2 groups at postnatal diagnosis: the isolated polydactyly group and the nonisolated polydactyly group. Clinical data, prenatal ultrasonography, related genetic results, and postnatal outcomes were obtained.

Results: Our study cohort comprised 328 fetuses with polydactyly. The overall detection rate of polydactyly by prenatal ultrasound was 19.2%, and the first detection rate in the first-, second-, and third-trimester were 0.9%, 14.6%, and 3.7%, respectively. Preaxial polydactyly (PPD) of hand was the most common type and the most common type of foot polydactyly was postaxial polydactyly (PAP) both in the isolated group and in the nonisolated group; the central polydactyly is rare. Syndactyly was the most common abnormality complicated with polydactyly. Between the nonpolydactyly group, the isolatedpolydactyly group and the nonisolated polydactyly group, there was a significant difference in perinatal outcome (P < .001).

Conclusion: The second trimester is the best gestational age for prenatal ultrasound detection of polydactyly. Polydactyly of hand was more likely PPD, while polydactyly of foot was more likely PAP. When polydactyly is detected by routine prenatal ultrasound, detailed ultrasound examination and prenatal counseling should be performed to determine the possibility of an underlying genetic syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
期刊最新文献
The Median Nerve Displays Adaptive Characteristics When Exposed to Repeated Pinch Grip Efforts of Varying Rates of Force Development: An Ultrasonic Investigation. Ultrasound Pattern of Congenital Smooth Muscle Hamartoma of the Skin. Ultrasonographic Features of the Fallopian Tubes: An Overview on Main Tubal Pathologies. Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Features of Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumors: A Two-Center Retrospective Study. Sonographic Characterization of Red-Blue Neurofibromas in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: An Observational Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1