评估预防性喷托非利兰对创伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发病率的影响:随机三盲安慰剂对照试验。

Q2 Medicine Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.64
Sepehr Shirzadeh, Navid Omidkhoda, Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour, Reza Mannani, Vahid Jomehzadeh
{"title":"评估预防性喷托非利兰对创伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发病率的影响:随机三盲安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Sepehr Shirzadeh, Navid Omidkhoda, Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour, Reza Mannani, Vahid Jomehzadeh","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammation is important in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Traumatic injuries have been assumed to be primary ARDS causes. Recently, pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PEI), was shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and reduce the incidence of ARDS. The present study investigated the impact of preventive pentoxifylline administration in trauma patients prone to ARDS development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 62 trauma patients admitted to the Kamyab Hospital in Mashhad,Iran, with ARDS risk who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into treatment and placebo groups. The treatment group received 400 mg pentoxifylline 3 times a day, while the control group received placebo tablets thrice for 1 week. Before the intervention and during the study, factors such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, continuous pulse oximetry, CRP, PO<sub>2</sub>, PCO<sub>2</sub>, and PH were assessed. Finally, the obtained data were analyzed using SPSS Version 26 via a generalized estimating equations model and an independent t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The heart rate was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the placebo group (<i>P</i> = 0.036). In addition, PO<sub>2</sub> levels were remarkably higher in the treatment group (<i>P</i> = 0.040). Changes in respiratory rate (<i>P</i> = 0.064), CRP (<i>P</i> = 0.341), PH (<i>P</i> = 0.910), PCO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.892), HCO<sub>3</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.172), systolic blood pressure (<i>P</i> = 0.302), and SPO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.350) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the incidence and severity of ARDS between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study revealed that pentoxifylline administration to trauma patients had no beneficial effects on ARDS but improved some vital signs and laboratory variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Preventive Pentoxifylline Effect on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Incidence in Traumatic Patients: A Randomized Triple-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sepehr Shirzadeh, Navid Omidkhoda, Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour, Reza Mannani, Vahid Jomehzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/mjiri.38.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammation is important in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Traumatic injuries have been assumed to be primary ARDS causes. Recently, pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PEI), was shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and reduce the incidence of ARDS. The present study investigated the impact of preventive pentoxifylline administration in trauma patients prone to ARDS development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 62 trauma patients admitted to the Kamyab Hospital in Mashhad,Iran, with ARDS risk who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into treatment and placebo groups. The treatment group received 400 mg pentoxifylline 3 times a day, while the control group received placebo tablets thrice for 1 week. Before the intervention and during the study, factors such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, continuous pulse oximetry, CRP, PO<sub>2</sub>, PCO<sub>2</sub>, and PH were assessed. Finally, the obtained data were analyzed using SPSS Version 26 via a generalized estimating equations model and an independent t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The heart rate was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the placebo group (<i>P</i> = 0.036). In addition, PO<sub>2</sub> levels were remarkably higher in the treatment group (<i>P</i> = 0.040). Changes in respiratory rate (<i>P</i> = 0.064), CRP (<i>P</i> = 0.341), PH (<i>P</i> = 0.910), PCO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.892), HCO<sub>3</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.172), systolic blood pressure (<i>P</i> = 0.302), and SPO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.350) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the incidence and severity of ARDS between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study revealed that pentoxifylline administration to trauma patients had no beneficial effects on ARDS but improved some vital signs and laboratory variations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的重要病理生理学因素。外伤一直被认为是导致 ARDS 的主要原因。最近,一种磷酸二酯酶抑制剂(PEI)--喷托非韦林(pentoxifylline)被证明具有抗炎作用,可降低 ARDS 的发病率。本研究调查了预防性服用喷托非利兰对易发生 ARDS 的外伤患者的影响:本研究共纳入伊朗马什哈德市 Kamyab 医院收治的 62 名有 ARDS 风险且符合纳入和排除标准的外伤患者。患者被随机分为治疗组和安慰剂组。治疗组服用 400 毫克喷托非利兰,每天 3 次;对照组服用安慰剂,每次 3 片,连续服用 1 周。在干预前和研究期间,对心率、血压、呼吸频率、连续脉搏血氧饱和度、CRP、PO2、PCO2 和 PH 等因素进行了评估。最后,使用 SPSS 26 版通过广义估计方程模型和独立 t 检验对所得数据进行分析:结果:治疗组的心率明显低于安慰剂组(P = 0.036)。此外,治疗组的 PO2 水平明显高于安慰剂组(P = 0.040)。呼吸频率(P = 0.064)、CRP(P = 0.341)、PH(P = 0.910)、PCO2(P = 0.892)、HCO3(P = 0.172)、收缩压(P = 0.302)和 SPO2(P = 0.350)的变化在两组之间没有显著差异。此外,两组间 ARDS 的发生率和严重程度也无明显差异:本研究结果表明,对创伤患者施用喷托非利尔对 ARDS 没有益处,但能改善一些生命体征和实验室变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Preventive Pentoxifylline Effect on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Incidence in Traumatic Patients: A Randomized Triple-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Background: Inflammation is important in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Traumatic injuries have been assumed to be primary ARDS causes. Recently, pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PEI), was shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and reduce the incidence of ARDS. The present study investigated the impact of preventive pentoxifylline administration in trauma patients prone to ARDS development.

Methods: A total of 62 trauma patients admitted to the Kamyab Hospital in Mashhad,Iran, with ARDS risk who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into treatment and placebo groups. The treatment group received 400 mg pentoxifylline 3 times a day, while the control group received placebo tablets thrice for 1 week. Before the intervention and during the study, factors such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, continuous pulse oximetry, CRP, PO2, PCO2, and PH were assessed. Finally, the obtained data were analyzed using SPSS Version 26 via a generalized estimating equations model and an independent t test.

Results: The heart rate was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the placebo group (P = 0.036). In addition, PO2 levels were remarkably higher in the treatment group (P = 0.040). Changes in respiratory rate (P = 0.064), CRP (P = 0.341), PH (P = 0.910), PCO2 (P = 0.892), HCO3 (P = 0.172), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.302), and SPO2 (P = 0.350) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the incidence and severity of ARDS between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: The findings of this study revealed that pentoxifylline administration to trauma patients had no beneficial effects on ARDS but improved some vital signs and laboratory variations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Silymarin on Expression of micro-RNA-21 and Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and 9 and Tissue Inhibitors of Matrix Metalloproteinase (TIMP) 1 and 2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line (HepG2). Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Kinds of Reading Interventions on Reading Outcomes in Third to Fifth Grade Farsi Speaker Students with Dyslexia: An Exploratory Study. A Narrative Review of Vocational Rehabilitation in People with Spinal Cord Injury in Different Countries. Prevalence of Ponticulus Posticus among Orthodontic Patients of Iranian Population by Lateral Cephalogram. Determining Predictive Power of Base Excess in Comparison with SOFA Score for Predicting Mortality in ICU Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1