临床实践中的额颞叶痴呆症鉴别诊断:单中心额叶行为转诊回顾。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200360
Natasha Krishnadas, Marcia Chew, Antony Sutherland, Maja Christensen, Kirrily A Rogers, Christopher Kyndt, Fariha Islam, David G Darby, Amy Brodtmann
{"title":"临床实践中的额颞叶痴呆症鉴别诊断:单中心额叶行为转诊回顾。","authors":"Natasha Krishnadas, Marcia Chew, Antony Sutherland, Maja Christensen, Kirrily A Rogers, Christopher Kyndt, Fariha Islam, David G Darby, Amy Brodtmann","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Many neurodegenerative syndromes present with impairment of frontal networks, especially frontoinsular networks affecting social and emotional cognition. People presenting with frontal network impairments may be considered for a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) diagnosis. We sought to examine the diagnostic mix of patients referred with frontal network impairments to a single cognitive neurology service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of all patients seen between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Eastern Cognitive Disorders Clinic, a quaternary cognitive neurology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: (1) were referred for suspected FTD or with a preexisting diagnosis of a FTD syndrome, (2) were referred for 'frontal behaviors' (i.e., disinhibition, disorganization, poor judgment, loss of empathy, apathy) and/or had an informant report of behavior change, and (3) had available referral documents and clinical consensus diagnosis. Referral diagnosis was compared against final diagnosis adjudicated by a consensus multidisciplinary team. Case details including age of symptom onset, Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised scores, psychiatric history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were compared against the final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 161 patients aged 42-82 years (mean = 64.5, SD = 9.0; 74.5% men) met inclusion criteria. The commonest final diagnosis was a FTD syndrome (44.6%: 26.7% behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), 9.3% progressive supranuclear palsy, 6.2% semantic dementia, 1.2% corticobasal syndrome, and 1.2% FTD/motor neuron disease). A primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) was the next commonest diagnosis (15.5%), followed by vascular cognitive impairment (VCI, 10.6%), Alzheimer disease (AD, 9.9%), and other neurologic diagnoses (6.2%). A final diagnosis of bvFTD was associated with higher rates of medical comorbidities and more eating behavior abnormalities compared with a diagnosis of PPD. Screening cognitive tests and preexisting psychiatric history did not distinguish these 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A broad spectrum of neurologic and psychiatric disorders may present with impairments to frontal networks. Almost half of patients referred had a final FTD syndrome diagnosis, with bvFTD the commonest final diagnosis. People with PPD, VCI, and AD present with similar clinical profiles but are distinguishable using MRI and FDG-PET imaging. Medical and psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with bvFTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"e200360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontotemporal Dementia Differential Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of Frontal Behavioral Referrals.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Krishnadas, Marcia Chew, Antony Sutherland, Maja Christensen, Kirrily A Rogers, Christopher Kyndt, Fariha Islam, David G Darby, Amy Brodtmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Many neurodegenerative syndromes present with impairment of frontal networks, especially frontoinsular networks affecting social and emotional cognition. People presenting with frontal network impairments may be considered for a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) diagnosis. We sought to examine the diagnostic mix of patients referred with frontal network impairments to a single cognitive neurology service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of all patients seen between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Eastern Cognitive Disorders Clinic, a quaternary cognitive neurology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: (1) were referred for suspected FTD or with a preexisting diagnosis of a FTD syndrome, (2) were referred for 'frontal behaviors' (i.e., disinhibition, disorganization, poor judgment, loss of empathy, apathy) and/or had an informant report of behavior change, and (3) had available referral documents and clinical consensus diagnosis. Referral diagnosis was compared against final diagnosis adjudicated by a consensus multidisciplinary team. Case details including age of symptom onset, Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised scores, psychiatric history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were compared against the final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 161 patients aged 42-82 years (mean = 64.5, SD = 9.0; 74.5% men) met inclusion criteria. The commonest final diagnosis was a FTD syndrome (44.6%: 26.7% behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), 9.3% progressive supranuclear palsy, 6.2% semantic dementia, 1.2% corticobasal syndrome, and 1.2% FTD/motor neuron disease). A primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) was the next commonest diagnosis (15.5%), followed by vascular cognitive impairment (VCI, 10.6%), Alzheimer disease (AD, 9.9%), and other neurologic diagnoses (6.2%). A final diagnosis of bvFTD was associated with higher rates of medical comorbidities and more eating behavior abnormalities compared with a diagnosis of PPD. Screening cognitive tests and preexisting psychiatric history did not distinguish these 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A broad spectrum of neurologic and psychiatric disorders may present with impairments to frontal networks. Almost half of patients referred had a final FTD syndrome diagnosis, with bvFTD the commonest final diagnosis. People with PPD, VCI, and AD present with similar clinical profiles but are distinguishable using MRI and FDG-PET imaging. Medical and psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with bvFTD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e200360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:许多神经退行性综合征都会导致额叶网络受损,尤其是影响社交和情感认知的额叶内侧网络。额叶网络受损的患者可能会被考虑诊断为额颞叶痴呆(FTD)。我们试图研究转诊到一家认知神经学服务机构的额叶网络损伤患者的诊断组合:我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在澳大利亚墨尔本一家四级认知神经学诊所--东方认知障碍诊所就诊的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。符合以下标准的患者均被纳入研究范围:(1)因疑似 FTD 转诊或已有 FTD 综合征诊断;(2)因 "前额行为"(即抑制、组织混乱、判断力差、移情能力丧失、冷漠)转诊和/或有行为改变的线人报告;(3)有可用的转诊文件和临床共识诊断。将转诊诊断与多学科小组达成共识的最终诊断进行比较。病例详情包括症状发作年龄、《剑桥行为清单-修订版》评分、精神病史和夏尔森合并症指数,并与最终诊断进行比较:共有 161 名患者符合纳入标准,年龄在 42-82 岁之间(平均 = 64.5,SD = 9.0;74.5% 为男性)。最常见的最终诊断是 FTD 综合征(44.6%):行为变异型 FTD (bvFTD) 占 26.7%,进行性核上性麻痹占 9.3%,语义痴呆占 6.2%,皮质基底综合征占 1.2%,FTD/运动神经元疾病占 1.2%)。原发性精神障碍(PPD)是下一个最常见的诊断(15.5%),其次是血管性认知障碍(VCI,10.6%)、阿尔茨海默病(AD,9.9%)和其他神经系统诊断(6.2%)。与 PPD 诊断相比,bvFTD 的最终诊断与更高的医疗合并症发生率和更多的饮食行为异常有关。筛查认知测试和既往精神病史并未将这两组患者区分开来:讨论:多种神经和精神疾病都可能导致额叶网络受损。近一半的转诊患者最终被诊断为FTD综合征,其中bvFTD是最常见的最终诊断。PPD、VCI和AD患者的临床表现相似,但可通过核磁共振成像和FDG-PET成像加以区分。在bvFTD患者中,医疗和精神并发症很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frontotemporal Dementia Differential Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: A Single-Center Retrospective Review of Frontal Behavioral Referrals.

Background and objectives: Many neurodegenerative syndromes present with impairment of frontal networks, especially frontoinsular networks affecting social and emotional cognition. People presenting with frontal network impairments may be considered for a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) diagnosis. We sought to examine the diagnostic mix of patients referred with frontal network impairments to a single cognitive neurology service.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients seen between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Eastern Cognitive Disorders Clinic, a quaternary cognitive neurology clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: (1) were referred for suspected FTD or with a preexisting diagnosis of a FTD syndrome, (2) were referred for 'frontal behaviors' (i.e., disinhibition, disorganization, poor judgment, loss of empathy, apathy) and/or had an informant report of behavior change, and (3) had available referral documents and clinical consensus diagnosis. Referral diagnosis was compared against final diagnosis adjudicated by a consensus multidisciplinary team. Case details including age of symptom onset, Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised scores, psychiatric history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were compared against the final diagnosis.

Results: In total, 161 patients aged 42-82 years (mean = 64.5, SD = 9.0; 74.5% men) met inclusion criteria. The commonest final diagnosis was a FTD syndrome (44.6%: 26.7% behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), 9.3% progressive supranuclear palsy, 6.2% semantic dementia, 1.2% corticobasal syndrome, and 1.2% FTD/motor neuron disease). A primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) was the next commonest diagnosis (15.5%), followed by vascular cognitive impairment (VCI, 10.6%), Alzheimer disease (AD, 9.9%), and other neurologic diagnoses (6.2%). A final diagnosis of bvFTD was associated with higher rates of medical comorbidities and more eating behavior abnormalities compared with a diagnosis of PPD. Screening cognitive tests and preexisting psychiatric history did not distinguish these 2 groups.

Discussion: A broad spectrum of neurologic and psychiatric disorders may present with impairments to frontal networks. Almost half of patients referred had a final FTD syndrome diagnosis, with bvFTD the commonest final diagnosis. People with PPD, VCI, and AD present with similar clinical profiles but are distinguishable using MRI and FDG-PET imaging. Medical and psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with bvFTD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
A Real-World Prospective Multiple Sclerosis Pregnancy Registry in the United States: PREG-MS. Disparate Use of Diagnostic Modalities for Patients With Limited English Proficiency and Neurologic Disorders. Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Neurosarcoidosis: A Delphi Survey of Experts Across the United States. Improving the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Genetically Confirmed Adult-Onset Huntington Disease: Considering Nonmotor Presentations. National Trends in Stroke Presentation, Treatments, and Outcomes During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1