连续葡萄糖监测与口服葡萄糖耐量试验在诊断代谢手术后倾倒综合征方面的有效性比较。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07530-9
Bethan Price, Monelle Bertrand, Ana Estrade, Pierre Brinas, Géraud Tuyeras, Eric Guillaume, Stéphane Bordes, Emilie Montastier, Hélène Hanaire, Patrick Ritz
{"title":"连续葡萄糖监测与口服葡萄糖耐量试验在诊断代谢手术后倾倒综合征方面的有效性比较。","authors":"Bethan Price, Monelle Bertrand, Ana Estrade, Pierre Brinas, Géraud Tuyeras, Eric Guillaume, Stéphane Bordes, Emilie Montastier, Hélène Hanaire, Patrick Ritz","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07530-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dumping syndrome (DS) is a common complication of metabolic surgery, occurring in as many as 40% of bariatric patients. The reference diagnostic test is oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) which is often poorly tolerated and may induce false positive results. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is better tolerated and can monitor patients for about 2 weeks in everyday life. This study aimed at testing the diagnostic capacity of CGM in patients with and without DS, as validated by OGTT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective monocentric study including adults after bariatric surgery, who complained of DS-compatible symptoms and who had OGTT. CGM characteristics were compared in DS-positive (n = 37) and DS-negative patients (n = 14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the CGM parameters differed between the two groups: mean, variability, time in range, and time above or below range. OGTT induced different hematocrit and pulse rate responses (by DS definition) but no difference in blood glucose values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite being a better-tolerated test than OGTT, CGM should not be recommended for the diagnosis of DS. It may still be useful for monitoring glucose values in everyday life to help patients modify their diet, when DS is caused by carbohydrates with high glycemic index. The reference diagnostic test for dumping syndrome is poorly tolerated and artificial. CGM is useful in everyday life, and changes in glucose might be a signal of dumping syndrome. However, CGM is not a valid diagnostic test for dumping syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Dumping Syndrome After Metabolic Surgery, in Comparison to the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.\",\"authors\":\"Bethan Price, Monelle Bertrand, Ana Estrade, Pierre Brinas, Géraud Tuyeras, Eric Guillaume, Stéphane Bordes, Emilie Montastier, Hélène Hanaire, Patrick Ritz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-024-07530-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dumping syndrome (DS) is a common complication of metabolic surgery, occurring in as many as 40% of bariatric patients. The reference diagnostic test is oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) which is often poorly tolerated and may induce false positive results. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is better tolerated and can monitor patients for about 2 weeks in everyday life. This study aimed at testing the diagnostic capacity of CGM in patients with and without DS, as validated by OGTT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective monocentric study including adults after bariatric surgery, who complained of DS-compatible symptoms and who had OGTT. CGM characteristics were compared in DS-positive (n = 37) and DS-negative patients (n = 14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the CGM parameters differed between the two groups: mean, variability, time in range, and time above or below range. OGTT induced different hematocrit and pulse rate responses (by DS definition) but no difference in blood glucose values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite being a better-tolerated test than OGTT, CGM should not be recommended for the diagnosis of DS. It may still be useful for monitoring glucose values in everyday life to help patients modify their diet, when DS is caused by carbohydrates with high glycemic index. The reference diagnostic test for dumping syndrome is poorly tolerated and artificial. CGM is useful in everyday life, and changes in glucose might be a signal of dumping syndrome. However, CGM is not a valid diagnostic test for dumping syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07530-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07530-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:倾倒综合征(DS)是代谢手术的常见并发症,多达 40% 的减肥患者会出现这种情况。参考诊断测试是口服葡萄糖耐量测试(OGTT),这种测试通常耐受性较差,并可能导致假阳性结果。连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)的耐受性较好,可在日常生活中对患者进行约两周的监测。本研究旨在测试 CGM 对 DS 患者和非 DS 患者的诊断能力,并通过 OGTT 进行验证:这是一项回顾性单中心研究,研究对象包括接受过减肥手术、主诉有 DS 相关症状并进行过 OGTT 的成人。比较了 DS 阳性患者(37 人)和 DS 阴性患者(14 人)的 CGM 特征:结果:两组患者的 CGM 参数均无差异:平均值、变异性、在范围内的时间、高于或低于范围的时间。OGTT 引起了不同的血细胞比容和脉率反应(根据 DS 定义),但血糖值没有差异:结论:尽管 CGM 是一种比 OGTT 更好耐受的测试,但不应推荐用于 DS 的诊断。如果 DS 是由高升糖指数的碳水化合物引起的,那么 CGM 仍可用于监测日常生活中的血糖值,帮助患者调整饮食。倾倒综合征的参考诊断测试耐受性差,而且是人为的。CGM 在日常生活中很有用,血糖变化可能是倾倒综合征的信号。然而,血糖监测仪并非倾倒综合征的有效诊断测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Dumping Syndrome After Metabolic Surgery, in Comparison to the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.

Purpose: Dumping syndrome (DS) is a common complication of metabolic surgery, occurring in as many as 40% of bariatric patients. The reference diagnostic test is oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) which is often poorly tolerated and may induce false positive results. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is better tolerated and can monitor patients for about 2 weeks in everyday life. This study aimed at testing the diagnostic capacity of CGM in patients with and without DS, as validated by OGTT.

Material and methods: This is a retrospective monocentric study including adults after bariatric surgery, who complained of DS-compatible symptoms and who had OGTT. CGM characteristics were compared in DS-positive (n = 37) and DS-negative patients (n = 14).

Results: None of the CGM parameters differed between the two groups: mean, variability, time in range, and time above or below range. OGTT induced different hematocrit and pulse rate responses (by DS definition) but no difference in blood glucose values.

Conclusion: Despite being a better-tolerated test than OGTT, CGM should not be recommended for the diagnosis of DS. It may still be useful for monitoring glucose values in everyday life to help patients modify their diet, when DS is caused by carbohydrates with high glycemic index. The reference diagnostic test for dumping syndrome is poorly tolerated and artificial. CGM is useful in everyday life, and changes in glucose might be a signal of dumping syndrome. However, CGM is not a valid diagnostic test for dumping syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
"Impenetrable" Is a Subjective Term and Bariatric Procedures Can Provide a Safer Treatment Option for Patients with Obesity and Complex Abdominal Wall Hernias-"Laparocele". The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Respiratory Recovery in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Obesity Is Increasing in Liver Transplant Recipients and Exacerbates Cardiovascular Risk: A Single-Centre European Study. Narrative Comments Regarding the Efficacy of Aprepitant in Preventing Post-bariatric Surgery Nausea and Vomiting: Evidence from Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1