Sofia Torres-Small, Christina N Ward, Sarah L Thurmond, Ana Tomescu, Rebecca Smith, Charles B Macdonald, Robert Yawn, Samuel H Smith, Sarah E Warren, Celine Richard
{"title":"包容性声音景观:种族、社会经济地位和母亲年龄如何影响小儿人工耳蜗植入之旅。","authors":"Sofia Torres-Small, Christina N Ward, Sarah L Thurmond, Ana Tomescu, Rebecca Smith, Charles B Macdonald, Robert Yawn, Samuel H Smith, Sarah E Warren, Celine Richard","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess how race, social vulnerability, and maternal age influence pediatric cochlear implant access and usage.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary Pediatric University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included individuals aged 0 to 18 who received a cochlear implant at our center between the years 2000 and 2022. Social vulnerability data from 2020 was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 302 patients included in our study, 43% were black and 50% were white. Patients from the highest to lowest social vulnerability quintiles comprised 31%, 25%, 18%, 10%, and 14% of our sample, respectively. Race was associated with social vulnerability index (SVI) (P < .001), with a mean score of 0.70 (±0.26) and 0.49 (±0.27) for black and white patients, respectively. Later age at hearing loss (HL) diagnosis and cochlear implantation (CI) were associated with more and most vulnerable SVI (P < .05). Delayed diagnosis was also associated with black and other racial groups (P = .041), and adolescent maternal age (P = .03). Greater SVI was associated with less daily cochlear implant usage (P = .004). The most vulnerable patients were more likely to be lost to follow-up (P = .03) despite no difference based on maternal age (P = .59) and insurance status (P = .47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significance of mitigating disparities in timely diagnosis of HL, consistent CI usage, and appropriate follow-up care. This is a first step toward the formulation of novel strategies aimed at overcoming barriers and developing appropriate intervention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"651-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive Soundscapes: How Race, Socioeconomic Status and Maternal Age Influence the Pediatric Cochlear Implant Journey.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Torres-Small, Christina N Ward, Sarah L Thurmond, Ana Tomescu, Rebecca Smith, Charles B Macdonald, Robert Yawn, Samuel H Smith, Sarah E Warren, Celine Richard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess how race, social vulnerability, and maternal age influence pediatric cochlear implant access and usage.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary Pediatric University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included individuals aged 0 to 18 who received a cochlear implant at our center between the years 2000 and 2022. Social vulnerability data from 2020 was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 302 patients included in our study, 43% were black and 50% were white. Patients from the highest to lowest social vulnerability quintiles comprised 31%, 25%, 18%, 10%, and 14% of our sample, respectively. Race was associated with social vulnerability index (SVI) (P < .001), with a mean score of 0.70 (±0.26) and 0.49 (±0.27) for black and white patients, respectively. Later age at hearing loss (HL) diagnosis and cochlear implantation (CI) were associated with more and most vulnerable SVI (P < .05). Delayed diagnosis was also associated with black and other racial groups (P = .041), and adolescent maternal age (P = .03). Greater SVI was associated with less daily cochlear implant usage (P = .004). The most vulnerable patients were more likely to be lost to follow-up (P = .03) despite no difference based on maternal age (P = .59) and insurance status (P = .47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significance of mitigating disparities in timely diagnosis of HL, consistent CI usage, and appropriate follow-up care. This is a first step toward the formulation of novel strategies aimed at overcoming barriers and developing appropriate intervention programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"651-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inclusive Soundscapes: How Race, Socioeconomic Status and Maternal Age Influence the Pediatric Cochlear Implant Journey.
Objective: This study aimed to assess how race, social vulnerability, and maternal age influence pediatric cochlear implant access and usage.
Study design: Retrospective cohort.
Setting: Tertiary Pediatric University Hospital.
Methods: This study included individuals aged 0 to 18 who received a cochlear implant at our center between the years 2000 and 2022. Social vulnerability data from 2020 was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Results: Of the 302 patients included in our study, 43% were black and 50% were white. Patients from the highest to lowest social vulnerability quintiles comprised 31%, 25%, 18%, 10%, and 14% of our sample, respectively. Race was associated with social vulnerability index (SVI) (P < .001), with a mean score of 0.70 (±0.26) and 0.49 (±0.27) for black and white patients, respectively. Later age at hearing loss (HL) diagnosis and cochlear implantation (CI) were associated with more and most vulnerable SVI (P < .05). Delayed diagnosis was also associated with black and other racial groups (P = .041), and adolescent maternal age (P = .03). Greater SVI was associated with less daily cochlear implant usage (P = .004). The most vulnerable patients were more likely to be lost to follow-up (P = .03) despite no difference based on maternal age (P = .59) and insurance status (P = .47).
Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of mitigating disparities in timely diagnosis of HL, consistent CI usage, and appropriate follow-up care. This is a first step toward the formulation of novel strategies aimed at overcoming barriers and developing appropriate intervention programs.
期刊介绍:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.