经颅直流电刺激与疼痛神经科学教育相结合治疗慢性腰背痛:随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae101
Cory Alcon, Christopher Zoch, Riley Luetkenhaus, Emily Lyman, Kelli Brizzolara, Hui-Ting Goh, Sharon Wang-Price
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激与疼痛神经科学教育相结合治疗慢性腰背痛:随机对照试验。","authors":"Cory Alcon, Christopher Zoch, Riley Luetkenhaus, Emily Lyman, Kelli Brizzolara, Hui-Ting Goh, Sharon Wang-Price","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Priming the neural circuity likely targeted by pain neuroscience education (PNE), using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of PNE. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of active tDCS + PNE to sham tDCS + PNE on measures of pain, pain behaviors, and cognitive function in participants with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and high pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>20 participants were recruited and randomly allocated into the active tDCS + PNE (n = 10) or sham tDCS + PNE (n = 10) groups. All participants received five sessions of their assigned interventions over a 2-week period. The active tDCS + PNE group received 20 minutes of 2 mA, anodal current applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within groups, both interventions demonstrated significant improvement in NPRS, PCS, and TSK. The active tDCS + PNE group also demonstrated significant improvement on the SCWT, CTMT2-Inhibitory, and CTMT2-Set Shifting. Between groups, the active tDCS + PNE group showed significantly greater improvement on the PCS, SCWT, and CTMT2-Inhibitory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this pilot study suggest that active tDCS + PNE appeared to provide greater improvement than sham tDCS + PNE on levels of pain catastrophizing and attentional interference in participants with CLBP and high pain catastrophizing, consistent with both interventions targeting brain regions involved in those processes. Considering the differences between groups, tDCS appears to provide a priming effect on PNE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Pain Neuroscience Education for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cory Alcon, Christopher Zoch, Riley Luetkenhaus, Emily Lyman, Kelli Brizzolara, Hui-Ting Goh, Sharon Wang-Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnae101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Priming the neural circuity likely targeted by pain neuroscience education (PNE), using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of PNE. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of active tDCS + PNE to sham tDCS + PNE on measures of pain, pain behaviors, and cognitive function in participants with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and high pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>20 participants were recruited and randomly allocated into the active tDCS + PNE (n = 10) or sham tDCS + PNE (n = 10) groups. All participants received five sessions of their assigned interventions over a 2-week period. The active tDCS + PNE group received 20 minutes of 2 mA, anodal current applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within groups, both interventions demonstrated significant improvement in NPRS, PCS, and TSK. The active tDCS + PNE group also demonstrated significant improvement on the SCWT, CTMT2-Inhibitory, and CTMT2-Set Shifting. Between groups, the active tDCS + PNE group showed significantly greater improvement on the PCS, SCWT, and CTMT2-Inhibitory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this pilot study suggest that active tDCS + PNE appeared to provide greater improvement than sham tDCS + PNE on levels of pain catastrophizing and attentional interference in participants with CLBP and high pain catastrophizing, consistent with both interventions targeting brain regions involved in those processes. Considering the differences between groups, tDCS appears to provide a priming effect on PNE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来启动疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)可能针对的神经环路,可能会提高疼痛神经科学教育的疗效。本研究的目的是比较主动 tDCS + PNE 与假 tDCS + PNE 对慢性腰背痛(CLBP)和高度疼痛灾难化参与者的疼痛、疼痛行为和认知功能测量的影响。方法:招募 20 名参与者,随机分配到主动 tDCS + PNE 组(n = 10)或假 tDCS + PNE 组(n = 10)。所有参与者都在两周内接受了五次指定的干预治疗。主动 tDCS + PNE 组在左侧背外侧前额叶皮层接受 20 分钟的 2 毫安阳极电流:结果:在各组中,两种干预方法都能显著改善 NPRS、PCS 和 TSK。主动 tDCS + PNE 组在 SCWT、CTMT2-抑制和 CTMT2-Set Shifting 方面也有明显改善。在各组之间,主动 tDCS + PNE 组在 PCS、SCWT 和 CTMT2-抑制性方面的改善明显更大:这项试验性研究的结果表明,与假性 tDCS + PNE 相比,活性 tDCS + PNE 似乎对患有慢性阻塞性脑脊髓膜炎且疼痛灾难化程度较高的参与者的疼痛灾难化水平和注意力干扰有更大的改善作用,这与两种干预措施都针对参与这些过程的脑区是一致的。考虑到各组之间的差异,tDCS 似乎对 PNE 起到了引导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Pain Neuroscience Education for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Priming the neural circuity likely targeted by pain neuroscience education (PNE), using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of PNE. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of active tDCS + PNE to sham tDCS + PNE on measures of pain, pain behaviors, and cognitive function in participants with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and high pain catastrophizing.

Methods: 20 participants were recruited and randomly allocated into the active tDCS + PNE (n = 10) or sham tDCS + PNE (n = 10) groups. All participants received five sessions of their assigned interventions over a 2-week period. The active tDCS + PNE group received 20 minutes of 2 mA, anodal current applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Results: Within groups, both interventions demonstrated significant improvement in NPRS, PCS, and TSK. The active tDCS + PNE group also demonstrated significant improvement on the SCWT, CTMT2-Inhibitory, and CTMT2-Set Shifting. Between groups, the active tDCS + PNE group showed significantly greater improvement on the PCS, SCWT, and CTMT2-Inhibitory.

Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that active tDCS + PNE appeared to provide greater improvement than sham tDCS + PNE on levels of pain catastrophizing and attentional interference in participants with CLBP and high pain catastrophizing, consistent with both interventions targeting brain regions involved in those processes. Considering the differences between groups, tDCS appears to provide a priming effect on PNE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Building Community Through Data: The value of a Researcher Driven Open Science Ecosystem. Patient-Expressed Goals in Chronic Pain Management: A Qualitative Analysis of Primary Care Visits. Effectiveness of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) for chronic spinal pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Transforming Pain Medicine: The Power of Collaboration, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1