艾伦单抗在德国偏头痛患者中的实际应用经验:SPECTRE 研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s40122-024-00658-7
Charly Gaul, Astrid Gendolla, Dagny Holle, Hartmut Göbel, Mirja Koch, Caroline Baufeld, Cordula Weiss
{"title":"艾伦单抗在德国偏头痛患者中的实际应用经验:SPECTRE 研究。","authors":"Charly Gaul, Astrid Gendolla, Dagny Holle, Hartmut Göbel, Mirja Koch, Caroline Baufeld, Cordula Weiss","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00658-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To provide real-world insights into migraine patient population in Germany treated with erenumab, focusing on the prescription patterns and reasons for the initial dosage choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPECTRE was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in patients treated with erenumab according to approved local dose and guidelines. The study enrolled adult patients (n = 571; Germany: 105 sites) with migraine who had received erenumab for not more than 3 months before the start of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (standard deviation) patient age was 45.0 (12.3) years, and most patients were female (89.0%), Caucasian (97.6%), and non-smokers (85.1%). The starting dose of erenumab was 70 mg in 68.5% of patients and 140 mg in 31.5%. The proportion of patients with 140 mg as the starting dose was the highest (43.5%) in those aged 30-40 years. The most common reason for starting a higher dose of erenumab 140 mg was severity of migraine (47.4%). During the observational period, the proportion of patients taking erenumab 140 mg increased to 64.6% (visit 5; V5) after 12 months. Due to attrition of patients towards the end of the study (V9: 90 participants), data at V9 must be interpreted with caution. At least one dose change was performed in 45.3% of patients (i.e., erenumab 70 to 140 mg or 140 to 70 mg), 21.2% of patients attempted at least once to discontinue treatment (i.e., period with erenumab discontinuation and no other antibody treatment for migraine prevention), and 15.3% discontinued erenumab treatment, mainly because of no or insufficient treatment response (13.5%). The mean time until the first omission attempt was 332.3 (range 37-633) days. Constipation (12.1%) was the most frequently reported adverse event, in line with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of erenumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with migraine were prescribed erenumab 70 mg as the starting dose. No new safety signals were observed for erenumab versus the previous trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1659-1678"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Experience of Erenumab in Patients with Migraine in Germany: The SPECTRE Study.\",\"authors\":\"Charly Gaul, Astrid Gendolla, Dagny Holle, Hartmut Göbel, Mirja Koch, Caroline Baufeld, Cordula Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40122-024-00658-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To provide real-world insights into migraine patient population in Germany treated with erenumab, focusing on the prescription patterns and reasons for the initial dosage choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPECTRE was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in patients treated with erenumab according to approved local dose and guidelines. The study enrolled adult patients (n = 571; Germany: 105 sites) with migraine who had received erenumab for not more than 3 months before the start of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (standard deviation) patient age was 45.0 (12.3) years, and most patients were female (89.0%), Caucasian (97.6%), and non-smokers (85.1%). The starting dose of erenumab was 70 mg in 68.5% of patients and 140 mg in 31.5%. The proportion of patients with 140 mg as the starting dose was the highest (43.5%) in those aged 30-40 years. The most common reason for starting a higher dose of erenumab 140 mg was severity of migraine (47.4%). During the observational period, the proportion of patients taking erenumab 140 mg increased to 64.6% (visit 5; V5) after 12 months. Due to attrition of patients towards the end of the study (V9: 90 participants), data at V9 must be interpreted with caution. At least one dose change was performed in 45.3% of patients (i.e., erenumab 70 to 140 mg or 140 to 70 mg), 21.2% of patients attempted at least once to discontinue treatment (i.e., period with erenumab discontinuation and no other antibody treatment for migraine prevention), and 15.3% discontinued erenumab treatment, mainly because of no or insufficient treatment response (13.5%). The mean time until the first omission attempt was 332.3 (range 37-633) days. Constipation (12.1%) was the most frequently reported adverse event, in line with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of erenumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with migraine were prescribed erenumab 70 mg as the starting dose. No new safety signals were observed for erenumab versus the previous trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1659-1678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00658-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00658-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内容简介目的:了解在德国接受艾伦单抗治疗的偏头痛患者的实际情况,重点关注处方模式和初始剂量选择的原因:SPECTRE是一项观察性、非干预性、多中心、开放标签、单臂研究,研究对象是根据当地批准的剂量和指南接受艾伦单抗治疗的患者。该研究招募了偏头痛成年患者(n = 571;德国:105个研究点),这些患者在研究开始前接受艾伦单抗治疗的时间不超过3个月:患者的平均年龄(标准差)为45.0(12.3)岁,大多数患者为女性(89.0%)、白种人(97.6%)和非吸烟者(85.1%)。68.5%的患者起始剂量为70毫克,31.5%的患者起始剂量为140毫克。起始剂量为 140 毫克的患者中,年龄在 30-40 岁之间的比例最高(43.5%)。开始服用较高剂量艾伦单抗140毫克的最常见原因是偏头痛严重(47.4%)。在观察期间,服用艾伦单抗140毫克的患者比例在12个月后增至64.6%(第5次就诊;V5)。由于患者在研究接近尾声时自然减员(V9:90 名参与者),因此必须谨慎解释 V9 的数据。45.3%的患者至少更换过一次剂量(即艾珠单抗从70毫克换到140毫克或从140毫克换到70毫克),21.2%的患者至少尝试过一次中断治疗(即停用艾珠单抗且未使用其他抗体治疗偏头痛),15.3%的患者中断了艾珠单抗治疗,主要原因是没有治疗反应或治疗反应不足(13.5%)。距首次尝试停药的平均时间为 332.3 天(37-633 天)。便秘(12.1%)是最常报告的不良事件,这与艾伦单抗的产品特性概要(SmPC)一致:结论:大多数偏头痛患者的起始剂量为艾伦单抗70毫克。与之前的试验相比,艾伦单抗未发现新的安全性信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Experience of Erenumab in Patients with Migraine in Germany: The SPECTRE Study.

Introduction: To provide real-world insights into migraine patient population in Germany treated with erenumab, focusing on the prescription patterns and reasons for the initial dosage choice.

Methods: SPECTRE was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in patients treated with erenumab according to approved local dose and guidelines. The study enrolled adult patients (n = 571; Germany: 105 sites) with migraine who had received erenumab for not more than 3 months before the start of the study.

Results: The mean (standard deviation) patient age was 45.0 (12.3) years, and most patients were female (89.0%), Caucasian (97.6%), and non-smokers (85.1%). The starting dose of erenumab was 70 mg in 68.5% of patients and 140 mg in 31.5%. The proportion of patients with 140 mg as the starting dose was the highest (43.5%) in those aged 30-40 years. The most common reason for starting a higher dose of erenumab 140 mg was severity of migraine (47.4%). During the observational period, the proportion of patients taking erenumab 140 mg increased to 64.6% (visit 5; V5) after 12 months. Due to attrition of patients towards the end of the study (V9: 90 participants), data at V9 must be interpreted with caution. At least one dose change was performed in 45.3% of patients (i.e., erenumab 70 to 140 mg or 140 to 70 mg), 21.2% of patients attempted at least once to discontinue treatment (i.e., period with erenumab discontinuation and no other antibody treatment for migraine prevention), and 15.3% discontinued erenumab treatment, mainly because of no or insufficient treatment response (13.5%). The mean time until the first omission attempt was 332.3 (range 37-633) days. Constipation (12.1%) was the most frequently reported adverse event, in line with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of erenumab.

Conclusion: Most patients with migraine were prescribed erenumab 70 mg as the starting dose. No new safety signals were observed for erenumab versus the previous trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Different Preemptive Analgesia Measures in Pain Management after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Lumbar Sympathetic Block to Treat CRPS in an 18-Month-Old Girl: A Breaking Barriers Case Report and Review of Literature. The Impact of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques on the Incidence of Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis. Methadone Conversion Using a 3-Day Switch Strategy in Patients with Cancer on High-Dose Opioids: A Retrospective Study. Present and Future of Pharmacological Management for Acute Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative, Traumatic, or Musculoskeletal Pain in Europe: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1