美国空军(USAF)心理健康服务提供者和行为健康技术人员的枪支筛查和干预理念与实践。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1037/ser0000904
Ian H Stanley, William C Isler, Brian P Marx, Christopher J Button, David Obergfell, Jordan Simonson, Scott M Sonnek, Eric G Meyer
{"title":"美国空军(USAF)心理健康服务提供者和行为健康技术人员的枪支筛查和干预理念与实践。","authors":"Ian H Stanley, William C Isler, Brian P Marx, Christopher J Button, David Obergfell, Jordan Simonson, Scott M Sonnek, Eric G Meyer","doi":"10.1037/ser0000904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined beliefs and practices regarding firearm assessment and lethal means safety counseling (LMSC) among U.S. Air Force (USAF) mental health providers (MHPs) and behavioral health technicians (BHTs). Data were collected from 204 USAF MHPs (74.0%; <i>n</i> = 151) and BHTs (26.0%; <i>n</i> = 53) via an anonymous, voluntary survey. A modest proportion indicated they <i>strongly/extremely</i> believe that firearm ownership (42.2%) and storage practices (58.3%) are related to suicide risk. A minority indicated they \"strongly\"/\"extremely\" believe that LMSC will yield changes in storage practices (30.9%) and decreases in suicide risk (29.9%). Across patient scenarios, most indicated that \"most of the time\"/\"always\" they assess for firearm access (74.5%-99.5%) and provide LMSC (57.8%-95.6%). About half (52.5%) reported having distributed cable locks. Most (59.3%) indicated they are <i>somewhat interested/very interested</i> in receiving additional training on LMSC. MHPs, compared with BHTs, were significantly more likely to report believing a link between firearm ownership and storage practices and suicide risk, believing LMSC is effective at reducing suicide risk, providing LMSC to female patients and patients with current suicidal ideation, and having distributed cable locks. Findings suggest that there is not widespread agreement among USAF MHPs and BHTs that personal firearm ownership and nonsecure storage practices are associated with elevated suicide risk, and there were low levels of confidence in the effectiveness of LMSC. Yet, most USAF MHPs and BHTs reported they integrate firearm access assessment and LMSC as part of their routine clinical care, particularly for patients with identified suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firearm screening and intervention beliefs and practices among U.S. Air Force (USAF) mental health providers and behavioral health technicians.\",\"authors\":\"Ian H Stanley, William C Isler, Brian P Marx, Christopher J Button, David Obergfell, Jordan Simonson, Scott M Sonnek, Eric G Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined beliefs and practices regarding firearm assessment and lethal means safety counseling (LMSC) among U.S. Air Force (USAF) mental health providers (MHPs) and behavioral health technicians (BHTs). Data were collected from 204 USAF MHPs (74.0%; <i>n</i> = 151) and BHTs (26.0%; <i>n</i> = 53) via an anonymous, voluntary survey. A modest proportion indicated they <i>strongly/extremely</i> believe that firearm ownership (42.2%) and storage practices (58.3%) are related to suicide risk. A minority indicated they \\\"strongly\\\"/\\\"extremely\\\" believe that LMSC will yield changes in storage practices (30.9%) and decreases in suicide risk (29.9%). Across patient scenarios, most indicated that \\\"most of the time\\\"/\\\"always\\\" they assess for firearm access (74.5%-99.5%) and provide LMSC (57.8%-95.6%). About half (52.5%) reported having distributed cable locks. Most (59.3%) indicated they are <i>somewhat interested/very interested</i> in receiving additional training on LMSC. MHPs, compared with BHTs, were significantly more likely to report believing a link between firearm ownership and storage practices and suicide risk, believing LMSC is effective at reducing suicide risk, providing LMSC to female patients and patients with current suicidal ideation, and having distributed cable locks. Findings suggest that there is not widespread agreement among USAF MHPs and BHTs that personal firearm ownership and nonsecure storage practices are associated with elevated suicide risk, and there were low levels of confidence in the effectiveness of LMSC. Yet, most USAF MHPs and BHTs reported they integrate firearm access assessment and LMSC as part of their routine clinical care, particularly for patients with identified suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000904\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了美国空军(USAF)心理健康提供者(MHPs)和行为健康技术人员(BHTs)对枪支评估和致命手段安全咨询(LMSC)的看法和做法。我们通过匿名自愿调查的方式收集了 204 名美国空军心理健康提供者(74.0%;n = 151)和行为健康技师(26.0%;n = 53)的数据。一小部分人表示,他们强烈/极度相信枪支拥有率(42.2%)和枪支存放方式(58.3%)与自杀风险有关。少数人表示,他们 "强烈"/"极度 "相信 LMSC 将改变枪支存放方式(30.9%)和降低自杀风险(29.9%)。在不同的患者场景中,大多数人表示 "大多数情况下"/"总是 "评估枪支接触情况(74.5%-99.5%)并提供 LMSC(57.8%-95.6%)。约有一半(52.5%)的人表示他们分发过缆绳锁。大多数人(59.3%)表示,他们对接受有关 LMSC 的额外培训有些兴趣/非常有兴趣。与 BHT 相比,MHPs 在以下方面的比例明显更高:认为枪支所有权和存放方式与自杀风险之间存在联系、认为 LMSC 能够有效降低自杀风险、为女性患者和有自杀倾向的患者提供 LMSC 以及分发过电线锁。研究结果表明,美国空军医疗保健人员和 BHT 并未普遍认为个人枪支所有权和不安全的存储方式与自杀风险升高有关,而且对 LMSC 的有效性信心不足。然而,大多数美国空军 MHP 和 BHT 报告说,他们将枪支使用评估和 LMSC 作为常规临床护理的一部分,尤其是针对有自杀风险的患者。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Firearm screening and intervention beliefs and practices among U.S. Air Force (USAF) mental health providers and behavioral health technicians.

We examined beliefs and practices regarding firearm assessment and lethal means safety counseling (LMSC) among U.S. Air Force (USAF) mental health providers (MHPs) and behavioral health technicians (BHTs). Data were collected from 204 USAF MHPs (74.0%; n = 151) and BHTs (26.0%; n = 53) via an anonymous, voluntary survey. A modest proportion indicated they strongly/extremely believe that firearm ownership (42.2%) and storage practices (58.3%) are related to suicide risk. A minority indicated they "strongly"/"extremely" believe that LMSC will yield changes in storage practices (30.9%) and decreases in suicide risk (29.9%). Across patient scenarios, most indicated that "most of the time"/"always" they assess for firearm access (74.5%-99.5%) and provide LMSC (57.8%-95.6%). About half (52.5%) reported having distributed cable locks. Most (59.3%) indicated they are somewhat interested/very interested in receiving additional training on LMSC. MHPs, compared with BHTs, were significantly more likely to report believing a link between firearm ownership and storage practices and suicide risk, believing LMSC is effective at reducing suicide risk, providing LMSC to female patients and patients with current suicidal ideation, and having distributed cable locks. Findings suggest that there is not widespread agreement among USAF MHPs and BHTs that personal firearm ownership and nonsecure storage practices are associated with elevated suicide risk, and there were low levels of confidence in the effectiveness of LMSC. Yet, most USAF MHPs and BHTs reported they integrate firearm access assessment and LMSC as part of their routine clinical care, particularly for patients with identified suicide risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of telehealth-delivered massed trauma-focused psychotherapy among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Firearm screening and intervention beliefs and practices among U.S. Air Force (USAF) mental health providers and behavioral health technicians. Predictive validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) in a sample of New Zealand Māori and European male prisoners. Targeting chronic pain care to rural women veterans: A feasibility pilot. Reducing mental health stigma in academia: Assessing the acceptability of a first-person narrative program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1