SARS-CoV-2感染与抑郁症状风险:基于人群的CONSTANCES队列回顾性纵向研究。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724002435
Baptiste Pignon, Emmanuel Wiernik, Brigitte Ranque, Olivier Robineau, Fabrice Carrat, Gianluca Severi, Mathilde Touvier, Clément Gouraud, Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Victor Pitron, Nicolas Hoertel, Sofiane Kab, Sarah Tebeka, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Cédric Lemogne
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2感染与抑郁症状风险:基于人群的CONSTANCES队列回顾性纵向研究。","authors":"Baptiste Pignon, Emmanuel Wiernik, Brigitte Ranque, Olivier Robineau, Fabrice Carrat, Gianluca Severi, Mathilde Touvier, Clément Gouraud, Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Victor Pitron, Nicolas Hoertel, Sofiane Kab, Sarah Tebeka, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Cédric Lemogne","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Should COVID-19 have a direct impact on the risk of depression, it would suggest specific pathways for prevention and treatment. In this retrospective population-based study, we aimed to examine the association of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with depressive symptoms, distinguishing self-reported <i>v</i>. biologically confirmed COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>32 007 participants from the SAPRIS survey nested in the French CONSTANCES cohort were included. COVID-19 was measured as followed: <i>ad hoc</i> serologic testing, self-reported PCR or serology positive test results, and self-reported COVID-19. Depressive symptoms were measured with the Center of Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). Outcomes were depressive symptoms (total CES-D score, its four dimensions, and clinically significant depressive symptoms) and exposure was prior COVID-19 (no COVID-19/self-reported unconfirmed COVID-19/biologically confirmed COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to participants without COVID-19, participants with self-reported unconfirmed COVID-19 and biologically confirmed COVID-19 had higher CES-D scores (<i>β</i> for one interquartile range increase [95% CI]: 0.15 [0.08-0.22] and 0.09 [0.05-0.13], respectively) and somatic complaints dimension scores (0.15 [0.09-0.21] and 0.10 [0.07-0.13]). Only those with self-reported but unconfirmed COVID-19 had higher depressed affect dimension scores (0.08 [0.01-0.14]). Accounting for <i>ad hoc</i> serologic testing only, the CES-D score and the somatic complaints dimension were only associated with the combination of self-reported COVID-19 and negative serology test results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between COVID-19 and depressive symptoms was merely driven by somatic symptoms of depression and did not follow a gradient consistent with the hypothesis of a direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the risk of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of depressive symptoms: a retrospective longitudinal study from the population-based CONSTANCES cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Baptiste Pignon, Emmanuel Wiernik, Brigitte Ranque, Olivier Robineau, Fabrice Carrat, Gianluca Severi, Mathilde Touvier, Clément Gouraud, Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Victor Pitron, Nicolas Hoertel, Sofiane Kab, Sarah Tebeka, Marcel Goldberg, Marie Zins, Cédric Lemogne\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291724002435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Should COVID-19 have a direct impact on the risk of depression, it would suggest specific pathways for prevention and treatment. In this retrospective population-based study, we aimed to examine the association of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with depressive symptoms, distinguishing self-reported <i>v</i>. biologically confirmed COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>32 007 participants from the SAPRIS survey nested in the French CONSTANCES cohort were included. COVID-19 was measured as followed: <i>ad hoc</i> serologic testing, self-reported PCR or serology positive test results, and self-reported COVID-19. Depressive symptoms were measured with the Center of Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). Outcomes were depressive symptoms (total CES-D score, its four dimensions, and clinically significant depressive symptoms) and exposure was prior COVID-19 (no COVID-19/self-reported unconfirmed COVID-19/biologically confirmed COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to participants without COVID-19, participants with self-reported unconfirmed COVID-19 and biologically confirmed COVID-19 had higher CES-D scores (<i>β</i> for one interquartile range increase [95% CI]: 0.15 [0.08-0.22] and 0.09 [0.05-0.13], respectively) and somatic complaints dimension scores (0.15 [0.09-0.21] and 0.10 [0.07-0.13]). Only those with self-reported but unconfirmed COVID-19 had higher depressed affect dimension scores (0.08 [0.01-0.14]). Accounting for <i>ad hoc</i> serologic testing only, the CES-D score and the somatic complaints dimension were only associated with the combination of self-reported COVID-19 and negative serology test results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between COVID-19 and depressive symptoms was merely driven by somatic symptoms of depression and did not follow a gradient consistent with the hypothesis of a direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the risk of depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578902/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:如果 COVID-19 对抑郁症的发病风险有直接影响,那么它将为预防和治疗提供特定的途径。在这项以人群为基础的回顾性研究中,我们旨在研究 SARS-CoV-2 既往感染与抑郁症状之间的关系,并对自我报告的 COVID-19 与生物证实的 COVID-19 进行区分。COVID-19的测量方法如下:临时血清学检测、自我报告的PCR或血清学阳性检测结果以及自我报告的COVID-19。抑郁症状采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行测量。结果为抑郁症状(CES-D总分、四个维度和临床显著抑郁症状),暴露程度为之前的COVID-19(无COVID-19/自我报告的未经证实的COVID-19/生物学证实的COVID-19):与没有 COVID-19 的参与者相比,自述有未经证实的 COVID-19 和经生物学证实有 COVID-19 的参与者的 CES-D 得分更高(β 为四分位数间范围增加 1 [95% CI]:分别为 0.15 [0.08-0.22] 和 0.09 [0.05-0.13])和躯体不适维度得分(分别为 0.15 [0.09-0.21] 和 0.10 [0.07-0.13])。只有自我报告但未经证实的 COVID-19 患者的抑郁情绪维度得分更高(0.08 [0.01-0.14])。如果仅考虑临时血清学检测结果,CES-D得分和躯体不适维度仅与自我报告的COVID-19和阴性血清学检测结果相关:结论:COVID-19 与抑郁症状之间的关联仅仅是由躯体抑郁症状引起的,与 SARS-CoV-2 感染直接影响抑郁症风险的假设并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of depressive symptoms: a retrospective longitudinal study from the population-based CONSTANCES cohort.

Background: Should COVID-19 have a direct impact on the risk of depression, it would suggest specific pathways for prevention and treatment. In this retrospective population-based study, we aimed to examine the association of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with depressive symptoms, distinguishing self-reported v. biologically confirmed COVID-19.

Methods: 32 007 participants from the SAPRIS survey nested in the French CONSTANCES cohort were included. COVID-19 was measured as followed: ad hoc serologic testing, self-reported PCR or serology positive test results, and self-reported COVID-19. Depressive symptoms were measured with the Center of Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). Outcomes were depressive symptoms (total CES-D score, its four dimensions, and clinically significant depressive symptoms) and exposure was prior COVID-19 (no COVID-19/self-reported unconfirmed COVID-19/biologically confirmed COVID-19).

Results: In comparison to participants without COVID-19, participants with self-reported unconfirmed COVID-19 and biologically confirmed COVID-19 had higher CES-D scores (β for one interquartile range increase [95% CI]: 0.15 [0.08-0.22] and 0.09 [0.05-0.13], respectively) and somatic complaints dimension scores (0.15 [0.09-0.21] and 0.10 [0.07-0.13]). Only those with self-reported but unconfirmed COVID-19 had higher depressed affect dimension scores (0.08 [0.01-0.14]). Accounting for ad hoc serologic testing only, the CES-D score and the somatic complaints dimension were only associated with the combination of self-reported COVID-19 and negative serology test results.

Conclusions: The association between COVID-19 and depressive symptoms was merely driven by somatic symptoms of depression and did not follow a gradient consistent with the hypothesis of a direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the risk of depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Enriching ultra-high risk for psychosis cohorts based on accumulated exposure to environmental risk factors for psychotic disorders. Examining the association between aggression and suicide attempts among army soldiers. A comparative meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies and gene expression profiles revealing the similarities and differences between late life depression and mild cognitive impairment. Letter to the editor: social influences on the relationship between dissociation and psychotic-like experience. Review and consensus on pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1