Virginie Rozée, Anna De Bayas Sanchez, Michaela Fuller, María López-Toribio, Juan A Ramón-Soria, Jose Miguel Carrasco, Kristien Hens, Joke Struyf, Francisco Guell, Manon Vialle
{"title":"反映生殖领域的性别、社会阶层和种族不平等?对 8 个欧洲国家的 38 个生育中心网站所传达的性别表述的研究。","authors":"Virginie Rozée, Anna De Bayas Sanchez, Michaela Fuller, María López-Toribio, Juan A Ramón-Soria, Jose Miguel Carrasco, Kristien Hens, Joke Struyf, Francisco Guell, Manon Vialle","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01890-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fertility centre websites are a key sources of information on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for both infertile people and the general public. As part of a global fertility market, they are also a window to attract potential future patients. They give formal and practical information but in the way the information is displayed, they also convey social representations, and in particular, gender representation in its intersectional dimension. The objective is to analyse the sex, class and race representations regarding reproduction and parenthood that are embedded in the content of fertility centre websites in eight European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 5 most visible fertility centres that appeared in the first places on Internet search were selected for each country under study, except for one country which has only three fertility centres. In total, 38 fertility centre websites were considered for a thematic analysis using an iterative approach and a comprehensive perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each centre details its services and techniques according to the legal provisions in force in its country. However, on all the websites studied, the fertility centres demonstrate a strong gendered representation. The logos generally depict women or parts of their bodies, as do the photos, which mainly show white women with light eyes. The description of the causes of infertility and the techniques offered by the centres also highlights gender differences. Sperm donation, where MAR is reserved for heterosexual couples, is included among the techniques for women with the comment that it will enable them to fulfil their dream of becoming mothers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAR, and through it the project of having a child and procreative work, is presented as a matter for white, cisgender and heterosexual women, thus fueling stratified reproduction and limiting reproductive justice. The research team formulated guidelines for fertility centres to encourage them to adopt a more inclusive approach in terms of sex, social class and race, so that the diversity of infertile people feel involved and welcome in these centres, to avoid misperceptions about infertility in the general population and to reinforce autonomy and justice in reproductive matters.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting sex, social class and race inequalities in reproduction? Study of the gender representations conveyed by 38 fertility centre websites in 8 European countries.\",\"authors\":\"Virginie Rozée, Anna De Bayas Sanchez, Michaela Fuller, María López-Toribio, Juan A Ramón-Soria, Jose Miguel Carrasco, Kristien Hens, Joke Struyf, Francisco Guell, Manon Vialle\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12978-024-01890-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fertility centre websites are a key sources of information on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for both infertile people and the general public. As part of a global fertility market, they are also a window to attract potential future patients. They give formal and practical information but in the way the information is displayed, they also convey social representations, and in particular, gender representation in its intersectional dimension. The objective is to analyse the sex, class and race representations regarding reproduction and parenthood that are embedded in the content of fertility centre websites in eight European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 5 most visible fertility centres that appeared in the first places on Internet search were selected for each country under study, except for one country which has only three fertility centres. In total, 38 fertility centre websites were considered for a thematic analysis using an iterative approach and a comprehensive perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each centre details its services and techniques according to the legal provisions in force in its country. However, on all the websites studied, the fertility centres demonstrate a strong gendered representation. The logos generally depict women or parts of their bodies, as do the photos, which mainly show white women with light eyes. The description of the causes of infertility and the techniques offered by the centres also highlights gender differences. Sperm donation, where MAR is reserved for heterosexual couples, is included among the techniques for women with the comment that it will enable them to fulfil their dream of becoming mothers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAR, and through it the project of having a child and procreative work, is presented as a matter for white, cisgender and heterosexual women, thus fueling stratified reproduction and limiting reproductive justice. The research team formulated guidelines for fertility centres to encourage them to adopt a more inclusive approach in terms of sex, social class and race, so that the diversity of infertile people feel involved and welcome in these centres, to avoid misperceptions about infertility in the general population and to reinforce autonomy and justice in reproductive matters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490993/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01890-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01890-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生育中心网站是不孕不育者和普通大众获取医学辅助生育(MAR)信息的重要来源。作为全球生育市场的一部分,它们也是吸引未来潜在患者的窗口。它们提供正式和实用的信息,但在信息展示方式上,它们也传达了社会表征,尤其是交叉层面的性别表征。本研究旨在分析八个欧洲国家的生育中心网站内容中包含的有关生育和养育子女的性别、阶级和种族表征:研究方法:除一个国家只有三家生殖中心外,每个国家都选择了在互联网搜索中排在首位的五家最知名的生殖中心。采用迭代法和综合视角对总共 38 个生育中心网站进行了专题分析:结果:每个中心都根据本国现行法律规定详细介绍了其服务和技术。然而,在所研究的所有网站上,生育中心都表现出强烈的性别特征。徽标一般描绘的是女性或其身体的一部分,照片也是如此,主要是浅色眼睛的白人女性。对不孕不育原因和中心提供的技术的描述也突出了性别差异。在为异性夫妇提供的 MAR 技术中,精子捐献也包括在为妇女提供的技术中,并评论说这将使她们实现做母亲的梦想:结论:MAR,以及通过 MAR 实现生儿育女的计划,是白人、顺性别和异性恋妇女的事情,因此助长了生殖分层,限制了生殖公正。研究小组为生育中心制定了指导方针,鼓励这些中心在性别、社会阶层和种族方面采取更具包容性的方法,使不孕不育者在这些中心感受到参与的多样性和受欢迎的程度,避免普通民众对不孕不育的误解,并加强生殖问题上的自主性和公正性。
Reflecting sex, social class and race inequalities in reproduction? Study of the gender representations conveyed by 38 fertility centre websites in 8 European countries.
Background: Fertility centre websites are a key sources of information on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for both infertile people and the general public. As part of a global fertility market, they are also a window to attract potential future patients. They give formal and practical information but in the way the information is displayed, they also convey social representations, and in particular, gender representation in its intersectional dimension. The objective is to analyse the sex, class and race representations regarding reproduction and parenthood that are embedded in the content of fertility centre websites in eight European countries.
Methods: The 5 most visible fertility centres that appeared in the first places on Internet search were selected for each country under study, except for one country which has only three fertility centres. In total, 38 fertility centre websites were considered for a thematic analysis using an iterative approach and a comprehensive perspective.
Results: Each centre details its services and techniques according to the legal provisions in force in its country. However, on all the websites studied, the fertility centres demonstrate a strong gendered representation. The logos generally depict women or parts of their bodies, as do the photos, which mainly show white women with light eyes. The description of the causes of infertility and the techniques offered by the centres also highlights gender differences. Sperm donation, where MAR is reserved for heterosexual couples, is included among the techniques for women with the comment that it will enable them to fulfil their dream of becoming mothers.
Conclusions: MAR, and through it the project of having a child and procreative work, is presented as a matter for white, cisgender and heterosexual women, thus fueling stratified reproduction and limiting reproductive justice. The research team formulated guidelines for fertility centres to encourage them to adopt a more inclusive approach in terms of sex, social class and race, so that the diversity of infertile people feel involved and welcome in these centres, to avoid misperceptions about infertility in the general population and to reinforce autonomy and justice in reproductive matters.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access.
Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.