在没有磁共振成像的情况下,通过 CT 实现准确的前列腺自动分区。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110588
{"title":"在没有磁共振成像的情况下,通过 CT 实现准确的前列腺自动分区。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for prostate segmentation. Computed tomography (CT)-based segmentation is prone to observer bias, potentially overestimating the prostate volume by ∼ 30 % compared to MRI. However, MRI accessibility is challenging for patients with contraindications or in rural areas globally with limited clinical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study investigates the possibility of achieving MRI-level prostate auto-segmentation accuracy using CT-only input via a deep learning (DL) model trained with CT-MRI registered segmentation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A cohort of 111 definitive prostate radiotherapy patients with both CT and MRI images was retrospectively grouped into training (n = 37) and validation (n = 20) (where reference contours were derived from CT-MRI registration), and testing (n = 54) sets. Two commercial DL models were benchmarked against the reference contours in the training and validation sets. A custom DL model was incrementally retrained using the training dataset, quantitatively evaluated on the validation dataset, and qualitatively assessed by two different physician groups on the validation and testing datasets. A contour quality assurance (QA) model, established from the proposed model on the validation dataset, was applied to the test group to identify potential errors, confirmed by human visual inspection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two commercial models exhibited large deviations in the prostate apex with CT-only input (median: 0.77/0.78 for Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 0.80 cm/0.83 cm for 95 % directed Hausdorff Distance (HD95), respectively). The proposed model demonstrated superior geometric similarity compared to commercial models, particularly in the apex region, with improvements of 0.05/0.17 cm and 0.06/0.25 cm in median DSC/HD95, respectively. Physician evaluation on MRI-CT registration data rated 69 %-78 % of the proposed model’s contours as clinically acceptable without modifications. Additionally, 73 % of cases flagged by the contour quality assurance (QA) model were confirmed via visual inspection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed incremental learning strategy based on CT-MRI registration information enhances prostate segmentation accuracy when MRI availability is limited clinically.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving accurate prostate auto-segmentation on CT in the absence of MR imaging\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for prostate segmentation. Computed tomography (CT)-based segmentation is prone to observer bias, potentially overestimating the prostate volume by ∼ 30 % compared to MRI. However, MRI accessibility is challenging for patients with contraindications or in rural areas globally with limited clinical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study investigates the possibility of achieving MRI-level prostate auto-segmentation accuracy using CT-only input via a deep learning (DL) model trained with CT-MRI registered segmentation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A cohort of 111 definitive prostate radiotherapy patients with both CT and MRI images was retrospectively grouped into training (n = 37) and validation (n = 20) (where reference contours were derived from CT-MRI registration), and testing (n = 54) sets. Two commercial DL models were benchmarked against the reference contours in the training and validation sets. A custom DL model was incrementally retrained using the training dataset, quantitatively evaluated on the validation dataset, and qualitatively assessed by two different physician groups on the validation and testing datasets. A contour quality assurance (QA) model, established from the proposed model on the validation dataset, was applied to the test group to identify potential errors, confirmed by human visual inspection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two commercial models exhibited large deviations in the prostate apex with CT-only input (median: 0.77/0.78 for Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 0.80 cm/0.83 cm for 95 % directed Hausdorff Distance (HD95), respectively). The proposed model demonstrated superior geometric similarity compared to commercial models, particularly in the apex region, with improvements of 0.05/0.17 cm and 0.06/0.25 cm in median DSC/HD95, respectively. Physician evaluation on MRI-CT registration data rated 69 %-78 % of the proposed model’s contours as clinically acceptable without modifications. Additionally, 73 % of cases flagged by the contour quality assurance (QA) model were confirmed via visual inspection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed incremental learning strategy based on CT-MRI registration information enhances prostate segmentation accuracy when MRI availability is limited clinically.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035667\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:磁共振成像(MRI)被认为是前列腺分割的黄金标准。基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的分割容易出现观察者偏差,与核磁共振成像相比,可能会高估前列腺体积 30%。然而,对于有禁忌症的患者或全球临床资源有限的农村地区来说,MRI的可及性具有挑战性。目的:本研究通过使用CT-MRI注册分割训练的深度学习(DL)模型,研究使用纯CT输入达到MRI水平的前列腺自动分割准确性的可能性:回顾性地将111名同时具有CT和MRI图像的确诊前列腺放疗患者分为训练组(n = 37)、验证组(n = 20)(其中参考轮廓来自CT-MRI登记)和测试组(n = 54)。根据训练集和验证集中的参考轮廓,对两个商业 DL 模型进行了基准测试。使用训练数据集对自定义 DL 模型进行增量再训练,在验证数据集上进行定量评估,并由两个不同的医生小组在验证和测试数据集上进行定性评估。根据验证数据集上的建议模型建立的轮廓质量保证(QA)模型被应用于测试组,以识别潜在的错误,并通过人工目测进行确认:结果:两个商用模型在前列腺顶点与纯 CT 输入值的偏差较大(中位数为 0.77/0.78,D 值为 0.77/0.78):狄斯相似系数(DSC)为 0.77/0.78,95%定向豪斯多夫距离(HD95)为 0.80 厘米/0.83 厘米)。与商用模型相比,所提出的模型具有更高的几何相似性,尤其是在顶点区域,DSC/HD95 中值分别提高了 0.05/0.17 厘米和 0.06/0.25 厘米。医生对核磁共振-计算机断层扫描(MRI-CT)登记数据进行评估后,认为 69%-78% 的拟议模型轮廓在不做修改的情况下临床上可以接受。此外,轮廓质量保证(QA)模型标记的病例中有 73% 通过目测得到了确认:结论:基于 CT-MRI 注册信息的增量学习策略提高了前列腺分割的准确性,而磁共振成像在临床上的可用性是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achieving accurate prostate auto-segmentation on CT in the absence of MR imaging

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for prostate segmentation. Computed tomography (CT)-based segmentation is prone to observer bias, potentially overestimating the prostate volume by ∼ 30 % compared to MRI. However, MRI accessibility is challenging for patients with contraindications or in rural areas globally with limited clinical resources.

Purpose

This study investigates the possibility of achieving MRI-level prostate auto-segmentation accuracy using CT-only input via a deep learning (DL) model trained with CT-MRI registered segmentation.

Methods and Materials

A cohort of 111 definitive prostate radiotherapy patients with both CT and MRI images was retrospectively grouped into training (n = 37) and validation (n = 20) (where reference contours were derived from CT-MRI registration), and testing (n = 54) sets. Two commercial DL models were benchmarked against the reference contours in the training and validation sets. A custom DL model was incrementally retrained using the training dataset, quantitatively evaluated on the validation dataset, and qualitatively assessed by two different physician groups on the validation and testing datasets. A contour quality assurance (QA) model, established from the proposed model on the validation dataset, was applied to the test group to identify potential errors, confirmed by human visual inspection.

Results

Two commercial models exhibited large deviations in the prostate apex with CT-only input (median: 0.77/0.78 for Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 0.80 cm/0.83 cm for 95 % directed Hausdorff Distance (HD95), respectively). The proposed model demonstrated superior geometric similarity compared to commercial models, particularly in the apex region, with improvements of 0.05/0.17 cm and 0.06/0.25 cm in median DSC/HD95, respectively. Physician evaluation on MRI-CT registration data rated 69 %-78 % of the proposed model’s contours as clinically acceptable without modifications. Additionally, 73 % of cases flagged by the contour quality assurance (QA) model were confirmed via visual inspection.

Conclusions

The proposed incremental learning strategy based on CT-MRI registration information enhances prostate segmentation accuracy when MRI availability is limited clinically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
A feasibility study of dose-band prediction in radiation therapy: Predicting a spectrum of plan dose Auto-contouring of cardiac substructures for Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR): A STOPSTORM.eu consortium study Automated segmentation in planning-CT for breast cancer radiotherapy: A review of recent advances Boron neutron capture therapy for cutaneous angiosarcoma and malignant melanoma: First in-human phase I clinical trial Long-term trends in the burden of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China: A comprehensive analysis from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2030 based on the global burden of disease study 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1