Julia R Varshavsky, Juleen Lam, Courtney Cooper, Patrick Allard, Jennifer Fung, Ashwini Oke, Ravinder Kumar, Joshua F Robinson, Tracey J Woodruff
{"title":"分析高通量检测数据,推进环境化学品对人类生殖毒性的快速筛查。","authors":"Julia R Varshavsky, Juleen Lam, Courtney Cooper, Patrick Allard, Jennifer Fung, Ashwini Oke, Ravinder Kumar, Joshua F Robinson, Tracey J Woodruff","doi":"10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While high-throughput (HTP) assays have been proposed as platforms to rapidly assess reproductive toxicity, there is currently a lack of established assays that specifically address germline development/function and fertility. We assessed the applicability domains of yeast (S. cerevisiae) and nematode (C. elegans) HTP assays in toxicity screening of 124 environmental chemicals, determining their agreement in identifying toxicants and their concordance with reproductive toxicity in vivo. We integrated data generated in the two models and compared results using a streamlined, semi-automated benchmark dose (BMD) modeling approach. We then extracted and modeled relevant mammalian in vivo data available for the matching chemicals included in the Toxicological Reference Database (ToxRefDB). We ranked potencies of common compounds using the BMD and evaluated correlation between the datasets using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. We found moderate to good correlation across the three data sets, with r = 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.28-1.00, p<0.001) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.40 (p=0.002) for the parametric and rank order correlations between the HTP BMDs; r = 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.76-1.00, p=0.0005) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.89 (p=0.006) between the yeast assay and ToxRefDB BMDs; and r = 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.28-1.00, p=0.014) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.75 (p=0.033) between the worm assay and ToxRefDB BMDs. Our findings underscore the potential of these HTP assays to identify environmental chemicals that exhibit reproductive toxicity. Integrating these HTP datasets into mammalian in vivo prediction models using machine learning methods could further enhance their predictive value in future rapid screening efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":21137,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"108725"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing high-throughput assay data to advance the rapid screening of environmental chemicals for human reproductive toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Julia R Varshavsky, Juleen Lam, Courtney Cooper, Patrick Allard, Jennifer Fung, Ashwini Oke, Ravinder Kumar, Joshua F Robinson, Tracey J Woodruff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While high-throughput (HTP) assays have been proposed as platforms to rapidly assess reproductive toxicity, there is currently a lack of established assays that specifically address germline development/function and fertility. We assessed the applicability domains of yeast (S. cerevisiae) and nematode (C. elegans) HTP assays in toxicity screening of 124 environmental chemicals, determining their agreement in identifying toxicants and their concordance with reproductive toxicity in vivo. We integrated data generated in the two models and compared results using a streamlined, semi-automated benchmark dose (BMD) modeling approach. We then extracted and modeled relevant mammalian in vivo data available for the matching chemicals included in the Toxicological Reference Database (ToxRefDB). We ranked potencies of common compounds using the BMD and evaluated correlation between the datasets using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. We found moderate to good correlation across the three data sets, with r = 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.28-1.00, p<0.001) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.40 (p=0.002) for the parametric and rank order correlations between the HTP BMDs; r = 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.76-1.00, p=0.0005) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.89 (p=0.006) between the yeast assay and ToxRefDB BMDs; and r = 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.28-1.00, p=0.014) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.75 (p=0.033) between the worm assay and ToxRefDB BMDs. Our findings underscore the potential of these HTP assays to identify environmental chemicals that exhibit reproductive toxicity. Integrating these HTP datasets into mammalian in vivo prediction models using machine learning methods could further enhance their predictive value in future rapid screening efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108725\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing high-throughput assay data to advance the rapid screening of environmental chemicals for human reproductive toxicity.
While high-throughput (HTP) assays have been proposed as platforms to rapidly assess reproductive toxicity, there is currently a lack of established assays that specifically address germline development/function and fertility. We assessed the applicability domains of yeast (S. cerevisiae) and nematode (C. elegans) HTP assays in toxicity screening of 124 environmental chemicals, determining their agreement in identifying toxicants and their concordance with reproductive toxicity in vivo. We integrated data generated in the two models and compared results using a streamlined, semi-automated benchmark dose (BMD) modeling approach. We then extracted and modeled relevant mammalian in vivo data available for the matching chemicals included in the Toxicological Reference Database (ToxRefDB). We ranked potencies of common compounds using the BMD and evaluated correlation between the datasets using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. We found moderate to good correlation across the three data sets, with r = 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.28-1.00, p<0.001) and rs = 0.40 (p=0.002) for the parametric and rank order correlations between the HTP BMDs; r = 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.76-1.00, p=0.0005) and rs = 0.89 (p=0.006) between the yeast assay and ToxRefDB BMDs; and r = 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.28-1.00, p=0.014) and rs = 0.75 (p=0.033) between the worm assay and ToxRefDB BMDs. Our findings underscore the potential of these HTP assays to identify environmental chemicals that exhibit reproductive toxicity. Integrating these HTP datasets into mammalian in vivo prediction models using machine learning methods could further enhance their predictive value in future rapid screening efforts.
期刊介绍:
Drawing from a large number of disciplines, Reproductive Toxicology publishes timely, original research on the influence of chemical and physical agents on reproduction. Written by and for obstetricians, pediatricians, embryologists, teratologists, geneticists, toxicologists, andrologists, and others interested in detecting potential reproductive hazards, the journal is a forum for communication among researchers and practitioners. Articles focus on the application of in vitro, animal and clinical research to the practice of clinical medicine.
All aspects of reproduction are within the scope of Reproductive Toxicology, including the formation and maturation of male and female gametes, sexual function, the events surrounding the fusion of gametes and the development of the fertilized ovum, nourishment and transport of the conceptus within the genital tract, implantation, embryogenesis, intrauterine growth, placentation and placental function, parturition, lactation and neonatal survival. Adverse reproductive effects in males will be considered as significant as adverse effects occurring in females. To provide a balanced presentation of approaches, equal emphasis will be given to clinical and animal or in vitro work. Typical end points that will be studied by contributors include infertility, sexual dysfunction, spontaneous abortion, malformations, abnormal histogenesis, stillbirth, intrauterine growth retardation, prematurity, behavioral abnormalities, and perinatal mortality.