使用芳香中药进行嗅觉训练治疗 SARS-CoV-2 引起的嗅觉功能障碍的临床疗效。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.035
X-F Qiao, L-Y Han, Y-F Li, H Li, H-M Zhen, H-R Dang, Y Chen, X Li
{"title":"使用芳香中药进行嗅觉训练治疗 SARS-CoV-2 引起的嗅觉功能障碍的临床疗效。","authors":"X-F Qiao, L-Y Han, Y-F Li, H Li, H-M Zhen, H-R Dang, Y Chen, X Li","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of olfactory training using aromatic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for addressing severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced olfactory dysfunction, while also exploring the factors that influence the observed efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>172 outpatients with SARS-CoV-2-related olfactory dysfunction were randomized into two groups. The experimental group received olfactory training with TCM aromatics (ginger, Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae, Santali Albi Lignum, Styrax), while the control group used non-TCM aromatics (phenyl ethanol-rose, menthol-mint, citronellal-lemon, eugenol-clove) for 24 weeks. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks test and TDI (threshold-discrimination-identification) scores at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment were 3.66%, 25.61%, and 43.90% in the experimental group, and 4.94%, 23.46%, and 43.21% in the control group. The TDI scores of the experimental group and the control group were statistically different before and after treatment. At 3 and 6 months post-treatment, TDI scores increased significantly, with enhanced odor discrimination and identification capabilities in both groups compared to pre-treatment, while the odor detection threshold was not improved compared with that before treatment. At the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, experimental group showed significantly higher self-rated sleep and anxiety scores than controls, indicating notable improvement in both after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Olfactory training with aromatic TCM offers an effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2-induced olfactory dysfunction, improving odor discrimination, identification without significant differences compared to conventional aromatics, besides, it may also improve anxiety and sleep quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy of olfactory training using aromatic traditional Chinese medicine in managing olfactory dysfunction induced by SARS-CoV-2.\",\"authors\":\"X-F Qiao, L-Y Han, Y-F Li, H Li, H-M Zhen, H-R Dang, Y Chen, X Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin24.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of olfactory training using aromatic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for addressing severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced olfactory dysfunction, while also exploring the factors that influence the observed efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>172 outpatients with SARS-CoV-2-related olfactory dysfunction were randomized into two groups. The experimental group received olfactory training with TCM aromatics (ginger, Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae, Santali Albi Lignum, Styrax), while the control group used non-TCM aromatics (phenyl ethanol-rose, menthol-mint, citronellal-lemon, eugenol-clove) for 24 weeks. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks test and TDI (threshold-discrimination-identification) scores at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment were 3.66%, 25.61%, and 43.90% in the experimental group, and 4.94%, 23.46%, and 43.21% in the control group. The TDI scores of the experimental group and the control group were statistically different before and after treatment. At 3 and 6 months post-treatment, TDI scores increased significantly, with enhanced odor discrimination and identification capabilities in both groups compared to pre-treatment, while the odor detection threshold was not improved compared with that before treatment. At the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, experimental group showed significantly higher self-rated sleep and anxiety scores than controls, indicating notable improvement in both after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Olfactory training with aromatic TCM offers an effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2-induced olfactory dysfunction, improving odor discrimination, identification without significant differences compared to conventional aromatics, besides, it may also improve anxiety and sleep quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"77-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的方法:将172名SARS-CoV-2相关嗅觉功能障碍门诊患者随机分为两组。实验组接受中药芳香剂(生姜、陈皮、山橘皮、冥草)的嗅觉训练,对照组使用非中药芳香剂(苯乙醇-玫瑰、薄荷-薄荷、香茅-柠檬、丁香酚-丁香),为期 24 周。在基线、治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月,使用嗅觉棒测试和 TDI(阈值-辨别-识别)评分评估嗅觉功能:实验组治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月的应答率分别为 3.66%、25.61% 和 43.90%,对照组分别为 4.94%、23.46% 和 43.21%。实验组和对照组的 TDI 评分在治疗前后有统计学差异。治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月,实验组和对照组的 TDI 分数均显著增加,气味辨别和识别能力均比治疗前有所提高,但气味检测阈值与治疗前相比没有提高。在3个月和6个月的随访中,实验组的自我睡眠评分和焦虑评分均明显高于对照组,表明治疗后实验组在这两方面均有明显改善:结论:使用芳香中药进行嗅觉训练可有效治疗 SARS-CoV-2 引起的嗅觉功能障碍,与传统芳香剂相比,可提高气味辨别、识别能力,但无明显差异,此外还可改善焦虑和睡眠质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical efficacy of olfactory training using aromatic traditional Chinese medicine in managing olfactory dysfunction induced by SARS-CoV-2.

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of olfactory training using aromatic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for addressing severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced olfactory dysfunction, while also exploring the factors that influence the observed efficacy.

Methods: 172 outpatients with SARS-CoV-2-related olfactory dysfunction were randomized into two groups. The experimental group received olfactory training with TCM aromatics (ginger, Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae, Santali Albi Lignum, Styrax), while the control group used non-TCM aromatics (phenyl ethanol-rose, menthol-mint, citronellal-lemon, eugenol-clove) for 24 weeks. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks test and TDI (threshold-discrimination-identification) scores at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Results: Response rates at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment were 3.66%, 25.61%, and 43.90% in the experimental group, and 4.94%, 23.46%, and 43.21% in the control group. The TDI scores of the experimental group and the control group were statistically different before and after treatment. At 3 and 6 months post-treatment, TDI scores increased significantly, with enhanced odor discrimination and identification capabilities in both groups compared to pre-treatment, while the odor detection threshold was not improved compared with that before treatment. At the 3- and 6-month follow-ups, experimental group showed significantly higher self-rated sleep and anxiety scores than controls, indicating notable improvement in both after treatment.

Conclusion: Olfactory training with aromatic TCM offers an effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2-induced olfactory dysfunction, improving odor discrimination, identification without significant differences compared to conventional aromatics, besides, it may also improve anxiety and sleep quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1