小儿胸椎和腰椎过度突出症的手术治疗算法。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00986-w
Julián Calcagni, Carlos A Tello, Lucas Piantoni, Rodrigo Remondino, Eduardo Galaretto, Juan Pablo Arispe, Mariano Noel
{"title":"小儿胸椎和腰椎过度突出症的手术治疗算法。","authors":"Julián Calcagni, Carlos A Tello, Lucas Piantoni, Rodrigo Remondino, Eduardo Galaretto, Juan Pablo Arispe, Mariano Noel","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00986-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is no standardized and universally accepted surgical treatment for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis in children. A surgical treatment algorithm was developed to aid in the choice of the appropriate corrective technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients younger than 18 years who underwent primary correction surgery and posterior fusion for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis. Patients were categorized according to the classification of Rajasekaran et al. and divided into 2 groups: a posterior column osteotomies (PCO) group and a three-column osteotomies (3CO) group. We analyzed the angularity and flexibility of the curve, global sagittal balance, and preoperative neurological status of the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients were included. The mean age was 12.8 years (1-18) and the mean preoperative kyphosis was 93.5° (40°-175°). In the PCO group (N = 30), the sagittal deformity angular ratio (DAR) was less than 16.5 in 26 patients (86.6%), while in the 3CO group (N = 19), sagittal DAR was greater than 16.5 in 17 patients (89.4%). In the PCO group (N = 28), the T1-Pelvic angle (TPA) was less than 17° in 19 patients (67.8%), while in the 3CO group (N = 15), TPA was greater than 17° in 10 patients (66.6%). Five patients (10.2%) had recent-onset or progressive neurological alteration, all of them (100%) required 3CO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An algorithm for kyphosis was developed based on the classification by Rajasekaran et al., preoperative analysis of the angularity and flexibility of the curve, global sagittal balance and neurological status of the patient, to aid in the choice of the appropriate corrective osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical treatment algorithm for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis in pediatric population.\",\"authors\":\"Julián Calcagni, Carlos A Tello, Lucas Piantoni, Rodrigo Remondino, Eduardo Galaretto, Juan Pablo Arispe, Mariano Noel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-024-00986-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is no standardized and universally accepted surgical treatment for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis in children. A surgical treatment algorithm was developed to aid in the choice of the appropriate corrective technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients younger than 18 years who underwent primary correction surgery and posterior fusion for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis. Patients were categorized according to the classification of Rajasekaran et al. and divided into 2 groups: a posterior column osteotomies (PCO) group and a three-column osteotomies (3CO) group. We analyzed the angularity and flexibility of the curve, global sagittal balance, and preoperative neurological status of the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients were included. The mean age was 12.8 years (1-18) and the mean preoperative kyphosis was 93.5° (40°-175°). In the PCO group (N = 30), the sagittal deformity angular ratio (DAR) was less than 16.5 in 26 patients (86.6%), while in the 3CO group (N = 19), sagittal DAR was greater than 16.5 in 17 patients (89.4%). In the PCO group (N = 28), the T1-Pelvic angle (TPA) was less than 17° in 19 patients (67.8%), while in the 3CO group (N = 15), TPA was greater than 17° in 10 patients (66.6%). Five patients (10.2%) had recent-onset or progressive neurological alteration, all of them (100%) required 3CO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An algorithm for kyphosis was developed based on the classification by Rajasekaran et al., preoperative analysis of the angularity and flexibility of the curve, global sagittal balance and neurological status of the patient, to aid in the choice of the appropriate corrective osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00986-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00986-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于儿童胸椎和腰椎骨盆下垂症,目前还没有标准化和普遍接受的手术治疗方法。方法:对接受初次矫正手术的 18 岁以下患者进行了回顾性分析:方法:我们对因胸椎和腰椎后凸畸形而接受初次矫正手术和后路融合术的 18 岁以下患者进行了回顾性分析。根据 Rajasekaran 等人的分类方法将患者分为两组:后柱截骨术(PCO)组和三柱截骨术(3CO)组。我们分析了患者曲线的角度和柔韧性、整体矢状面平衡以及术前神经状态:结果:共纳入 49 名患者。平均年龄为 12.8 岁(1-18 岁),术前平均椎体后凸为 93.5°(40°-175°)。在 PCO 组(30 人)中,26 名患者(86.6%)的矢状位畸形角度比(DAR)小于 16.5,而在 3CO 组(19 人)中,17 名患者(89.4%)的矢状位畸形角度比大于 16.5。在 PCO 组(28 人)中,19 名患者(67.8%)的 T1 盆角(TPA)小于 17°,而在 3CO 组(15 人)中,10 名患者(66.6%)的 TPA 大于 17°。5名患者(10.2%)近期出现或进行性神经系统改变,所有患者(100%)都需要进行3CO治疗:根据Rajasekaran等人的分类、术前对患者曲线角度和柔韧性、整体矢状面平衡和神经状况的分析,制定了脊柱后凸的算法,以帮助选择合适的矫正截骨术:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical treatment algorithm for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis in pediatric population.

Purpose: There is no standardized and universally accepted surgical treatment for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis in children. A surgical treatment algorithm was developed to aid in the choice of the appropriate corrective technique.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients younger than 18 years who underwent primary correction surgery and posterior fusion for thoracic and lumbar hyperkyphosis. Patients were categorized according to the classification of Rajasekaran et al. and divided into 2 groups: a posterior column osteotomies (PCO) group and a three-column osteotomies (3CO) group. We analyzed the angularity and flexibility of the curve, global sagittal balance, and preoperative neurological status of the patient.

Results: Forty-nine patients were included. The mean age was 12.8 years (1-18) and the mean preoperative kyphosis was 93.5° (40°-175°). In the PCO group (N = 30), the sagittal deformity angular ratio (DAR) was less than 16.5 in 26 patients (86.6%), while in the 3CO group (N = 19), sagittal DAR was greater than 16.5 in 17 patients (89.4%). In the PCO group (N = 28), the T1-Pelvic angle (TPA) was less than 17° in 19 patients (67.8%), while in the 3CO group (N = 15), TPA was greater than 17° in 10 patients (66.6%). Five patients (10.2%) had recent-onset or progressive neurological alteration, all of them (100%) required 3CO.

Conclusion: An algorithm for kyphosis was developed based on the classification by Rajasekaran et al., preoperative analysis of the angularity and flexibility of the curve, global sagittal balance and neurological status of the patient, to aid in the choice of the appropriate corrective osteotomy.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
Human spinal height growth: a description of normal spine growth patterns and adult spine height prediction from a longitudinal cohort. Making wrong site surgery a "never event" in spinal deformity surgery by use of a "landmark vertebra" to eliminate variability in identifying a target vertebral level. Magnetically controlled growing rods increase 3D true spine length in idiopathic early onset scoliosis patients: results from a multicenter study. Factors contributing to severe scoliosis after open chest surgery for congenital heart disease: a case-control analysis. Zones where reduced implant density leads to correction loss after scoliosis surgery for Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1