加强以患者为中心的护理:化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症患者 G-CSF 给药偏好的随机研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-08929-x
Nathaniel Scher, Hanène Boudabous, Judith Partouche, Saeedeh Rezaee-Vessal, Paul Ihout, Claudia Rizzo, Hanah Lamallem, Olivier Bauduceau, Ilan Darmon, Marc Bollet, Clément Draghi, Alain Toledano
{"title":"加强以患者为中心的护理:化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症患者 G-CSF 给药偏好的随机研究。","authors":"Nathaniel Scher, Hanène Boudabous, Judith Partouche, Saeedeh Rezaee-Vessal, Paul Ihout, Claudia Rizzo, Hanah Lamallem, Olivier Bauduceau, Ilan Darmon, Marc Bollet, Clément Draghi, Alain Toledano","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08929-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia poses a significant risk to cancer patients, with pegfilgrastim being commonly used for its prevention. While pegfilgrastim can be administered via prefilled syringe or pen device, patient preferences and experiences with these delivery methods remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, observational trial (NCT05910164) at the Rafael Institute, France, comparing patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration using a prefilled syringe versus a prefilled pen device. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and requiring pegfilgrastim were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either syringe or pen first, with crossover administration. Questionnaires assessed patient preferences, learning experiences, autonomy, pain levels, emotional responses, satisfaction with nursing care, and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 randomized patients (mean age 58 years; 69% female), both groups showed a preference for the pen device, with significantly higher mean scores favoring pen administration (4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84; p = 0.00106). Patients reported significantly lower perceived pain with pen administration and stronger positive emotions compared to syringe use. Satisfaction with nursing care was higher with syringe use. Empowerment levels were similar across groups but significantly stronger when using the pen in complete autonomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A preference for pegfilgrastim administration via the pen device was observed, though this may have been influenced by the administration sequence and the absence of syringe self-administration. The insights gained can help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient-centered care in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05910164 on June 15, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 11","pages":"743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing patient-centered care: a randomized study on G-CSF administration preferences in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel Scher, Hanène Boudabous, Judith Partouche, Saeedeh Rezaee-Vessal, Paul Ihout, Claudia Rizzo, Hanah Lamallem, Olivier Bauduceau, Ilan Darmon, Marc Bollet, Clément Draghi, Alain Toledano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-08929-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia poses a significant risk to cancer patients, with pegfilgrastim being commonly used for its prevention. While pegfilgrastim can be administered via prefilled syringe or pen device, patient preferences and experiences with these delivery methods remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, observational trial (NCT05910164) at the Rafael Institute, France, comparing patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration using a prefilled syringe versus a prefilled pen device. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and requiring pegfilgrastim were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either syringe or pen first, with crossover administration. Questionnaires assessed patient preferences, learning experiences, autonomy, pain levels, emotional responses, satisfaction with nursing care, and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 randomized patients (mean age 58 years; 69% female), both groups showed a preference for the pen device, with significantly higher mean scores favoring pen administration (4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84; p = 0.00106). Patients reported significantly lower perceived pain with pen administration and stronger positive emotions compared to syringe use. Satisfaction with nursing care was higher with syringe use. Empowerment levels were similar across groups but significantly stronger when using the pen in complete autonomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A preference for pegfilgrastim administration via the pen device was observed, though this may have been influenced by the administration sequence and the absence of syringe self-administration. The insights gained can help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient-centered care in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05910164 on June 15, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"32 11\",\"pages\":\"743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08929-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08929-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症对癌症患者构成重大风险,而 pegfilgrastim 常用于预防中性粒细胞减少症。虽然 pegfilgrastim 可通过预充式注射器或笔式装置给药,但患者对这些给药方法的偏好和体验仍不清楚:我们在法国拉斐尔研究所进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机观察试验(NCT05910164),比较了患者对使用预充式注射器和预充式笔装置给药 pegfilgrastim 的偏好。接受化疗并需要使用 pegfilgrastim 的患者被纳入其中,并按 1:1 的比例随机分配,先使用注射器或笔,然后交叉给药。问卷调查评估了患者的偏好、学习经历、自主性、疼痛程度、情绪反应、对护理的满意度以及能力:在随机抽取的 150 名患者(平均年龄 58 岁;69% 为女性)中,两组患者均表示更倾向于使用笔式装置,笔式给药的平均得分明显更高(4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84;p = 0.00106)。与使用注射器相比,患者对笔式给药的疼痛感明显降低,积极情绪也更强烈。使用注射器时,患者对护理服务的满意度更高。各组的授权水平相似,但在完全自主的情况下使用笔时,授权水平明显更高:尽管这可能受到给药顺序和不使用注射器自主给药的影响,但观察到患者更倾向于通过笔式装置给药。所获得的见解有助于为临床决策提供依据,并在管理化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症时改善以患者为中心的护理:试验注册:NCT05910164,2023年6月15日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing patient-centered care: a randomized study on G-CSF administration preferences in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia poses a significant risk to cancer patients, with pegfilgrastim being commonly used for its prevention. While pegfilgrastim can be administered via prefilled syringe or pen device, patient preferences and experiences with these delivery methods remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, observational trial (NCT05910164) at the Rafael Institute, France, comparing patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration using a prefilled syringe versus a prefilled pen device. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and requiring pegfilgrastim were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either syringe or pen first, with crossover administration. Questionnaires assessed patient preferences, learning experiences, autonomy, pain levels, emotional responses, satisfaction with nursing care, and empowerment.

Results: Among 150 randomized patients (mean age 58 years; 69% female), both groups showed a preference for the pen device, with significantly higher mean scores favoring pen administration (4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84; p = 0.00106). Patients reported significantly lower perceived pain with pen administration and stronger positive emotions compared to syringe use. Satisfaction with nursing care was higher with syringe use. Empowerment levels were similar across groups but significantly stronger when using the pen in complete autonomy.

Conclusion: A preference for pegfilgrastim administration via the pen device was observed, though this may have been influenced by the administration sequence and the absence of syringe self-administration. The insights gained can help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient-centered care in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Trial registration: NCT05910164 on June 15, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
KRAS-G12 inhibitors in lung cancer therapy: unveiling the toxicity profile through a pharmacovigilance study. Streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza vaccination rates in oncological patients - data from Germany. Evaluating pain management practices for cancer patients among health professionals in cancer and supportive/palliative care units: a Belgian survey. Incidence and impact of food aversions among patients with cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy: a one-year prospective survey. Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1