脂肪或骨髓间充质干细胞治疗唾液分泌过少:系统综述和网络荟萃分析方案。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02674-2
Joachim Hansen, Amanda-Louise Fenger Carlander, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Christian Grønhøj, Christian von Buchwald
{"title":"脂肪或骨髓间充质干细胞治疗唾液分泌过少:系统综述和网络荟萃分析方案。","authors":"Joachim Hansen, Amanda-Louise Fenger Carlander, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Christian Grønhøj, Christian von Buchwald","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02674-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salivary hypofunction leads to debilitating oral symptoms and has major complications for overall quality of life. Two of the most frequent causes of xerostomia are radiotherapy in the head and neck and Sjögren's syndrome. Only symptomatic treatment is available today. An increasing number of both preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation treatment can increase the salivary flow rate and ameliorate symptoms of xerostomia. However, both adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived MSCs are used, although they differ in important ways. The primary objective of this study is an indirect comparison of the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after intervention between patients treated with adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived MSCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis will search for eligible studies in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies are as follows: clinical studies including human patients with salivary hypofunction due to either radiotherapy or Sjogren's syndrome who were subsequently treated with either adipose-derived MSCs or bone marrow-derived MSCs. Studies with no control group will be excluded. The search phrase has been peer-reviewed following the PRESS guidelines. The primary outcome is the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after treatment with either adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived MSCs. Secondary outcomes are as follows: change in patient reported outcomes, methods of intervention administration, number of injected MSCs, and safety. Data from included studies will be pooled and compared with a fixed-effects or random effects model dependent on signs of heterogeneity, presented with a forest plot, and indirectly compared with a meta-regression in a network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with the tools ROBINS-I or RoB-2 depending on type of study.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Both adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived MSCs are used today for experimental treatment of salivary hypofunction in humans as no direct or indirect comparisons have been made. Therefore, an evaluation of the effect of adipose-derived vs bone marrow-derived MSC treatment is needed to support future decision-making on the type of MSC used in a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO ID CRD42024527183.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adipose derived or bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment for hyposalivation: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Hansen, Amanda-Louise Fenger Carlander, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Christian Grønhøj, Christian von Buchwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02674-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salivary hypofunction leads to debilitating oral symptoms and has major complications for overall quality of life. Two of the most frequent causes of xerostomia are radiotherapy in the head and neck and Sjögren's syndrome. Only symptomatic treatment is available today. An increasing number of both preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation treatment can increase the salivary flow rate and ameliorate symptoms of xerostomia. However, both adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived MSCs are used, although they differ in important ways. The primary objective of this study is an indirect comparison of the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after intervention between patients treated with adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived MSCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis will search for eligible studies in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies are as follows: clinical studies including human patients with salivary hypofunction due to either radiotherapy or Sjogren's syndrome who were subsequently treated with either adipose-derived MSCs or bone marrow-derived MSCs. Studies with no control group will be excluded. The search phrase has been peer-reviewed following the PRESS guidelines. The primary outcome is the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after treatment with either adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived MSCs. Secondary outcomes are as follows: change in patient reported outcomes, methods of intervention administration, number of injected MSCs, and safety. Data from included studies will be pooled and compared with a fixed-effects or random effects model dependent on signs of heterogeneity, presented with a forest plot, and indirectly compared with a meta-regression in a network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with the tools ROBINS-I or RoB-2 depending on type of study.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Both adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived MSCs are used today for experimental treatment of salivary hypofunction in humans as no direct or indirect comparisons have been made. Therefore, an evaluation of the effect of adipose-derived vs bone marrow-derived MSC treatment is needed to support future decision-making on the type of MSC used in a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO ID CRD42024527183.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02674-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02674-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:唾液腺功能减退会导致令人衰弱的口腔症状,并对整体生活质量产生重大影响。头颈部放射治疗和斯约格伦综合征是造成唾液分泌过少的两个最常见原因。目前只能进行对症治疗。越来越多的临床前和临床研究表明,间充质干细胞(MSC)移植治疗可以增加唾液流量,改善口臭症状。然而,间充质干细胞既可用于脂肪来源,也可用于骨髓来源,但两者在一些重要方面存在差异。本研究的主要目的是间接比较接受脂肪间充质干细胞或骨髓间充质干细胞治疗的患者在干预后非刺激唾液流速的变化:本系统综述和网络荟萃分析将在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 对照试验登记簿中搜索符合条件的研究。符合条件的研究如下:包括因放疗或Sjogren综合征导致唾液功能减退的人类患者的临床研究,这些患者随后接受了脂肪间充质干细胞或骨髓间充质干细胞治疗。没有对照组的研究将被排除在外。检索词组已按照 PRESS 指南进行了同行评审。主要结果是使用脂肪间充质干细胞或骨髓间充质干细胞治疗后非刺激性唾液流速的变化。次要结果如下:患者报告结果的变化、干预给药方法、注射间充质干细胞的数量以及安全性。纳入研究的数据将进行汇总,并根据异质性迹象采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行比较,以森林图展示,并在网络荟萃分析中采用元回归进行间接比较。偏倚风险将根据研究类型使用 ROBINS-I 或 RoB-2 工具进行评估:讨论:目前,脂肪间充质干细胞和骨髓间充质干细胞都被用于人类唾液功能低下的实验性治疗,但尚未进行直接或间接的比较。因此,需要对脂肪间充质干细胞与骨髓间充质干细胞的治疗效果进行评估,以支持未来在临床试验中使用何种间充质干细胞的决策:系统综述注册:PROCMO ID CRD42024527183。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adipose derived or bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment for hyposalivation: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Salivary hypofunction leads to debilitating oral symptoms and has major complications for overall quality of life. Two of the most frequent causes of xerostomia are radiotherapy in the head and neck and Sjögren's syndrome. Only symptomatic treatment is available today. An increasing number of both preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation treatment can increase the salivary flow rate and ameliorate symptoms of xerostomia. However, both adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived MSCs are used, although they differ in important ways. The primary objective of this study is an indirect comparison of the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after intervention between patients treated with adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived MSCs.

Methods: This systematic review and network meta-analysis will search for eligible studies in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies are as follows: clinical studies including human patients with salivary hypofunction due to either radiotherapy or Sjogren's syndrome who were subsequently treated with either adipose-derived MSCs or bone marrow-derived MSCs. Studies with no control group will be excluded. The search phrase has been peer-reviewed following the PRESS guidelines. The primary outcome is the change in the unstimulated salivary flow rate after treatment with either adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived MSCs. Secondary outcomes are as follows: change in patient reported outcomes, methods of intervention administration, number of injected MSCs, and safety. Data from included studies will be pooled and compared with a fixed-effects or random effects model dependent on signs of heterogeneity, presented with a forest plot, and indirectly compared with a meta-regression in a network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with the tools ROBINS-I or RoB-2 depending on type of study.

Discussion: Both adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived MSCs are used today for experimental treatment of salivary hypofunction in humans as no direct or indirect comparisons have been made. Therefore, an evaluation of the effect of adipose-derived vs bone marrow-derived MSC treatment is needed to support future decision-making on the type of MSC used in a clinical trial.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42024527183.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and facilitators to using procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients (under 1 year old): protocol for a mixed studies systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Exploring validated strategies for screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults in primary health care: a scoping review protocol. Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences. Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature. Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1