头侧轨迹的双皮质椎弓根螺钉是固定骨质疏松椎体的最佳选择:有限元研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-03-11 eCollection Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0249
Akimasa Murata, Shunji Tsutsui, Ei Yamamoto, Takuhei Kozaki, Ryuichiro Nakanishi, Hiroshi Yamada
{"title":"头侧轨迹的双皮质椎弓根螺钉是固定骨质疏松椎体的最佳选择:有限元研究。","authors":"Akimasa Murata, Shunji Tsutsui, Ei Yamamoto, Takuhei Kozaki, Ryuichiro Nakanishi, Hiroshi Yamada","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pedicle screws are commonly used in fixation to treat various spinal disorders. However, screw loosening is a prevalent complication, particularly in patients with osteoporosis. Various biomechanical studies have sought to address this issue, but the optimal depth and trajectory to increase the fixation strength of pedicle screws remain controversial. Therefore, a biomechanical study was conducted using finite element models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional finite element models of the L3 vertebrae were developed from the preoperative computed tomography images of nine patients with osteoporosis and nine patients without who underwent spine surgery. Unicortical and bicortical pedicle screws were inserted into the center and into the anterior wall of the vertebrae, respectively, in different trajectories in the sagittal plane: straightforward, cephalad, and caudal. Subsequently, three different external loads were applied to each pedicle screw at the entry point: axial pullout, craniocaudal, and lateromedial loads. Nonlinear analysis was conducted to examine the fixation strength of the pedicle screws.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of osteoporosis, the bicortical pedicle screws had greater fixation strength than the unicortical pedicle screws in all trajectories and external loads. The fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws was not substantially different among the trajectories against any external loads in the nonosteoporotic vertebrae. However, the fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws against craniocaudal load in the cephalad trajectory was considerably greater than those in the caudal (<i>P</i>=0.016) and straightforward (<i>P</i>=0.023) trajectories in the osteoporotic vertebrae. However, this trend was not observed in pullout and lateromedial loads.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that bicortical pedicle screws should be used, regardless of whether the patient has osteoporosis or not. Furthermore, pedicle screws should be inserted in the cephalad trajectory in patients with osteoporosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study.\",\"authors\":\"Akimasa Murata, Shunji Tsutsui, Ei Yamamoto, Takuhei Kozaki, Ryuichiro Nakanishi, Hiroshi Yamada\",\"doi\":\"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pedicle screws are commonly used in fixation to treat various spinal disorders. However, screw loosening is a prevalent complication, particularly in patients with osteoporosis. Various biomechanical studies have sought to address this issue, but the optimal depth and trajectory to increase the fixation strength of pedicle screws remain controversial. Therefore, a biomechanical study was conducted using finite element models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional finite element models of the L3 vertebrae were developed from the preoperative computed tomography images of nine patients with osteoporosis and nine patients without who underwent spine surgery. Unicortical and bicortical pedicle screws were inserted into the center and into the anterior wall of the vertebrae, respectively, in different trajectories in the sagittal plane: straightforward, cephalad, and caudal. Subsequently, three different external loads were applied to each pedicle screw at the entry point: axial pullout, craniocaudal, and lateromedial loads. Nonlinear analysis was conducted to examine the fixation strength of the pedicle screws.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of osteoporosis, the bicortical pedicle screws had greater fixation strength than the unicortical pedicle screws in all trajectories and external loads. The fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws was not substantially different among the trajectories against any external loads in the nonosteoporotic vertebrae. However, the fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws against craniocaudal load in the cephalad trajectory was considerably greater than those in the caudal (<i>P</i>=0.016) and straightforward (<i>P</i>=0.023) trajectories in the osteoporotic vertebrae. However, this trend was not observed in pullout and lateromedial loads.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that bicortical pedicle screws should be used, regardless of whether the patient has osteoporosis or not. Furthermore, pedicle screws should be inserted in the cephalad trajectory in patients with osteoporosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介椎弓根螺钉常用于固定治疗各种脊柱疾病。然而,螺钉松动是一种常见的并发症,尤其是在骨质疏松症患者中。各种生物力学研究试图解决这一问题,但提高椎弓根螺钉固定强度的最佳深度和轨迹仍存在争议。因此,我们使用有限元模型进行了一项生物力学研究:方法:根据接受脊柱手术的九名骨质疏松症患者和九名非骨质疏松症患者的术前计算机断层扫描图像,建立了 L3 椎体的三维有限元模型。单皮质和双皮质椎弓根螺钉分别插入椎体中心和前壁,在矢状面上的轨迹不同:直向、头向和尾向。随后,在每个椎弓根螺钉的入口处施加了三种不同的外部载荷:轴向拉出、头尾和侧内侧载荷。对椎弓根螺钉的固定强度进行了非线性分析:无论是否患有骨质疏松症,双皮质椎弓根螺钉在所有轨迹和外部载荷下的固定强度均高于单皮质椎弓根螺钉。在非骨质疏松症椎体中,双皮质椎弓根螺钉在任何外部负荷下的固定强度在轨迹上都没有本质区别。然而,在骨质疏松椎体中,头侧轨迹的双皮质椎弓根螺钉在对抗头尾负荷时的固定强度大大高于尾侧轨迹(P=0.016)和直向轨迹(P=0.023)的双皮质椎弓根螺钉。然而,在拉出负荷和侧内侧负荷中没有观察到这一趋势:我们的研究结果表明,无论患者是否患有骨质疏松症,都应使用双皮质椎弓根螺钉。此外,骨质疏松症患者的椎弓根螺钉应按头侧轨迹植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study.

Introduction: Pedicle screws are commonly used in fixation to treat various spinal disorders. However, screw loosening is a prevalent complication, particularly in patients with osteoporosis. Various biomechanical studies have sought to address this issue, but the optimal depth and trajectory to increase the fixation strength of pedicle screws remain controversial. Therefore, a biomechanical study was conducted using finite element models.

Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models of the L3 vertebrae were developed from the preoperative computed tomography images of nine patients with osteoporosis and nine patients without who underwent spine surgery. Unicortical and bicortical pedicle screws were inserted into the center and into the anterior wall of the vertebrae, respectively, in different trajectories in the sagittal plane: straightforward, cephalad, and caudal. Subsequently, three different external loads were applied to each pedicle screw at the entry point: axial pullout, craniocaudal, and lateromedial loads. Nonlinear analysis was conducted to examine the fixation strength of the pedicle screws.

Results: Irrespective of osteoporosis, the bicortical pedicle screws had greater fixation strength than the unicortical pedicle screws in all trajectories and external loads. The fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws was not substantially different among the trajectories against any external loads in the nonosteoporotic vertebrae. However, the fixation strength of the bicortical pedicle screws against craniocaudal load in the cephalad trajectory was considerably greater than those in the caudal (P=0.016) and straightforward (P=0.023) trajectories in the osteoporotic vertebrae. However, this trend was not observed in pullout and lateromedial loads.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that bicortical pedicle screws should be used, regardless of whether the patient has osteoporosis or not. Furthermore, pedicle screws should be inserted in the cephalad trajectory in patients with osteoporosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Posterior Column Reconstruction of the Lumbar Spine Using En Bloc Resected Vertebral Arch in Spinal Tumor and Deformity Surgeries. Sclerotherapy for Aggressive Vertebral Hemangioma with Severe Bone Destruction: A 5-Year Analysis. Surgical Treatment for Cervical Lamina Metastasis from Parathyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report. Low Nutrition before Injury Is a Risk Factor for Dysphagia in Older Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Based on a Multicenter Data of 707 Patients. Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for Patients with Lumbar Spine Disease Undergoing Posterior Surgery by Generation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1