Real-world antifibrotic treatment patterns in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: retrospective analyses of two large healthcare administrative databases in the United States.

Background: Real-world data on the use, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and associated costs of antifibrotic therapies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are limited.

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of antifibrotic treatment, characteristics of patients receiving treatment, discontinuation rates, and HCRU and costs associated with treatment.

Design: This retrospective study analyzed de-identified longitudinal and cross-sectional data, respectively, from two US claims databases: Optum's de-identified Clinformatics^® Data Mart Database (CDM; commercial claims, Medicare Advantage) and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database. The study periods were October 1, 2013-March 31, 2019 and October 1, 2014-September 30, 2019, respectively. Eligible individuals were adults with ⩾1 diagnosis claim for IPF.

Methods: Antifibrotic prevalence, patient demographics, treatment discontinuation rates, and HCRU and costs were determined separately for each cohort and described using summary statistics. Bivariate comparisons were analyzed using Chi-square and Student's t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

Results: Overall, 4223 and 4459 eligible patients were identified in the CDM and VHA databases, respectively. Prevalence of antifibrotic uptake was 9.2% and 29.1% and the rate of index treatment discontinuation was 47% and 66% during follow-up in the CDM and VHA cohorts, respectively. Antifibrotic-treated patients were significantly younger (p < 0.0001) with lower mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores at baseline versus untreated patients in both cohorts. In the CDM cohort, the number of outpatient and pharmacy visits was significantly higher in treated versus untreated patients during follow-up (both p < 0.0001). A similar trend was observed for the VHA cohort. Total follow-up costs in both cohorts were significantly higher in treated versus untreated patients due to higher pharmacy costs (CDM; p < 0.0001) or higher outpatient and pharmacy costs (VHA; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The low prevalence of antifibrotic usage in both cohorts, together with the high rate of antifibrotic discontinuation, and increased HCRU and costs in treated versus untreated patients, support the need for novel treatment options for IPF.

Trial registration: Not applicable.