开发和验证风险预测模型,以评估根治性膀胱切除术后的静脉血栓栓塞风险。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-194
Chin-Hui Lai, Jiaxiang Ji, Mingrui Wang, Haopu Hu, Tao Xu, Hao Hu
{"title":"开发和验证风险预测模型,以评估根治性膀胱切除术后的静脉血栓栓塞风险。","authors":"Chin-Hui Lai, Jiaxiang Ji, Mingrui Wang, Haopu Hu, Tao Xu, Hao Hu","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical cystectomy (RC) patients are at significant risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current predictive models, such as the Caprini risk assessment (CRA) model, have limitations. This research aimed to create a novel predictive model for forecasting the risk of VTE after RC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study involved RC patients treated between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. The individuals were divided into training and testing groups in a random manner. Multivariate and stepwise logistic regression were utilized to create two novel models. The models' performance was compared to the commonly used CRA model, employing metrics including net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 272 patients were enrolled, among whom 36 were diagnosed with VTE after RC. Model A and Model B were then conducted. The area under ROC of Model A and Model B is 0.806 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.748-0.856] and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.777-0.880), respectively, which were also determined in the testing cohorts. The two new Models were superior both in classification ability and prediction ability (NRI >0, IDI >0, P<0.01). Model A and Model B had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.806 and 0.833, respectively. In decision curve analysis (DCA), the two new models provided a net benefit between 0.02 and 0.84, suggesting promising clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding predictive accuracy, both models surpass the existing CRA model, with Model A being advantageous due to its fewer variables. This easy-to-use model enables swift risk assessment and timely intervention for high-risk groups, yielding favorable patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"13 9","pages":"1823-1834"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and validating risk predicting models to assess venous thromboembolism risk after radical cystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Hui Lai, Jiaxiang Ji, Mingrui Wang, Haopu Hu, Tao Xu, Hao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-24-194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical cystectomy (RC) patients are at significant risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current predictive models, such as the Caprini risk assessment (CRA) model, have limitations. This research aimed to create a novel predictive model for forecasting the risk of VTE after RC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study involved RC patients treated between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. The individuals were divided into training and testing groups in a random manner. Multivariate and stepwise logistic regression were utilized to create two novel models. The models' performance was compared to the commonly used CRA model, employing metrics including net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 272 patients were enrolled, among whom 36 were diagnosed with VTE after RC. Model A and Model B were then conducted. The area under ROC of Model A and Model B is 0.806 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.748-0.856] and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.777-0.880), respectively, which were also determined in the testing cohorts. The two new Models were superior both in classification ability and prediction ability (NRI >0, IDI >0, P<0.01). Model A and Model B had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.806 and 0.833, respectively. In decision curve analysis (DCA), the two new models provided a net benefit between 0.02 and 0.84, suggesting promising clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding predictive accuracy, both models surpass the existing CRA model, with Model A being advantageous due to its fewer variables. This easy-to-use model enables swift risk assessment and timely intervention for high-risk groups, yielding favorable patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"1823-1834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-194\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根治性膀胱切除术(RC)患者罹患静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的风险很高。目前的预测模型(如 Caprini 风险评估 (CRA) 模型)存在局限性。本研究旨在创建一种新型预测模型,用于预测 RC 术后 VTE 的风险:这项单中心研究涉及 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间接受治疗的 RC 患者。研究人员以随机方式将患者分为训练组和测试组。利用多变量和逐步逻辑回归创建了两个新模型。利用净再分类改进(NRI)、综合辨别改进(IDI)和接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析等指标,将这些模型的性能与常用的 CRA 模型进行了比较:共有 272 名患者入选,其中 36 人在 RC 后确诊为 VTE。然后进行了模型 A 和模型 B 的分析。模型 A 和模型 B 的 ROC 下面积分别为 0.806 [95% 置信区间 (CI):0.748-0.856] 和 0.833 (95% CI:0.777-0.880)。这两个新模型在分类能力和预测能力方面都更胜一筹(NRI >0,IDI >0,PConclusions):在预测准确性方面,两个模型都超过了现有的 CRA 模型,其中模型 A 因变量较少而更具优势。该模型简单易用,可迅速进行风险评估,并对高危人群进行及时干预,从而为患者带来良好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing and validating risk predicting models to assess venous thromboembolism risk after radical cystectomy.

Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) patients are at significant risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current predictive models, such as the Caprini risk assessment (CRA) model, have limitations. This research aimed to create a novel predictive model for forecasting the risk of VTE after RC.

Methods: This single-center study involved RC patients treated between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. The individuals were divided into training and testing groups in a random manner. Multivariate and stepwise logistic regression were utilized to create two novel models. The models' performance was compared to the commonly used CRA model, employing metrics including net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.

Results: A total of 272 patients were enrolled, among whom 36 were diagnosed with VTE after RC. Model A and Model B were then conducted. The area under ROC of Model A and Model B is 0.806 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.748-0.856] and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.777-0.880), respectively, which were also determined in the testing cohorts. The two new Models were superior both in classification ability and prediction ability (NRI >0, IDI >0, P<0.01). Model A and Model B had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.806 and 0.833, respectively. In decision curve analysis (DCA), the two new models provided a net benefit between 0.02 and 0.84, suggesting promising clinical utility.

Conclusions: Regarding predictive accuracy, both models surpass the existing CRA model, with Model A being advantageous due to its fewer variables. This easy-to-use model enables swift risk assessment and timely intervention for high-risk groups, yielding favorable patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
Robotic ureteral reconstruction of non-absorbable clip erosion into the ureter: a case series. Successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in a man with partial AZFb deletion: a case report. The dartocavernous stitch surgical technique for prevention of recurrent phimosis in obese patients presenting for circumcision. Time-sensitive elements in elective treatment of urinary lithiasis: a narrative review. Understanding general public and healthcare provider knowledge gaps in male factor infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1